Dear Dan and Christian,
I have rebased 9265 so that it applies on 5.1 but I haven't uploaded it as
I wanted to rename it and make sure that I don't clobber anything else in
the 5.1 or 5.2 queues. The main problem is that even though the queue
applies on 5.2 sage does not run due -- so far -- t
Hi All!
Since there were some nonlocal changes in sage-5.1, I think it would be best if
all
developers now switch to sage-5.2 and we focus our efforts on rebasing all
patches
to this new version of sage (instead of trying to keep backwards compatibilty
for much longer).
Best,
Anne
On 7/30/12
Sorry, I forgot the guard for trac_5457-review-as.patch and just added it!
Anne
On 7/30/12 8:12 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
> Christian Stump wrote:
>
>> unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
>
> I think a lot of patches are broke on 5.1 right now. Here is a partial list.
>
> trac
Christian Stump wrote:
> unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
I think a lot of patches are broke on 5.1 right now. Here is a partial list.
trac_5457-review-as.patch
trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch
trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch
root_system_plot_refacto
> It should apply cleanly to 5.2. Assuming you fix that and repost it,
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combin
> I also uploaded the new patch to trac, where I had to rename the patch as
> trac would not give me permission to delete some one else's patch. The
> patch probably won't apply cleanly to 5.2-rc0 for trivial reasons (white
> space)
It should apply cleanly to 5.2. Assuming you fix that and rep
ps. I put a +5.2 guard on the patch
concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch
as it didn't apply cleanly to files that I hadn't touched. (I also guarded
my patch trac_X-Kleshchev-partitions-am.patch which I forgot to do when
I uploaded it earlier).
Andrew
--
You received this m
I have rebased Jason's patch so that it apples to 5.2-rc0.
I also uploaded the new patch to trac, where I had to rename the patch as
trac would not give me permission to delete some one else's patch. The
patch probably won't apply cleanly to 5.2-rc0 for trivial reasons (white
space) as it does
Hi Keeler,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:14:41PM -0700, Keeler Russell wrote:
>I've been working on a function to calculate the chromatic symmetric
>function (a.k.a. CSF) of a graph as part of a related research project.
>You can find the code here: https://github.com/keeler/csf (
> I have rebased Jason's patch and against 5.2-rc0.I am checking the doctests
> etc. When I am done I will repost the patch to trac and the queue.
There was a message on sage-release that Sage 5.2 is now
available. It would be good to test it on that.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/relea
Hi Andrew,
On 2012-07-30, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Dependencies should be used in trac (it is one of the field in the
> definition of the ticket and consists an a (possibly empty) sequence
> of patches). An example at [1]. When a patch is ready in sage-
Vincent and Dan thanks for the replies.
Just to clarify, Vincent said:
> Dependencies should be used in trac (it is one of the field in the
> definition of the ticket and consists an a (possibly empty) sequence of
patches).
but, as Dan implied, the dependency field in trac if for when a patc
Hi All!
Travis just added a wiki page on how to install sage under windows
http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/SageDevelWindows
This can also be used for the install party later tonight in Nagoya!
Anne
PS: Franco, you promised Travis a reward for this!
--
You received this message because you
13 matches
Mail list logo
