Hi Travis,
I think you broke the queue with sage-5.9.rc1. Could you please fix it
immediately since we are working
on patches. Perhaps you could put your patches further down in the queue to
avoid
these issues?
applying disable_lazy_import_warning-nt.patch
applying trac_10963-more_functorial_co
Ok,thanks!
Just today there was another broken spot in the queue. (I upgraded to
5.8rc0 just in case, too.) I was wanting to rebase my affine permutations
patch for the new documentation system so that it can finally get a review,
and it was under the broken patch, so I just made the fixes an
Hi Tom,
Yes, I got the same error with sage-5.8.bet4. I rebased Ben Salisbury's patch.
It should work now.
Ben, please pull from the sage-combinat server before you keep working on your
patch!
Best,
Anne
On 3/15/13 2:51 PM, tom d wrote:
> From tonight's attempt to apply the queue in Sage 5.7r
>From tonight's attempt to apply the queue in Sage 5.7rc0:
applying trac_4327-root_system_plot_refactor-nt.patch
patching file sage/combinat/root_system/type_affine.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 237 with fuzz 2 (offset -54 lines).
applying trac_14143-alcove-path-al.patch
applying trac_14192-infinity_c
Hello,
The sage -combinat install failed for my sage-5.7 freshly installed with
applying trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch
patching file sage/categories/category_singleton.pyx
Hunk #3 FAILED at 277
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/categories/category_singleton.pyx.rej
Hi Travis,
Thank you for your work on this.
> I did the quick rebase of #14090 over #11490.
>
> I also had to do some minor rebasing of the following patches:
>
> trac_12876_category-fix_abstract_class-nt-rel11521.patch over #9235.
>
> trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch and
> trac_10963
Hey Nicolas,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:17:34 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> I'll check as soon as I get in that trac_13872-RC_bijections-ts.patch
> still applies and reupload #13605 to trac. However on 5.8.beta1, I get this
> reject:
>
> patching file doc/en/thematic_tutorials/index
I'll check as soon as I get in that trac_13872-RC_bijections-ts.patch still
applies and reupload #13605 to trac. However on 5.8.beta1, I get this
reject:
patching file doc/en/thematic_tutorials/index.rst
Hunk #1 FAILED at 4
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
doc/en/thematic_tutor
Hello Nicolas,
Thank you for the quick fix!
Take care,
Franco
--
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:01:52PM -0500, Franco Saliola wrote:
> >$ sage -v
> >Sage Version 5.7, Release Date: 2013-02-19
> >$ sage -combinat update
> >
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:58:29PM -0500, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> PS: Travis, I allowed myself to trim out the following trivial hunk
> out of trac_13605-partition_options-ts.patch
There it is ...
diff --git a/sage/combinat/rigged_configurations/rigged_configurations.py
b/sage/combinat/rigged
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:01:52PM -0500, Franco Saliola wrote:
>$ sage -v
>Sage Version 5.7, Release Date: 2013-02-19
>$ sage -combinat update
>...
>applying trac_13605-partition_options-ts.patch
>patching file sage/combinat/rigged_configurations/rigged_configurations.py
>
$ sage -v
Sage Version 5.7, Release Date: 2013-02-19
$ sage -combinat update
...
applying trac_13605-partition_options-ts.patch
patching file sage/combinat/rigged_configurations/rigged_configurations.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 930
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/combinat/rigged_co
> sage -combinat install
...
des erreurs se sont produites durant l'application, veuillez corriger puis
rafraîchir *trac_6495-part1-moving-files-link.patch*
> hg qpush -a
...
des erreurs se sont produites durant l'application, veuillez corriger puis
rafraîchir *trac_6495_separate_inventory.patch*
Hi,
It seems that in the series file #13862 is incorrectly marked for merging
in 5.7.beta2 whereas trac says that it is merged in 5.6-beta2. As a
consequence, the queue does not currently apply to 5.6.
I will update the series file and push the change to the queue. Anyone who
objects is free
Hi!
The sage-combinat queue currently seems broken with sage-5.6.rc0:
applying trac_10193-graded_enumerated_sets-nt.patch
patching file sage/combinat/integer_vector_weighted.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 0
Hunk #4 FAILED at 199
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/combinat/integer_vecto
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 07:47:44AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Unfortunately, nobody can push until Nicolas fixes his patches!
Oops, sorry, there was a missing guard on the patch I had just
added. Well, it was an easy fix. Pushed.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. T
Franco Saliola writes:
> It's not clear what you are desperate for. The command
I need some of the patches...
> if you just want a working version old of the queue, the following might work
>
> cd SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-combinat
> sage -hg update -r XXX
> sage -hg qpop -a
> sage -hg qpush -a
>
>
hg update -r 7570:f738ef433157
works with sage-5.3. Unfortunately, nobody can push until Nicolas fixes his
patches!
