Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: StandardTableaux broken

2013-10-17 Thread Jean-Yves Thibon
Hi Darij, I still have a sage-5.4.1 with all combinat patches up to december 2012 on another machine, and t.descents() does what I expect. I admit that descents is a bad name for this (these are the descents of the inverse permutation of the row reading in French convention, in French we use

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: StandardTableaux broken

2013-10-17 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi Jean-Yves and everyone, OK, so it seems that some patch on the sage-combinat queue as of sage-5.4.1 solved the descents() problem in a more radical way than my sage-main patch. When my patch got merged into sage-main, the sage-combinat page would no longer apply, and so descents() once again

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: StandardTableaux broken

2013-10-17 Thread Anne Schilling
Perhaps I can add a couple of words to Andrew's answer: I guess that the short (but harsh) answer is that if you have code which relies upon some one else's code which is in the queue, but which is not yet merged into sage, then there is no guarantee that your code will work next year, or

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: StandardTableaux broken

2013-10-17 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Andrew and Jean-Yves, Looking at the patch queue, robinson_schensted_inverse was depreciated in trac8392 http://trac.sagemath.org/attachment/ticket/8392. It seems to have been replaced with RSK_inverse which just seems wrong to me: with tab-completion I don't see the need for random

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: StandardTableaux broken

2013-10-16 Thread Andrew Mathas
Hi Darij, I've not yet needed descent sets of tableaux in sage so I don't know what the code did previously or what it does now in this respect. I would hope, however, that a descents method for tableaux would return the descent set of a tableau, so if you have ensured that this is now