Sounds good. However, I don't think that modifying sage-env, as the
trac ticket suggests, will fix things for the issue I'm discussing
here. I changed the appropriate line of sage-env to
PYTHONPATH="$SAGE_PATH:$SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python:$SAGE_PYTHONPATH"
&& export PYTHONPATH
which works, mean
On Aug 30, 8:51 pm, David Ketcheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently the problem here (what I should have thought of first) is
> that the directory containing foo.py is not in my sage python path.
> The surprising (to me) part, and the reason I didn't think of it, is
> that this breaks th
Apparently the problem here (what I should have thought of first) is
that the directory containing foo.py is not in my sage python path.
The surprising (to me) part, and the reason I didn't think of it, is
that this breaks things even if the file I'm testing is foo.py and I
try 'from foo import *
Hi Chris,
Mike Hansen and I changed the green to blue in the diff view for
patches. Could you let us know if this is better for you?
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
Sorry for not being clear. myfoo.py is the file with the docstring
examples I want to test. foo.py is the file with the modules I need
to import.
Let me add that sometimes they're the same file, and it doesn't work
in that case either.
On Aug 30, 8:08 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wr
On Aug 30, 2008, at 10:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
* Please don't make me state the problem in terms of first order
equations only. Turning this second order equation into a coupled set
of first order equations is a simple (but boring) algebraic
manipulation, and Sage should be able to do it.
On Aug 30, 2008, at 3:33 PM, David Ketcheson wrote:
>
> I'm developing a package and trying to use sage -t to automatically
> test examples I've put in the docstrings. On the documentation page
> at http://www.sagemath.org/doc/prog/node29.html it says I can do
> something like
>
> """
> EXAM
Where there is a choice, Sage should feel like traditional mathematics
when posing mathematical problems, rather than a traditional
programming language. The following interface ideas follow from that
principle. Could this be a starting point for an SEP?
Mathematicians are expected to be able t
Hi,
while looking for code to doctest Mike Hansen came across sage/libs/
pari/functional.py It is a file with 191 one line functions that
attempt to do things like the following:
def FOO(x): return pari(x).FOO()
There is no user of the code, the only file that imports it is bg.py
which is an
I'm developing a package and trying to use sage -t to automatically
test examples I've put in the docstrings. On the documentation page
at http://www.sagemath.org/doc/prog/node29.html it says I can do
something like
"""
EXAMPLES:
sage: from foo import *
"""
where foo is not part of
Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> On 30-Aug-08, at 8:09 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2:36 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Jaap,
>>
>>> Where have I seen this before?
>> the same issue hit your box before and we ended up filtering some non-
>> ascii
2008/8/30 Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Monday 11 August 2008, Bill Hart wrote:
>> BTW, the result of this is that FLINT is probably incredibly
>> inefficient as it is being used in SAGE at present. It'll be nice to
>> get this fixed, as it may speed quite a few things up.
>>
>> Bill
On 30-Aug-08, at 8:09 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2:36 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
>> Where have I seen this before?
>
> the same issue hit your box before and we ended up filtering some non-
> ascii characters out of the stream. I
On Aug 30, 2:36 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
Hi Jaap,
> Where have I seen this before?
the same issue hit your box before and we ended up filtering some non-
ascii characters out of the stream. I will dig for the ticket and see
what is turning up.
> Jaap
Che
I had 3 failures on OS X 10.5:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/octave.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_mod2_dense.pyx
I guess the octave one is now fixed and the matrix_mod2_dense.pyx is
being worked on.
sage0.py
On Monday 11 August 2008, Bill Hart wrote:
> BTW, the result of this is that FLINT is probably incredibly
> inefficient as it is being used in SAGE at present. It'll be nice to
> get this fixed, as it may speed quite a few things up.
>
> Bill.
A patch is up at:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_t
Also there are some more open source virtualization projects like
Qemu
http://bellard.org/qemu/
Bochs
http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
which are used for virtual machine versions of Reactos... Can they also be
good alternatives for Vmware?
Regards
AAP
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:26 AM, mabshoff <[EMAI
On Aug 29, 2008, at 5:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2008, at 5:01 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>> The trouble was that I wanted common code for both additive and
>> multiplicative groups, which I can -- almost-- implement. Your way,
>> we have one type of element derived from some Mult
--- a/sage-3.1.1/devel/doc-main/tut/tut.tex 2008-08-30 20:52:45.0
+1000
+++ b/sage-3.1.1/devel/doc-main/tut/tut.tex 2008-08-30 20:46:40.0
+1000
@@ -183,14 +183,14 @@
\end{itemize}%two are needed for some weird reason
-\section{Longterm Goals for \SAGE}
+\section{Long-T
Would you like me to give my talk in French? I think it is 10 years
since I last lectured in French, but it has the advantage of stopping
me speaking too fast...
John
2008/8/30 Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Saturday 30 August 2008, John Cremona wrote:
>> Perhaps the issue of docum
On Saturday 30 August 2008, John Cremona wrote:
> Perhaps the issue of documentation in French would be a suitable topic
> for the Sage Days in Nancy in October?
Will we have French lessons for the non-french speaking part of the
audience :-)
It sounds like a good idea to kick things off. Then
Perhaps the issue of documentation in French would be a suitable topic
for the Sage Days in Nancy in October?
John
2008/8/30 Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi again,
>
> to sum up the two days i spent at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School,
> i must say that my presentation of Sage produ
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here is alpha2. We fixed another boatload of small and not so small
> issues. The performance regression with plotting is fixed, but there
> are still doctesting issues with the ghmm code. We will tackle that in
> alpha3 which hopefully will be done before Doc D
>
> Mplayer plug-in didn't like it but copying the url and feeding it to mplayer
> on the command line worked fine:
> mms://a988.v101995.c10199.e.vm.akamaistream.net/7/988/10199/3f97c7e6/ftvigrp.download.akamai.com/10199/horsgv/regions/raa/HD_1900_clermont_jtregional_290808.wmv
Confirmed. Inte
24 matches
Mail list logo