Some of you may be wondering how the new coercion model is coming
along. After a heroic effort by many people at Dev Days 1, and a
little followup work, we managed to merge the coercion branch into
3.0.3 and got all doctests to pass with the exception of /modular
and /schemes/generic. It h
On Jul 18, 1:01 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> Following Ansrzej's report I tried the same thing. For me the test
> always takes 2.0-2.1s but the 5th or 6th time I got the failure:
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py
>
Hello folks,
we finally have working mirrors again, but since we moved a lot of
files around most mirrors not sage.math are still catching up since
they all have to mirror 28GB. Be patient and everything should be back
to normal in a day or two. Apologies for breaking the mirrors, I hope
it won'
Thanks so much William!
No I am not talking about the worksheets but the notebook.
What confused me was that a UserDatabase looked like
the place were all the users were being stored. I saw user.py
but that doesn't have a container class. There is clearly some
redundancy between UserRecord and Us
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Michael_D_G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks so much William!
>
> No I am not talking about the worksheets but the notebook.
> What confused me was that a UserDatabase looked like
> the place were all the users were being stored. I saw user.py
> but that doesn
Michael_D_G a écrit :
> Thanks so much William!
>
>
Hello,
I have posted some questions about ldap identification in Sage (in the
notebook), and I started to look a bit more in details... But it seems
that you are much more advanced than me (I'm absolutely not a specialist
of ldap programi
2008/7/17 Kurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Jul 16, 2:39 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > I have a class which represents the set of words over an alphabet (but
>> > is not a Monoïd since it also contains infinite words) and another
>> > class which represents a word. These class
Following Ansrzej's report I tried the same thing. For me the test
always takes 2.0-2.1s but the 5th or 6th time I got the failure:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py
**
File "/home/jec/sage-3.0.6.alpha0/tmp/ssmod.py"
On Jul 17, 11:23 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:31 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:11 AM, John H Palmieri
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 17, 4:51 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Jul 17, 3:30
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> 2008/7/17 Kurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2:39 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
I have a class which represents the set of words over an
alphabet (but
is not a Monoïd since it also contains infinite w
On Jul 18, 2008, at 8:05 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Jul 17, 11:23 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:31 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:11 AM, John H Palmieri
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
On Jul 17, 4:51 pm, Ca
Hi,
the following might be interesting for some people around here. As
time permits I will offer an optional spkg.
Cheers,
Michael
Original Message
Subject: [atlas-devel] ATLAS 3.9.0 & LAPACK
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:19:10 -0500
From: Clint Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-T
Hello Sage folks, as promised in my last website posting [1], here a
bit more how things evolved.
First, since there is some tracking going on, and I have a bit more
than two weeks to compare, I can make some trends and analysis.
The first thing is, that the visitors come and go very stable. Duri
On Jul 18, 12:24 pm, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Clement,
> I am looking into it.
Thanks. We are still not 100% certain that the probabilistic charpoly
mod p is at fault here, but it can't hurt to take a look.
> Applying the patch
> athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/pern
Robert --
I'm afraid that I did not take detailed notes of your talk at Dev Days
1.
Is there documentation that shows how one ought to now implement
coercion for brand new code?
Perhaps a good example that we can all look to for guidance?
-- Kurt
On Jul 17, 11:25 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PR
On Jul 18, 12:33 pm, "Harald Schilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Harald,
> Hello Sage folks, as promised in my last website posting [1], here a
> bit more how things evolved.
nice work and thanks for your continued efforts.
> First, since there is some tracking going on, and I have a bit mo
2008/7/18 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just for the record, __nonzero__ is a Python special method, nothing
> to do with Parents/Elements.
What it has to do with Elements is that the current Element class
implements it. Nothing else.
>>> But I think this discussion does bring up the
I am looking into it.
Applying the patch at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/pernet/Patches/charpoly_LUK.patch
will disable the current probablistic charpoly algorithm.
This could help diagnose the origin of the bug.
Cheers
Clement
mabshoff a écrit :
>
>
> On Jul 17, 10:34 pm, mabshoff
Hi,
I just want to let people know that I definitely plan to attend the AMS meeting
in DC in January 2009, and that there *will* be a Sage booth there.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~--
Thanks.
Besides the SAGE booth, here are other SAGE-related events at the DC meeting:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/ams-sage
http://wiki.sagemath.org/maa-sage
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:31 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just want to let people know that I definitely plan t
On Jul 18, 3:59 pm, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have applied the patch and rebuild LinBox and started running the
> > test 500 times to see. Can you guess if/how much this patch does
> > affect performance for charpoly mod p?
>
> For the dimensions you are considering (and up
> I have applied the patch and rebuild LinBox and started running the
> test 500 times to see. Can you guess if/how much this patch does
> affect performance for charpoly mod p?
>
For the dimensions you are considering (and up to a thousand) I don't
expect any performance loss.
But the probabili
On Jul 18, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Kurt wrote:
>
> Robert --
>
> I'm afraid that I did not take detailed notes of your talk at Dev
> Days 1.
> Is there documentation that shows how one ought to now implement
> coercion for brand new code?
> Perhaps a good example that we can all look to for guidance?
23 matches
Mail list logo
