[sage-devel] Re: PolyBoRi integration

2007-12-05 Thread Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:11 , William Stein wrote: > >>> Hey, it failed for me :-) on ubuntu 32-bit linux: >> >> I removed the pushd and popd, apparently they are bashisms. >> >> Here is the new package: >> >> http://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/people/berocal/sage/polybori-0.1-r4.spkg > > I've update

[sage-devel] latex in notebook

2007-12-05 Thread fwc
A problem with latex processing in a notebook (otherwise a brilliant feature): Evaluating the input cell: %latex $y=\sin x$ % end of input tries to process the TeX file: \documentclass{article}\usepackage{fullpage}\usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{gr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 12:53 pm, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:48:19 mabshoff yazmıştı: > > > I just love it when I wake up and somebody has come up with a cleaner > > patch than I did. Do you mind if I forward this to gmp-bugs in your > > Name? > > The patch is fro

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread Ismail Dönmez
Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:53:15 Ismail Dönmez yazmıştı: > GMP 4.2.2 which is GPLv3 This should say LGPLv3 of course. -- Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 6:34 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all, > > On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:07 , mabshoff wrote: > > [snip] > > > Those are all cause by mwrank. The issue seems to be the same issue as > > Justin Walker reported in the 2.8.15 thread in sage-support. > > Interestingly no

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 10:17 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can explain Robert's error. > > When I adapted the code so as to compile with gcc4,2, one function > whose signature changed is initprimes() since gcc4,2 complained about > char* parameters. This was changed in the (new) cremona*

[sage-devel] Re: PolyBoRi integration

2007-12-05 Thread Michael Brickenstein
There is no policy. Fee free to do so :-). On 5 Dez., 10:59, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED] darmstadt.de> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:57 , Burcin Erocal wrote: > > > > > Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all > > complete. I know one way of crashing it, tr

[sage-devel] Re: PolyBoRi integration

2007-12-05 Thread Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:57 , Burcin Erocal wrote: Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all complete. I know one way of crashing it, try to use BooleSet iterators. I just built it and will do some preliminary testing today! Thanks for your work! Comments, suggest

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
I can explain Robert's error. When I adapted the code so as to compile with gcc4,2, one function whose signature changed is initprimes() since gcc4,2 complained about char* parameters. This was changed in the (new) cremona* package, but has not been changed in the (old) mwrank* package, which sh

[sage-devel] Re: Breaking News: Trophees du Libre

2007-12-05 Thread Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
On Nov 29, 2007, at 20:07 , Martin Albrecht wrote: ... we won! Just catching up with sage-devel, that's why I'm late: Congratulations Awesome! Cheers, Ralf smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
Since it seems that most of the problems everyone now has are caused by the mwrank.spkg -> cremona.spkg switchover, and given that 99.9% of the extra functionality has not yet been wrapped into Sage and is hence unavailable from Sage anyway, why don't we just chuck out the cremona.spkg into an opt

[sage-devel] Re: PolyBoRi integration

2007-12-05 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Dec 5, 2007, at 02:01 , Michael Brickenstein wrote: > > There is no policy. Fee free to do so :-). Please, no! Don't cross-post. Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds --- I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish. --

[sage-devel] Re: R Statistics Package into Sage !?

2007-12-05 Thread mhampton
I was too busy for the last couple of weeks to help seriously with this, but I did try to install it on my PPC apple laptop and my Intel OS X 10.4 desktop. It failed on both; the PPC problem is probably the same as you mentioned. I will post the errors from the intel machine when I get a chance.

