Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-28 Thread Jason Bandlow
On 03/28/2011 11:33 AM, Daniel Bump wrote: > Someone claimed there is a bug in schensted_insert. See: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8322 > > I do not know if they are correct. Thanks for pointing this out, Dan; I wasn't aware of this ticket. I don't believe the ticket is correct,

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-28 Thread Daniel Bump
> A lot of methods for tableaux are in the Tableau class which only make > sense for semistandard tableaux, such as `bump` or `schensted_insertion`. Someone claimed there is a bug in schensted_insert. See: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8322 I do not know if they are correct. Dan -

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-28 Thread Jason Bandlow
>> Yes, I know, that's where the smiley came from... I should have asked >> more plainly: isn't there a class for semistandard tableaux? > > A lot of methods for tableaux are in the Tableau class which only make > sense for semistandard tableaux, such as `bump` or `schensted_insertion`. For what

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-28 Thread Anne Schilling
On 3/28/11 7:05 AM, Martin Rubey wrote: Anne Schilling writes: Hi Martin, Promotion is defined on semistandard tableaux over the totally ordered alphabet say {1,2,...,n+1}. Your example below sage: t = Tableau([[3, 2, 1]]) is not a semistandard tableau since it is decreasing in its row. Bef

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-28 Thread Martin Rubey
Anne Schilling writes: > Hi Martin, > > Promotion is defined on semistandard tableaux over the totally ordered > alphabet > say {1,2,...,n+1}. Your example below > > sage: t = Tableau([[3, 2, 1]]) > > is not a semistandard tableau since it is decreasing in its row. Before > promotion > was only

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-28 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Martin, Promotion is defined on semistandard tableaux over the totally ordered alphabet say {1,2,...,n+1}. Your example below sage: t = Tableau([[3, 2, 1]]) is not a semistandard tableau since it is decreasing in its row. Before promotion was only implemented for rectangle, now it is suppos

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-27 Thread Martin Rubey
Anne Schilling writes: > Hi! > > I just added a new patch on trac which implements the Schuetzenberger > involution on both words and tableaux and also the promotion operator > on tableaux of arbitrary shape: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10446 I found that it doesn't work for ar

[sage-combinat-devel] Schuetzenberger involution and promotion operator

2011-03-27 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi! I just added a new patch on trac which implements the Schuetzenberger involution on both words and tableaux and also the promotion operator on tableaux of arbitrary shape: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10446 This was started during Sage Days 26 in Seattle last December with Erin