[sage-combinat-devel] lazily importing the cluster stuff?

Hi, Robert Bradshaw asked if we could lazily import all the cluster stuff, and I somewhat agree (without really knowing all deeper implications). Do we already have some "standard procedure" to do that with the combinat stuff? I was about to replace from cluster_algebra_quiver.all import * by

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] importing patches from #8899 (NCSF/QSym)

Hi Franco, Thanks so much for doing this! Is it too late to incorporate the change "... on basis ..." to "... in basis..." to conform with #13404? I guess this could wait for another patch. Best, Anne On 8/31/12 2:16 PM, Franco Saliola wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Due to various reasons, the f

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] importing patches from #8899 (NCSF/QSym)

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote: > Due to various reasons, the final phase (review, review-review, > review-review-review, etc.) of the development of the patches at #8899 > happened on trac and not on the sage-combinat queue. I just included > the final patch in the

[sage-combinat-devel] importing patches from #8899 (NCSF/QSym)

Hello everyone, Due to various reasons, the final phase (review, review-review, review-review-review, etc.) of the development of the patches at #8899 happened on trac and not on the sage-combinat queue. I just included the final patch in the queue, but ... - If you are working with sage-5.2, the

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Who is the owner of trac_9280-graded-algebras-example.patch?

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:10:55AM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote: > I suspect it is Nicolas Thiéry, and if so, can I take over the patch? Please do!!! Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- You received this message because you

[sage-combinat-devel] Who is the owner of trac_9280-graded-algebras-example.patch?

Who is the owner of trac_9280-graded-algebras-example.patch? I suspect it is Nicolas Thiéry, and if so, can I take over the patch? Franco -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-comb

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Names for the bases of symmetric functions

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:08:30AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > Ok, final vote ... > > homogeneous complete homegeneous complete To summarize there was a majority for "homogeneous" over "complete", and everybody could live with "complete homogeneous", but was finding it long. S

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] queue broken

Hi Anne, > sage -hg qselect > sage -hg qpush -a I don't know why I constantly forget to do so. Thanks for the reminder... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegro