On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:21 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Sage can't depend on pyx, because pyx requires latex. So that
> doesn't seem to be an option. Also, some of Sage's 2d plotting
> already depends quite heavily on matplotlib, e.g., contour plots.
>
> Possibly we could copy the code out of py
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:01 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> Is there any code in matplotlib for actually drawing x and y axis?
>> I mean, since you're saying their code is way better than yours
>> for doing that, maybe yo
On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:01 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>
> Is there any code in matplotlib for actually drawing x and y axis?
> I mean, since you're saying their code is way better than yours
> for doing that, maybe you can confirm they actually have code
> for doing that? :-)
>
Matplotlib is gear
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Alex Clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:03 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I think this sounds great, I give a hearty +1.
>>
>> I've gotten frustrated in the past by the plotting code. Being "more
>> closely tied to ma
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:03 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think this sounds great, I give a hearty +1.
>
> I've gotten frustrated in the past by the plotting code. Being "more
> closely tied to matplotlib" would be nice for lots of reasons.
I as well support utilizing matplotlib
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 09:23:12PM -0800, Konrad Meyer wrote:
>
> 2008/11/16 Gabriel Gellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:11:14AM -0500, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
> >>
> >> I just noticed that R seems to be using GPL v3 as of at least 2.7.1,
> >> is this an issue for SAGE?
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Gabriel Gellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just noticed that R seems to be using GPL v3 as of at least 2.7.1,
> is this an issue for SAGE?
Yes, this could be a very serious problem.
Please let us know when you get more information from the R project
about t
2008/11/16 Gabriel Gellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:11:14AM -0500, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed that R seems to be using GPL v3 as of at least 2.7.1,
>> is this an issue for SAGE?
>>
>> I get this from within R
>>
>> > RShowDoc("COPYING")
>> GNU GENER
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:11:14AM -0500, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>
> I just noticed that R seems to be using GPL v3 as of at least 2.7.1,
> is this an issue for SAGE?
>
> I get this from within R
>
> > RShowDoc("COPYING")
> GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
>Version 3, 29 June 2007
>
But
I just noticed that R seems to be using GPL v3 as of at least 2.7.1,
is this an issue for SAGE?
I get this from within R
> RShowDoc("COPYING")
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007
Gabriel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, sen
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Most other math packages out there (or at least Mma and Matlab) use
>> frames instead of just axes. What I would recommend instead of using
>> axes is to use correctly placed grids, which is done with grids(True)
>> and o
> Most other math packages out there (or at least Mma and Matlab) use
> frames instead of just axes. What I would recommend instead of using
> axes is to use correctly placed grids, which is done with grids(True)
> and one can also customize grid placement with xticks() and yticks(),
> though I do
Em Dom, 2008-11-16 às 11:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> > Additionally, I think the Graphics wrapper should not be nearly as
> > heavy as it is. In particular, there's no way to get at and modify
> > the matplotlib subplot object. For example, I have some preliminary
> > code that would let
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Kirill Smelkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 08:27:10AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
>>
>> Wow, a 29 page email! Printing it actually crashed gmail in epiphany, which
>> is
>> a new bug AFAIK, so you have potentially contributed t
> Additionally, I think the Graphics wrapper should not be nearly as
> heavy as it is. In particular, there's no way to get at and modify
> the matplotlib subplot object. For example, I have some preliminary
> code that would let one do this:
>
> sage: p = plot(e^x, 1, 5)
> sage: p.subplot.set_x
I think this sounds great, I give a hearty +1.
I've gotten frustrated in the past by the plotting code. Being "more
closely tied to matplotlib" would be nice for lots of reasons. The
matplotlib documentation is pretty good, and maybe some of what we do
could find its way upstream in Mike's appr
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Em Sex, 2008-11-14 às 16:22 -0200, Ronan Paixão escreveu:
>> I recently thought about implementing more functions used by non-math
>> people (I'm an Electronic Engineering student).
>>
>> I started by trying to m
David,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 08:27:10AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
>
> Wow, a 29 page email! Printing it actually crashed gmail in epiphany, which is
> a new bug AFAIK, so you have potentially contributed to improving google's
> gmail program:-)
Really?! If Google were Knuth, I'd receive 2.56
On Nov 17, 1:12 am, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
thx, but for the future, could you please either send me an email
(webmaster @ the bottom of the page) or issue a trac ticket
(component: website)? it's possible that I miss it if it is just
posted here.
h
--~--~-~-
On Nov 15, 2008, at 03:15 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes the slightly delayed 3.2.rc1 with some goodies from SD 11 as
> well as various fixes from Bug Day 16. There are actually *four*
> segfault fixes in this build. On top the cleanup up build system, i.e.
> massive speedups t
it seems that my last message keeps being re-posted over and over.
Nothing to do with me !!???!??
On Nov 16, 2:15 pm, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the sage-shell inside emacs, like the one started by my-sage, it
> > works with Tab in my case (and also with F2 of course)
>
> lucky you
> In the sage-shell inside emacs, like the one started by my-sage, it
> works with Tab in my case (and also with F2 of course)
lucky you ! in my case it prints a tabulation... probably something
else in my configuration (help appreciated if you have an idea)
> In a sage-buffer it does not w
> In the sage-shell inside emacs, like the one started by my-sage, it
> works with Tab in my case (and also with F2 of course)
lucky you ! in my case it prints a tabulation... probably something
else in my configuration (help appreciated if you have an idea)
> In a sage-buffer it does not w
> In the sage-shell inside emacs, like the one started by my-sage, it
> works with Tab in my case (and also with F2 of course)
lucky you ! in my case it prints a tabulation... probably something
else in my configuration (help appreciated if you have an idea)
> In a sage-buffer it does not w
it's pcomplete, not pycomplete. It's supposed to act like the TAB key
when you run SAGE in a console. So if you're in the sage buffer under
emacs, type "MatrixS" and then run M-x sage-pcomplete-or-help (or hit
F2 !) it should complete to "MatrixSpace".
On Nov 16, 12:32 pm, Thomas Kahle <[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre wrote:
> it's pcomplete, not pycomplete. It's supposed to act like the TAB key
> when you run SAGE in a console. So if you're in the sage buffer under
> emacs, type "MatrixS" and then run M-x sage-pcomplete-or-help (or hit
> F2 !) it should com
it's pcomplete, not pycomplete. It's supposed to act like the TAB key
when you run SAGE in a console. So if you're in the sage buffer under
emacs, type "MatrixS" and then run M-x sage-pcomplete-or-help (or hit
F2 !) it should complete to "MatrixSpace".
On Nov 16, 12:32 pm, Thomas Kahle <[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre wrote:
> you need to try M-x run-sage before using the sage mode. Afterwords
> everything works fine. All the commands related to python now work
> with sage instead.
>
> However you might notice the following bug: C-c C-l does not work
> anym
you need to try M-x run-sage before using the sage mode. Afterwords
everything works fine. All the commands related to python now work
with sage instead.
However you might notice the following bug: C-c C-l does not work
anymore in python mode ! and i mean even before running M-x run-
sage... at l
29 matches
Mail list logo