On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 at 01:54AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> Currently the top of the 'makefile' says:
>>
>> # WARNING: Unless you are certain that you want to use all the
>> cores/processors
>> # on your system for parallel doctesting, chan
> Then, the patches which readily have a positive review can follow
> immediately. Dan, Anne, please update their list and status on
> CategoriesRoadMap.
Ticket #3663 is the big crystal patch that should go into sage once
the rootsystem patch #4326 has gone in. None of the other patches
I submitt
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:24:49PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Is it possible that something is wrong with your patch
> triangular-morphisms-jb.patch?
My fault; I had changed an underlying patch. I just rebased Jason's
patch; please update!
Btw: I did not notice Valentin had re
Hi Jason,
Is it possible that something is wrong with your patch
triangular-morphisms-jb.patch?
Best,
Anne
..
applying trac_6655_partition_newfeature-ny.patch
applying triangular-morphisms-jb.patch
patching file sage/categories/modules_with_basis.py
Hunk #2 FAILED at 236
1 out of 5 hunks FAILE
Hi Robert, Craig,
Any chances for you to review shortly:
http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/file/tip/categories-fixsagelib-nt.patch
Thanks!
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~-~--~~~-
Dear Anne, Dan, William, Florent, Jason, ...
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote:
> > The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
> > patches with positive review related to categories, and they can be
> > the *first* to go in. I also see 4.2 a
> Is this question addressed to me, or ?
Yes.
Note that the root system patch depends on the category
patches, which why it came in this thread. Various other
long pending patches depend on it.
Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
>
>> The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
>> patches with positive review related to categories, and they can be
>> the *first* to go in. I also see 4.2 as being a relatively quick
>> release (compared to the extrem
> The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
> patches with positive review related to categories, and they can be
> the *first* to go in. I also see 4.2 as being a relatively quick
> release (compared to the extremely long 4.1.2).
Is it possible to conjecture a timetable f
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
> Dear David, dear Javier, dear category fans,
>
> Yippee! the technical patches required by the category code are making
> their way into Sage, maybe even in 4.1.2.
Since I just finished build testing 4.1.2 on a million machines
Dear David, dear Javier, dear category fans,
Yippee! the technical patches required by the category code are making
their way into Sage, maybe even in 4.1.2. Then not much remains to be
done, so I am now dreaming of getting the full thing in 4.1.3 (or
whatever the next Sage version will b
Dear Javier,
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:32:30AM -0700, javier wrote:
>
> Somebody could explain why these are different files?
>
> Assuming that by "all ideals of a ring R" we mean two-sided ideals
> (that should go inside the description!) I don't see what is the
> difference, for a co
12 matches
Mail list logo
