Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-18 Thread Gaetan
I ve started the github project now i just need to learn rust... https://github.com/Stibbons/rust-for-pythonists Le 18 nov. 2013 21:10, "Brian Anderson" a écrit : > On 11/15/2013 06:24 AM, Gaetan wrote: > > I would love a documentation "Rust for Pythonist" or "Rust for C++'iste". > > I don't

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-18 Thread Brian Anderson
On 11/15/2013 06:24 AM, Gaetan wrote: I would love a documentation "Rust for Pythonist" or "Rust for C++'iste". I don't like the Wiki page. I think the official documentation homepage should be a nice, beautiful http://doc.rust-lang.org/ . Period. It should link

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Daniel Micay
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Gaetan wrote: > I agree on the semantic point. > > The job of technical writer is quite a talent to have, not anyone can easily > vulgarize concept and present them in a logical way. This is pedagogy and > quite hard to set up in a developer's brain. > > However, o

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Gaetan
I agree on the semantic point. The job of technical writer is quite a talent to have, not anyone can easily vulgarize concept and present them in a logical way. This is pedagogy and quite hard to set up in a developer's brain. However, on tutorial I think there is a flaw: most of the a time, just

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Daniel Glazman
On 15/11/13 15:59, Daniel Micay wrote: > It's gets across most of the information, but it doesn't have a very > compelling flow of examples. It teaches how to use language features > rather than walking through building something with those features. > > For example, the sections on owned boxes a

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Daniel Micay
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM, spir wrote: > On 11/15/2013 03:55 PM, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: >> >> As the author of the original tutorial I'm interested in what people >> hate so much about it. It appears to have slightly bit-rotted, in that >> the language moved on and people haphazardly updat

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread spir
On 11/15/2013 03:55 PM, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: As the author of the original tutorial I'm interested in what people hate so much about it. It appears to have slightly bit-rotted, in that the language moved on and people haphazardly updated stuff here and there, but the bulk of it still looks coh

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Carol Willing
On 11/15/13 6:55 AM, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: As the author of the original tutorial I'm interested in what people hate so much about it. It appears to have slightly bit-rotted, in that the language moved on and people haphazardly updated stuff here and there, but the bulk of it still looks cohere

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Daniel Micay
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: > As the author of the original tutorial I'm interested in what people > hate so much about it. It appears to have slightly bit-rotted, in that > the language moved on and people haphazardly updated stuff here and > there, but the bulk of it

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Marijn Haverbeke
As the author of the original tutorial I'm interested in what people hate so much about it. It appears to have slightly bit-rotted, in that the language moved on and people haphazardly updated stuff here and there, but the bulk of it still looks coherent. Can I get some concrete pointers? On Fri,

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Daniel Micay
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Gaetan wrote: > after reading this doc, I would love to have: > - have a link at the bottom page to the github project > - submit one or several pullrequest > - doc is magically updated. > > I'm investigating on this matter to ease documentation. That's is quite >

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Gaetan
after reading this doc, I would love to have: - have a link at the bottom page to the github project - submit one or several pullrequest - doc is magically updated. I'm investigating on this matter to ease documentation. That's is quite interesting, because in my everyday job (I'm a python develop

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Gaetan
I would love a documentation "Rust for Pythonist" or "Rust for C++'iste". I don't like the Wiki page. I think the official documentation homepage should be a nice, beautiful http://doc.rust-lang.org/. Period. It should link all "official" documentation in a logical wa

Re: [rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread Daniel Micay
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:46 AM, spir wrote: > I'm exploring the tutorial "Rust for Rubyists" at > [http://www.rustforrubyists.com/book/book.html], which in fact is not (only) > for rubyists, as stated in the introduction. Looks pretty good to me (just > my opinion), should definitely be pointed t

[rust-dev] tutorial (bis)

2013-11-15 Thread spir
I'm exploring the tutorial "Rust for Rubyists" at [http://www.rustforrubyists.com/book/book.html], which in fact is not (only) for rubyists, as stated in the introduction. Looks pretty good to me (just my opinion), should definitely be pointed to from the Rust Docs page at [https://github.com/m