On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:59 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>[...]
>> What you might do is run sage and type
>> sage: install_scripts('%s/software/bin/'%os.environ['HOME'])
>> This will, among other t
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:59 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> What you might do is run sage and type
> sage: install_scripts('%s/software/bin/'%os.environ['HOME'])
> This will, among other things, put an hg script in that directory,
> which contains this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> due to the init.sage vs. IPython SNAFU I have just released a Sage
> 3.1.4 with two additional small fixes. Sources and a sage.math only
> binary (this time tested to extract :)) are in
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.4/
>
> > yesterday, i had exactly the same idea ;)
>
> Harald, glad I wasn't the only one!
>
> > (but please make it small
> > and not very distracting).
>
> Yes, the request for small font is in the trac ticket.
>
For those who were interested in this, a patch is up for review at
http://trac.sagemat
In the documentation for inverse_laplace, we see this example:
sage: f(t) = t*cos(t)
sage: s = var('s')
sage: L = laplace(f, t, s); L
t |--> 2*s^2/(s^2 + 1)^2 - 1/(s^2 + 1)
Shouldn't that last function take the parameter s instead of t? In
other words, shoul
OK. It was just a thought. I guess it would only matter to people
were going straight to the source page but weren't following things on
this group, which is probably a small number of people.
-Marshall
On Oct 17, 8:02 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Harald Schilly wrote:
> > On O
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2..
>
> Just to make this clear: I update the webpage rather late, because it
> doesn't satisfy a normal user, if it would say 3.1.3 but ther
On Oct 17, 2:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2.
Just to make this clear: I update the webpage rather late, because it
doesn't satisfy a normal user, if it would say 3.1.3 but there are
only sources. Therefore, I
mhampton wrote:
> I wonder if it might be useful to have a "recommended" flag for the
> source. I.e., if a version is released that turns out to have some
> serious problems, mark the previous version as the recommended one,
> until a version with no serious bugs is released. This would avoid
>
I wonder if it might be useful to have a "recommended" flag for the
source. I.e., if a version is released that turns out to have some
serious problems, mark the previous version as the recommended one,
until a version with no serious bugs is released. This would avoid
the complexity of having s
Thanks Harald for adding the link to
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/sage/
But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is
there a way to get the more recent version?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
On Oct 17, 4:38 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Harald for adding the link
> tohttp://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/s...
> But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is
> there a way to get the more recent version?
3.1.4 will b
Very nice!
Bill.
On 17 Oct, 11:00, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put all my Bordeaux talks together into a single article:
>
> http://wstein.org/papers/2008-bordeaux/
>
> William
>
> --
> William Stein
> Associate Professor of Mathematics
> University of Washingtonhtt
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for the reply. Sorry, I forgot that you mentioned this
before. No hassle about the upgrades, as it's easy enough to compile
from source. Sleep well!
Stan
mabshoff wrote:
> The question is fair game here. The reason the upgrade does not work
> to 3.1.3 is that I held u
On Oct 17, 12:59 am, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> >
Hi Stan,
> > I started building binaries and am preparing to push out the release
> > for upgrades, so just don't attempt to upgrade just yet :)
>
> Perhaps this is a question for sage-support, but when I tr
Hi,
I put all my Bordeaux talks together into a single article:
http://wstein.org/papers/2008-bordeaux/
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
2008/10/17 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A few things that Craig didn't catch: :)
>
> Thanks!
>
>> page 7: the exponent should be k, not 2k
>> page 9: "since such formulas perhaps do not exist" sounds weird to me;
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> I started building binaries and am preparing to push out the release
> for upgrades, so just don't attempt to upgrade just yet :)
>
Perhaps this is a question for sage-support, but when I try to upgrade
from my sage 3.1.2, I get the message "make: Nothing to be done for
18 matches
Mail list logo