[sage-devel] Re: build failure using clisp

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 6:06 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 8:54 AM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > William, > > > Do you recall why you explicity set the following option: > > > ./makemake --without-dynamic-ffi ... > > > in clisp-2.41.p11/spkg-install ? Is it re

[sage-devel] Re: [Singular-team] multi-variate polynomial factorization

2007-12-05 Thread Joel B. Mohler
Hi (I'm sending this to sage-devel as well -- there's a bunch of interest there to get our multivariate stuff up to speed), I've put some examples of things that are slow up at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jbmohler/singular/ These are things that I ran into just this morning in my compu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Dec 5, 2007, at 10:46 AM, John Cremona wrote: >>> #1058 the mwrank interface barfs on bad input > > This is a triviality. mwrank_elliptic curves need to be initialized > with 5 integers, period. Currently Sage just tried to coerce the 5 > things to integers, whcih some stupid results (e.g.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 10:21 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 5, 4:55 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since it seems that most of the problems everyone now has are caused > > by the mwrank.spkg -> cremona.spkg switchover, and given that 99.9% of > > the extra functi

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself. > The cremona.spkg contains everything that mwrank.spkg did. So whoever > put mwrank into Sage That would be me when I visited you for a day in Nottingham > 2 y

[sage-devel] Re: PolyBoRi integration

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 1:36 AM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But anyway, I think we can put the issue about PolyBoRi taking too > long to build at rest. :) OK, put to rest. And off-list Michael Brickenstein sent me some applications of PolyBoRi to a paper I wrote in grad school 11

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
On 05/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself. > > The cremona.spkg contains everything that mwrank.spkg did. So whoever > > put mwrank into Sage

[sage-devel] Re: latex in notebook

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
Thanks! I've made this trac #1404: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1404 so it will get in Sage soon. On Dec 5, 2007 2:01 AM, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A problem with latex processing in a notebook (otherwise a brilliant > feature): > > > Evaluating the input cell: > > %latex >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 7:46 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > mwrank compiles with gcc 4.2, so that has never been a problem. I am > > > not sure who fixed it, but the changes should have certainly flown > > If you mean, who fixed my source to compile ok under 4.2 then that was me. Ok, I w

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 4:55 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since it seems that most of the problems everyone now has are caused > by the mwrank.spkg -> cremona.spkg switchover, and given that 99.9% of > the extra functionality has not yet been wrapped into Sage and is > hence unavailable fro

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
Actually there are two different errors we are hunting here --- when you sent me two backtraces about 12 hours ago there was one for each. One is the apparent referenceing of uninitialized memory, somwhere around line 900 of qcurves/sieve_search.cc (I'm being imprecise since I have been adding do

[sage-devel] Re: implementation of Rencontres numbers

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
It seems like email are getting lost on the way to sage-devel: Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > However, what we do in Aldor-Combinat cannot be done so elegantly in any > > other language I know off. We learned a lot from MuPAD-combinat, but our > > design is completely different from MC, since Aldor

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 10:15 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 05/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself. > > > The cremona.sp

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
I have fixed the smallest of the mwrank/g0n issues in trac # 1403; patch attached to the trac. This could be applied to either qrank/getcurve.cc in the new cremona package, or to getcurve.cc in the old mwrank package. On to the next one! John On 05/12/2007, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 8:58 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello John, > Actually there are two different errors we are hunting here --- when > you sent me two backtraces about 12 hours ago there was one for each. The one without symbols was mwrank from mwrank.spkg, the second one with [som

[sage-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: build failure using clisp

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 8:54 AM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William, > > Do you recall why you explicity set the following option: > > ./makemake --without-dynamic-ffi ... > > in clisp-2.41.p11/spkg-install ? Is it required for some other parts of Sage? > > For the purposes of building the fu

[sage-devel] Re: [Aldor-combinat-devel] [sage-devel] Re: implementation of Rencontres numbers

2007-12-05 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
>> Is there a problem with the license of the aldor compiler >> (aldor-combinat itself is GPL2). > > Yep, I believe so. From the website; Version 1.1 of Aldor has been > released in source form under the Aldor Public License 2.0. This allows > free non-commercial use, modification and re-distribu

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself. The cremona.spkg contains everything that mwrank.spkg did. So whoever put mwrank into Sage could make some small changes and get mwrank to do the same. The executables files (e.g. the mwrank stand-alone program) should still be b

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE-2.8.15!

