Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken

2012-08-31 Thread Christian Stump
Hi Anne, sage -hg qselect sage -hg qpush -a I don't know why I constantly forget to do so. Thanks for the reminder... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Names for the bases of symmetric functions

2012-08-31 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:08:30AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Ok, final vote ... homogeneous complete homegeneous complete To summarize there was a majority for homogeneous over complete, and everybody could live with complete homogeneous, but was finding it long. So

[sage-combinat-devel] Who is the owner of trac_9280-graded-algebras-example.patch?

2012-08-31 Thread Franco Saliola
Who is the owner of trac_9280-graded-algebras-example.patch? I suspect it is Nicolas Thiéry, and if so, can I take over the patch? Franco -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-combinat-devel group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Who is the owner of trac_9280-graded-algebras-example.patch?

2012-08-31 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:10:55AM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote: I suspect it is Nicolas Thiéry, and if so, can I take over the patch? Please do!!! Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- You received this

[sage-combinat-devel] importing patches from #8899 (NCSF/QSym)

2012-08-31 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello everyone, Due to various reasons, the final phase (review, review-review, review-review-review, etc.) of the development of the patches at #8899 happened on trac and not on the sage-combinat queue. I just included the final patch in the queue, but ... - If you are working with sage-5.2,

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] importing patches from #8899 (NCSF/QSym)

2012-08-31 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote: Due to various reasons, the final phase (review, review-review, review-review-review, etc.) of the development of the patches at #8899 happened on trac and not on the sage-combinat queue. I just included the final patch in the

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] importing patches from #8899 (NCSF/QSym)

2012-08-31 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Franco, Thanks so much for doing this! Is it too late to incorporate the change ... on basis ... to ... in basis... to conform with #13404? I guess this could wait for another patch. Best, Anne On 8/31/12 2:16 PM, Franco Saliola wrote: Hello everyone, Due to various reasons, the final