Hello Simon!
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2012-08-22, Franco Saliola wrote:
>> --20cf307f346ad0c8b804c7df7c9f
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Over at #8899, I'm having a problem with methods not showing up in the
>> reference manual.
>>
>>
Hi!
On 2012-08-22, Franco Saliola wrote:
> --20cf307f346ad0c8b804c7df7c9f
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Over at #8899, I'm having a problem with methods not showing up in the
> reference manual.
>
> Here is a schematic of the class structure:
>
> class QuasiSymmetricFunctions
John H Palmieri
writes:
> Anyway, I just tried it out. The spkg-install file relies on the GNU
> version of 'mv', so it doesn't install on my mac without this change:
>
> diff --git a/spkg-install b/spkg-install
> --- a/spkg-install
> +++ b/spkg-install
> @@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ cd ..
> sed -i -e "s'$P
There is already an optional LiE spkg for Sage [1]. I don't know anything
about it, for example whether it even builds. But that would perhaps be a
place to start.
>
> [1] http://www.sagemath.org/packages/optional/lie-2.2.2.p4.spkg
>
> --
> John
>
Currently sage can do most everything that LiE
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:47:08 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:40:05 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
>>
>> Hi All!
>>
>> Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
>> Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:40:05 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
> Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
> Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality of LiE to Sage?
>
>
There is already an optional LiE spkg for Sage [1]. I don't know
Hi All!
Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality of LiE to Sage?
Best wishes,
Anne
Original Message
Subject: Summary comments
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:07:33 -0500
From: Savdeep Sethi
To: Daniel
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:10:01AM -0700, Gregg M wrote:
> I downloaded 5.3.beta2 recently and then had trouble installing the combinat
> queue. There seems to be a problem with the patch
> trac_12181_random_dag-fc.patch. Are others getting an error like this? I
> have included the end of th
I downloaded 5.3.beta2 recently and then had trouble installing the combinat
queue. There seems to be a problem with the patch
trac_12181_random_dag-fc.patch. Are others getting an error like this? I have
included the end of the log file below:
Gregg
- - - - - - - - -
Updating guards
hg
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:01:37AM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>Am I right in thinking that FiniteSets() and InfiniteSets() have not yet
>been implemented? It seems that FinitenumeratedSets() and
>InfinitenumeratedSets() do both exist.
They are, but only in
trac_10963-more_functorial_c
Am I right in thinking that FiniteSets() and InfiniteSets() have not yet
been implemented? It seems that FinitenumeratedSets() and
InfinitenumeratedSets() do both exist.
Btw, Nicolas, I had a quick look at trac #12955 but it wasn't clear to me
what had been done and what was left.
Andrew
On M
11 matches
Mail list logo
