Sorry, Jean-Yves is correct: with the **full** queue applied
StandardTableaux was broken.
This was my fault and it is now fixed:
┌┐
│ Sage Version 5.12, Release Date: 2013-10-07│
│ Type notebook() for the
OK, thanks. It works now.
But new problems arise. Now that I can get my hands on standard tableaux, I
call a function written a few months ago,
which uses t.descents(). It does not work anymore, the output of t.descents
has changed type
in the meantime, and the doc mentions
Warning: This
This seems to come from the patch http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7983
which was merged in 5.12.
Perhaps what you want is now given by standard_descents() which is included
in the same patch:
sage: StandardTableau( [[1,3,4],[2,5]] ).standard_descents()
[1, 4]
sage: StandardTableau(
Hi,
I am trying to identify a bug in the symmetric function package and I am
stuck now that I think that it is in the spkg for symmetrica.
My tracking of the bug (over the course of the last 24 hours) is documented
in ticket #13413.
I now believe that the error is in symmetrica but I can't
Step 1:
use the make file in the src directory and not in the patches directory as
I was.
That is:
% cd symmetrica/symmetrica-2.0.p7/src
Step 2:
There is a line in the makefile that uses cc for the compiler rather than
gcc
I changed this line to gcc and it compiles a lot more of the files
There is more:
Step 3:
% make test
Step 4:
run the program but make sure it is in your path:
% ./test
SYMMETRICA VERSION 3.0 - STARTING
Thu Feb 26 14:58:10 MET 1998
integerobject
5
120
SYMMETRICA VERSION 3.0 - ENDING
last changed: Thu Feb 26 14:58:10 MET 1998
Note that I entered 5 and
Hi Darij,
I've not yet needed descent sets of tableaux in sage so I don't know what
the code did previously or what it does now in this respect. I would hope,
however, that a descents method for tableaux would return the descent set
of a tableau, so if you have ensured that this is now
If your test.c is
scan(POW_SYM,a);
scan(INTEGER, c);
t_POWSYM_SCHUR(a, b);
println(b);
then you still get the wrong answer so the problem is somewhere in Symmetrica.
--Mike
--Mike
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Mike Zabrocki mike.zabro...@gmail.com wrote:
There is more:
Step 3:
% make
