[sage-combinat-devel] Fwd: [sage-release] error cloning

2011-02-06 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Samuel, I'm forwarding your message to sage-combinat-devel, where it properly belongs. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- Forwarded message -- From: Samuel Lelievre Date: Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:30 PM Subject: [sage-release] error cloning To: sage-release Hello, My friend Davi

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: tickets 10632 and 10485

2011-02-06 Thread Anne Schilling
On 2/6/11 1:05 PM, Daniel Bump wrote: I am not sure I understand this comment. For me this section starts as: "The KR crystals `B^{n,s}` for types `C_n^{(1)}` and `D^{(2)}_{n+1}` were excluded from the above discussion." Could you be more specific? OK, something interesting happens involving

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: tickets 10632 and 10485

2011-02-06 Thread Daniel Bump
> I am not sure I understand this comment. For me this section starts as: > "The KR crystals `B^{n,s}` for types `C_n^{(1)}` and `D^{(2)}_{n+1}` were > excluded from the above discussion." > Could you be more specific? OK, something interesting happens involving jsmath and the cascading style sh

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: tickets 10632 and 10485

2011-02-06 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear Dan, Thank you for looking at my patch! I am looking at #10485. I see Anne posted a new version overnight. Comment 1. I built it with the -j option to use the jsfonts. sage -docbuild thematic_tutorials -j html With the jsmath option the {1,2, ..., } in this line: B^{r,s} \cong B(

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: tickets 10632 and 10485

2011-02-06 Thread Daniel Bump
I am looking at #10485. I see Anne posted a new version overnight. Comment 1. I built it with the -j option to use the jsfonts. sage -docbuild thematic_tutorials -j html With the jsmath option the {1,2, ..., } in this line: B^{r,s} \cong B(s\omega_r) \quad \text{as a \{1,2,\ldots,n\}-cry

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: tickets 10632 and 10485

2011-02-06 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Nicolas, Anne, Dan: do you mind if I focus on getting this patch to work on 4.6.2 without trying to make it simultaneously work with 4.6.1? This is of course fine. The only thing is that then it might be good to get the sage-combinat working with sage-4.6.2 (which it currently does not). C