Good morning gurus!
Two questions: 1)
applying crystals_localCharacterization_td.patch
patching file sage/categories/highest_weight_crystals.py
Hunk #3 FAILED at 125
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/categories/highest_weight_crystals.py.rej
patch failed, unable to continue
On 3/28/11 11:21 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Good morning gurus!
Two questions: 1)
applying crystals_localCharacterization_td.patch
patching file sage/categories/highest_weight_crystals.py
Hunk #3 FAILED at 125
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 08:21:03AM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
2) what can I do just to check whether something changed, without
applying the patches? I tried hg pull and hg incoming but that didn't
report any changes...
`hg log` in .hg/patches or browsing http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/
Hi Anne,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
On 3/28/11 3:21 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
The patch contains this:
ind = lambda i: (-w0.action(alpha[i])).support()[0]
This would be called for each element of hw, which
depends on the distance to the highest
Hi all!
working on #11068, I tried to move the methods responsible for
creating ideals and quotient rings from sage/rings/ring.pyx to sage/
categories/rings.py. However, it did not work, because rings are not
using categories properly.
I think I could manage to make them use categories. Or at
Hi Nicolas,
On 29 Mrz., 11:00, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
I am happy with the recycling of this ticket. Especially since we also
have #9944: categories for polynomial rings.
I guess that could be fixed as well. Currently I have
sage: QQ['x'].category()
Category of
Hi Nicolas,
On 29 Mrz., 11:19, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
All good, as long as it plays smoothly with the patches posted on
#9944!
Hm. I guess that it is better to post on #9944 rather than on #9138,
then.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are
sage: T.dynkin_diagram_automorphism_w0()
When the Dynkin diagram has a nontrivial automorphism (of order
two except D4), the map alpha - -w0(alpha) may or not
coincide with this automorphism.
The issue is with type D_n.
If n is odd, then alpha - -w0(alpha) is a nontrivial permutation of
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 08:16:53AM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote:
When the Dynkin diagram has a nontrivial automorphism (of order
two except D4), the map alpha - -w0(alpha) may or not
coincide with this automorphism.
...
Here there is a non-trivial graph automorphism but this
isn't it. Therefore
Anne wrote:
The standard name in the literature for the automorphism (which may be
trivial)
induced by -w0 is
the opposition automorphism
This seems better to me.
I was going to suggest making it a method of ClassicalCrystals (so it
would be
available for other crystals besides crystals of
10 matches
Mail list logo