Best,
Anne
On 9/18/12 7:20 AM, Christian Stump wrote:
>> I'm rather desperate (I didn't update because I needed a stable
>> environment, but now it seems that the operating syste
> I'm rather desperate (I didn't update because I needed a stable
> environment, but now it seems that the operating system was updated
> :-())
if you just want a working version old of the queue, the following might work
cd SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-combinat
sage -hg update -r XXX
sage -hg qpop -a
sa
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Martin Rubey
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just installed sage 5.3 from source and did
>
> sage -combinat install
>
> and got
>
> patching file sage/categories/category.py
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 1803
> 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> sage/categories/ca
Hi there,
I just installed sage 5.3 from source and did
sage -combinat install
and got
patching file sage/categories/category.py
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1803
1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/categories/category.py.rej
unable to find 'sage/categories/category_with_axiom.py' for p
Hi Anne,
> sage -hg qselect
> sage -hg qpush -a
I don't know why I constantly forget to do so. Thanks for the reminder...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegro
Hi Christian,
Did you try
sage -hg qselect
and then
sage -hg qpush -a
I had changed the guards on trac_11305-rigged_configurations-ts.patch
and the patch trac_13403-bijection_KR_crystals_tableaux-ts.patch is based
on it.
That's what happened for me the first time I applied the queue after the
Hi,
trac_13403-bijection_KR_crystals_tableaux-ts.patch doesn't apply on
5.2 . Since it is the newest version, we might want the queue to apply
there (even if most people updated to 5.3.??? already - I am now doing
so with 5.3.rc0).
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Hi!
The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1.
Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch, so Chris,
did you make changes since that break the queue?
Thanks,
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to t
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:24:38PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> On 5/21/12 12:52 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > --
> > To avoid import loops, I try to stick to the following order:
> >
> > - Python modules
> > - Misc
On 5/21/12 12:52 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:32:02AM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
>> Or are categories always considered to be "lower" ?
>
> Taken from:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/msg/15221ad8016af193
> (which btw should be discussed on sag
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:55:15AM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
> thx, but don't forget to push, please!
Good point :-) Done.
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
> "Fixed". See other thread (NCSF/trac_12940_affine_permutations-td.patch)
thx, but don't forget to push, please!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:36:57AM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
> unfortunately, the queue is still broken at
> trac_12940_affine_permutations-td.patch.
"Fixed". See other thread (NCSF/trac_12940_affine_permutations-td.patch)
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
h
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:32:02AM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
> Or are categories always considered to be "lower" ?
Taken from:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/msg/15221ad8016af193
(which btw should be discussed on sage-devel and put in the dev manual)
--
Hi,
unfortunately, the queue is still broken at
trac_12940_affine_permutations-td.patch.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
Hi!
> There is a break in sage between patch
>
> trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch
> trac_8327_universal_cyclotomic_field-cs.patch
fixed -- it was actually Mark closing the last link for the import
loop by importing
from sage.graphs.digraph import DiGraph
in categories/weyl_groups. I upda
Hi!
There is a break in sage between patch
trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch
and
trac_8327_universal_cyclotomic_field-cs.patch
Christian or Nicolas, could you please fix this in your patches?
Thanks,
Anne
Removing
/Applications/sage-5.0/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage-0.0.0-
On 5/13/12 10:32 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Following advice of Volker, I installed 5.0rc1. This install went
> fine. However, the combinat queue does not apply:
>
> patching file sage/combinat/partition.py
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 428
> 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> sage/combina
On 5/13/12 10:54 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Anne Schilling writes:
>
>> On 5/13/12 10:32 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>>> Following advice of Volker, I installed 5.0rc1. This install went
>>> fine. However, the combinat queue does not apply:
>>>
>>> patching file sage/combinat/partition.py
>>> Hunk #
Anne Schilling writes:
> On 5/13/12 10:32 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>> Following advice of Volker, I installed 5.0rc1. This install went
>> fine. However, the combinat queue does not apply:
>>
>> patching file sage/combinat/partition.py
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 428
>> 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- savi
On 5/13/12 10:32 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Following advice of Volker, I installed 5.0rc1. This install went
> fine. However, the combinat queue does not apply:
>
> patching file sage/combinat/partition.py
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 428
> 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> sage/combina
Following advice of Volker, I installed 5.0rc1. This install went
fine. However, the combinat queue does not apply:
patching file sage/combinat/partition.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 428
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
sage/combinat/partition.py.rej
patch failed, unable to continue (tr
Salut,
trac_10335-permgroup_domain-mh does not apply properly on 6.4.1.
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Sorry,
Due to conflict with trac_8898 the combinat queue is currently
broken... wait few minutes before pull and push.
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@goog
41 matches
Mail list logo