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 7:20 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 10:15 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 05/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm sure that c

[sage-devel] Re: build failure using clisp

2007-12-05 Thread Bill Page
On 12/5/07, mabshoff wrote: > > The build fails on OSX without that option. Interestingly enough we do > not run makemake with the recommended options. I "fixed" that once a > couple months ago, but we reverted the changes because of the above > mentioned breakage on OSX. > > clisp 2.43 is out and

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread John Cremona
> > > > mwrank compiles with gcc 4.2, so that has never been a problem. I am > > not sure who fixed it, but the changes should have certainly flown If you mean, who fixed my source to compile ok under 4.2 then that was me. > > back into your tree. With the removal of mwrank.spkg that issue will

[sage-devel] Re: build failure using clisp

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 8:58 pm, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/5/07, mabshoff wrote: > > > The build fails on OSX without that option. Interestingly enough we do > > not run makemake with the recommended options. I "fixed" that once a > > couple months ago, but we reverted the changes because

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
Ok, I compiled NTL as well as mwrank with "-O0 -g" and the problem persists. But at least I got a better backtrace from gdb: (gdb) bt #0 0x003105830015 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x003105831980 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x2b09f1db in ghalt (c=0x2b1609a8

[sage-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: build failure using clisp

2007-12-05 Thread Bill Page
William, Do you recall why you explicity set the following option: ./makemake --without-dynamic-ffi ... in clisp-2.41.p11/spkg-install ? Is it required for some other parts of Sage? For the purposes of building the full version of Axiom using clisp it is necessary to allow '--with-dynamic-ff

[sage-devel] experimental spkg for wxPython

2007-12-05 Thread Jaap Spies
Hi, I made an experimental wxPython-2.8.7.1.spkg. It works for me on Fedora 7 and 8. Dependencies include: glib and gtk+ OpenGL or the Mesa3D library This will not work on OSX (slightly different configuration options, etc). Any testers? http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/wxPython-2.8

[sage-devel] Re: Breaking News: Trophees du Libre

2007-12-05 Thread Fabio Tonti
I'm writing with some delay too, I just wanted to congratulate you on the Trophees du Libre. ABSOLUTELY GREAT! Cheers, Fabio On Dec 5, 2007 2:56 PM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007, at 20:07 , Martin Albrecht wrote: > > > ... we won! > > Just catching up wit

[sage-devel] error when installing the Macaulay2 spkg

2007-12-05 Thread M. Miller
Hello, I am trying install the Macaulay2 package to Sage 2.8.14. I am using a PowerPC with Mac OSX 10.5.1. In doing so I get an error as shown below. I am pretty new to this. Does anyone know if there is a reasonably straightforward way to remedy this error? Thank you, Matt Miller

[sage-devel] Re: error when installing the Macaulay2 spkg

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 6, 12:18 am, "M. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying install the Macaulay2 package to Sage 2.8.14. I am using > a PowerPC with Mac OSX 10.5.1. In doing so I get an error as shown > below. I am pretty new to this. Does anyone know if there is a > reasonably stra

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread Ismail Dönmez
Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:48:19 mabshoff yazmıştı: > I just love it when I wake up and somebody has come up with a cleaner > patch than I did. Do you mind if I forward this to gmp-bugs in your > Name? The patch is from OpenSuse and should be already fixed in GMP 4.2.2 which is GPLv3 now so c

[sage-devel] Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread Robert Miller
Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the internals here. Is this just something that is too big? {{{id=14| P = QQ[2^(1/2), 2^(1/3), 2^(1/5)] }}} {{{id=11| P.gens() /// (sqrt2, a, b) }}} {{{id=10|

[sage-devel] Re: experimental spkg for wxPython

2007-12-05 Thread Jaap Spies
Jaap Spies wrote: > Hi, > > I made an experimental wxPython-2.8.7.1.spkg. > > It works for me on Fedora 7 and 8. > On this I could build an experimental spkg for the Enthought Tool Suite I have a working mayavi2 in sage-2.8.14! Tomorrow I'll post a link. Jaap --~--~-~--~~-

[sage-devel] Re: [Aldor-combinat-devel] [sage-devel] Re: implementation of Rencontres numbers

