>> Should I modify Christian's patch file directly?
>> I assume this means that I just delete that hunk from his
>> patch file.
>
> Yes, that's what I would do. Just remove that piece directly from the
> patch in /sage-combinat/.hg/patches as long as Christian does not have
> any local modification
Hi Mark,
> Should I modify Christian's patch file directly?
> I assume this means that I just delete that hunk from his
> patch file.
Yes, that's what I would do. Just remove that piece directly from the
patch in /sage-combinat/.hg/patches as long as Christian does not have
any local modification
Christian and Nicolas,
Thanks for all the info.
>> > If not I will delete apply_demazure_simple_reflection
>> > and use apply_simple_projection instead, with the renamed
>> > option length_increasing.
When I did this (including deprecation stuff)
I got a very mild conflict with Christian's
trac_
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:03:44AM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
> > The queue applies now :)
Cool!
> > Yes. I never looked at this method because it sounds different
> > than what I was doing. I want to change the option
> > "toward_max" to "length_increasing". Will anyone be b
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:12 AM, wrote:
> Nicolas,
>
> The queue applies now :)
>
>> I am about to push another reviewer's patch which fixes some little
>> documentation compilation errors.
>
> I'll fold it in. Thanks!
>
>> By the way: ``apply_demazure_simple_reflection`` does the same as
>> ``ap
Nicolas,
The queue applies now :)
> I am about to push another reviewer's patch which fixes some little
> documentation compilation errors.
I'll fold it in. Thanks!
> By the way: ``apply_demazure_simple_reflection`` does the same as
> ``apply_simple_projection``, right?
Yes. I never looked at
Hi Mark!
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:14:03AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> ... About trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch
I am about to push another reviewer's patch which fixes some little
documentation compilation errors. You can fold it in your patch by
issuing:
hg qfold trac_12774-
>> I've hit this kind of coercion/conversion problem several times
>> already (Thanks, Simon, for explanations). I want to define an
>> operation "over integers". But it is only directly defined "over
>> rationals". But I have a proof that the answer is "integral". I'd
>> like to have a way to a
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0700, Mark Shimozono wrote:
> > One issue: the method `weyl_action`, and many others in
> > RootLatticeRealizations, will generalize right away to the geometric
> > realization of any Coxeter group. Granted, RootLatticeRealizations is
> > a misnomer since the roo
Nicolas,
Thanks for your speedy response!
I made the requested modifications and pushed.
> One issue: the method `weyl_action`, and many others in
> RootLatticeRealizations, will generalize right away to the geometric
> realization of any Coxeter group. Granted, RootLatticeRealizations is
> a mis
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 05:17:39PM -0700, Mark Shimozono wrote:
> Could you please have a look at the brand-new version
> on the sage-combinat server, of trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch
> sage/combinat/root_system/root_lattice_realizations.py
> line 1759, method weyl_action? (Particularly the way I try
Nicolas,
Could you please have a look at the brand-new version
on the sage-combinat server, of trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch
sage/combinat/root_system/root_lattice_realizations.py
line 1759, method weyl_action? (Particularly the way I try
to do the type checking that is needed due to the
easier-to-u
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:30:14AM +, Simon King wrote:
> > «change the status of the ticket to *needs review* and change the milestone
> > to sage-duplictate/invalid/wontfix.
> > You should also comment on the ticket, explaining why it should be closed.»
>
> Really "needs review"?? I was tol
Hi Nicolas!
On 2012-03-29, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:01:26AM -0400, msh...@math.vt.edu wrote:
>> I added the comment on #11122 but don't know how to change its
>> status to "already done" or whatever it should be.
>
> From:
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac
14 matches
Mail list logo