2007-12-05 Thread Michael Abshoff
Martin Rubey wrote: > "Michael Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: [somehow Martin's reply didn't make it onto sage-devel (yet)] > >> > * licensing issues need to be sorted out since the APL2 is not >> > GPL-compatible. I don't know if it'd even be possible to distribute >> Aldor >> > as par

[sage-devel] Re: experimental spkg for wxPython

2007-12-05 Thread mhampton
Any chance of getting that to work on OS X? Or more details on what needs to be done? I've been using wxPython quite a bit lately and it would be nice to have it integrated into sage. I don't see how it could be used from the notebook easily but it might be complementary - an easy way to make s

[sage-devel] notebook problems

2007-12-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I currently have a bit of a problem. I just 1. installed imagemagick and then 2. upgraded my sage. Also, I am on vmware. The problem I'm having is that I type in 'notebook' at the prompt and the vmware notebook screen appears for 2-3 seconds and then returns me to the prompt and it do

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 5, 7:39 am, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wednesday 05 December 2007 06:07:03 mabshoff yazmıştı: > > > gmp: > [...] > > * uncomment std::FILE -> causes trouble - need clean fix > Hello Ismail > See attached patch. > I just love it when I wake up and somebody has come up w

[sage-devel] Re: notebook problems

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 5:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, >I currently have a bit of a problem. I just 1. installed > imagemagick and then 2. upgraded my sage. Also, I am on vmware. The > problem I'm having is that I type in 'notebook' at the prompt and the > vmware no

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread Carl Witty
On Dec 5, 4:17 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > internals here. Is this just something that is too big? Just for fun, I took a look at wha

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 6, 3:04 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 4:17 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > > internals here. Is thi

[sage-devel] Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
Hello, the release cycle has started and so far only 5 tickets were closed. Since we update clisp (which is tricky) and also updated cremona.spkg to take over the functionality of mwrank this might be a little rough to get right on the first try. The tarball is available at http://sage.math.wash

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 7:07 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > the release cycle has started and so far only 5 tickets were closed. > Since we update clisp (which is tricky) and also updated cremona.spkg > to take over the functionality of mwrank this might be a little > rough to get r

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Dec 5, 2007, at 7:07 PM, mabshoff wrote: > Tickets with negative review: > #1189 [with patch, with negative review] SymPy <-> SAGE automatic > conversion I will look into this one. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@g

[sage-devel] Re: Open for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Dec 5, 2007 4:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the > internals here. Is this just something that is too big? > > {{{id=14| > P = QQ[2^(1/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
Arrg, this isn't going to well so far. * the cremona.spkg in alpha0 is the old version, you need http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/cremona-20071124.p3.spkg * Carl reported a clisp build failure with gcc version 4.2.3 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3), but I guess he will pos

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread Carl Witty
On Dec 5, 9:15 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > * Carl reported a clisp build failure with gcc version 4.2.3 > 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3), but I guess he will post > details later. Details! On my Debian testing 32-bit x86 Linux laptop, the clisp build failed. T

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 6, 6:15 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > Arrg, this isn't going to well so far. > > * the cremona.spkg in alpha0 is the old version, you need > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/cremona-20071124.p3.spkg > And with http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread Ismail Dönmez
Thursday 06 December 2007 08:03:48 Carl Witty yazmıştı: > On Dec 5, 9:15 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: > > * Carl reported a clisp build failure with gcc version 4.2.3 > > 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3), but I guess he will post > > details later. > > Details!

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-2.9.alpha0 released, request for reviews

2007-12-05 Thread Carl Witty
On Dec 5, 10:06 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > And with > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/Sage-2.9.alpha1-fix-cremona-upgrade-doctest-failout.patch > > all doctests on a new install finally pass for me. This was much more > painful than I thought. Unfortunat

[sage-devel] Fwd: SAGE in University Week

2007-12-05 Thread William Stein
Hi, The local university magazine has a store about Sage at http://uwnews.org/uweek/uweekarticle.asp?articleID=38415 -- William I didn't write the article, but I've created a digg link to it: http://digg.com/software/Free_Open_Source_Mathematics_Software I think the only way this will