On Jul 12, 2:03 pm, William Stein wrote:
> 2009/7/11 Kwankyu :
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > sage: F=GF(5)
> > sage: a=F(3)*2/3; a
> > 2
> > sage: parent(a)
> > Finite Field of size 5
> > sage: 2/3*F(3)
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > ...
> > TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*
2009/7/11 Kwankyu :
>
> Hi,
>
> sage: F=GF(5)
> sage: a=F(3)*2/3; a
> 2
> sage: parent(a)
> Finite Field of size 5
> sage: 2/3*F(3)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': 'Rational Field' and
> 'Finite Field of size 5'
>
> This behavior seems
Hi,
sage: F=GF(5)
sage: a=F(3)*2/3; a
2
sage: parent(a)
Finite Field of size 5
sage: 2/3*F(3)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': 'Rational Field' and
'Finite Field of size 5'
This behavior seems irrational to me. My understanding is that
rati
That patch fixed sage-apply-ticket for me, on sage-4.1.
Thanks,
Kevin Horton
On 11 Jul 2009, at 15:21, John Cremona wrote:
>
> There is a new patch at #6511 which now has a positive review. Try
> that?
> John
>
> 2009/7/11 Kevin Horton :
>>
>> I tried using "sage -merge " to apply a pat
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:53:04 -0700
William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
> >
> > It's taken more than 12 hours to build ATLAS on t2, and it is still
> > going. William said it takes a lot less if some tuning parameters
> > are known for the machine,
Hi,
Singular definitely does have an issue with incorrect Grobner bases
due to overflow. I've been in contact with the Singular team, and they
do consider this to be a bug that they will fix. In general they want
Singular to either give a correct answer or give an error message, no
matter how Sin
There is a new patch at #6511 which now has a positive review. Try that?
John
2009/7/11 Kevin Horton :
>
> I tried using "sage -merge " to apply a patch from Trac, but it
> failed with:
>
> % sage -merge 5081
> File "/opt/sage-4.1/local/bin/sage-apply-ticket", line 464
> os.chdir(SAGE_
On Jul 11, 6:53 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
> There have been at least 1-2 recent threads on sage-devel (or
> support?) including a complete script posted by somebody about
> building multiple packages in parallel. You should search the
> archives (I don't have time now).
I think William means
On Jul 11, 1:28 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:30 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Hi Sage-Release and Sage-Combinat-Devel,
>
> > We're basically 100% done with sage-4.1, and Robert Miller will
> > officially make the sage-4.1.tar tarball available.
sage-4.1 buil
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> It's taken more than 12 hours to build ATLAS on t2, and it is still
> going. William said it takes a lot less if some tuning parameters are
> known for the machine, so it does not have to go through that again. I
> asked on the ATLAS hel
I tried using "sage -merge " to apply a patch from Trac, but it
failed with:
% sage -merge 5081
File "/opt/sage-4.1/local/bin/sage-apply-ticket", line 464
os.chdir(SAGE_ROOT+'/tmp)
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
==
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> It's taken more than 12 hours to build ATLAS on t2, and it is still
> going. William said it takes a lot less if some tuning parameters are
> known for the machine, so it does not have to go through that again. I
> asked on the ATLAS hel
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
>
>
>> Apparently, the jsMath library hides all display equations, even if they
>> are images.
>
> I find this funny: I can view the rendered equations. It's just that I
> have to refresh my browser every second. Even
Here's what I did when Atlas failed to recognise my machine:
1. Copy the SAGE_ROOT/local directory to (e.g.) /home/john/sagelocal .
2. Add
export SAGE_ATLAS_LIB="/home/john/sagelocal"
to my startup file .bashrc.
Then in all subsequent builds it finds the existing Atlas and does not
build a new
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> So my question is: Do folks agree or disagree with me Cythonizing
>
> sage/numerical/knapsack.py
>
> and implement further algorithms in Cython?
Cythonizing the module
sage/numerical/knapsack.py
is now ticket #6513:
http://trac.sagemath.o
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> Apparently, the jsMath library hides all display equations, even if they
> are images.
I find this funny: I can view the rendered equations. It's just that I
have to refresh my browser every second. Even at that rate, the
equation would on
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> as LaTeX. That's OK, I can see that the LaTeX is rendered and shows up
> in the PDF version of the standard documentation (reference manual,
> tutorial, etc.). The problem is that in Sage 4.1, that tag doesn't
> render properly, if at all, in the HTML version of the documentat
It's taken more than 12 hours to build ATLAS on t2, and it is still
going. William said it takes a lot less if some tuning parameters are
known for the machine, so it does not have to go through that again. I
asked on the ATLAS help forum, but so far no reply for how to save these
parameters.
Hi,
i've just created a simple script that creates an OS X application
bundle for Sage. The usage is pretty simple, just copy the sage
directory from the .dmg into the directory of the script and run 'make
release'.
I thought it might be usefull for people running on OS X, so i'm
sharing it with t
2009/7/11 Minh Nguyen :
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:29 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> There's a typo in the script file (a missing quote, as you can see).
>> I had that, and thought it had been fixed. You can edit that line
>> yourself and try again -- but of course someone should p
Hi folks,
When ReSTifying the documentation, my understanding is that the tag
.. MATH::
would render whatever is in
as LaTeX. That's OK, I can see that the LaTeX is rendered and shows up
in the PDF version of the standard documentation (reference manual,
tutorial, etc.). The problem is
I do get one test failure still, from a deprecation warning about
using popen2 instead of the subprocess module:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py"
/Volumes/E/sage-4.1/local/lib/python2.6/os.py:669: DeprecationWarning:
functions overriding warnings.showwarning() must support the 'lin
On 11 Jul., 11:53, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> > from the tone of your message, it seems to me, that I somehow must
> > have "stepped onto your toes" --- sorry, that was not at all my
> > intention! And I couldn't imagine that someone would be offended by me
> > signing my messages with my nickname
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Anyway, it takes a lot more to offend me. Not writing out your name is
> not something I really care about. I just didn't know what I should
> write in the "Hallo ...". And I think it makes a better community if
> people know eac
> from the tone of your message, it seems to me, that I somehow must
> have "stepped onto your toes" --- sorry, that was not at all my
> intention! And I couldn't imagine that someone would be offended by me
> signing my messages with my nickname --- sorry again. I'll use my real
> name from now o
Hi John,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:29 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> There's a typo in the script file (a missing quote, as you can see).
> I had that, and thought it had been fixed. You can edit that line
> yourself and try again -- but of course someone should patch the
> master copy.
Thank you
There's a typo in the script file (a missing quote, as you can see).
I had that, and thought it had been fixed. You can edit that line
yourself and try again -- but of course someone should patch the
master copy.
John
2009/7/11 Minh Nguyen :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm starting to learn how to use th
Hi folks,
I'm starting to learn how to use the merge script in Sage 4.1, but
encountered some syntax error. Here's a transcript of my session:
[mv...@sage sage-4.1]$ pwd
/scratch/mvngu/sage-4.1
[mv...@sage sage-4.1]$ ./sage -merge 5996
File "/scratch/mvngu/sage-4.1/local/bin/sage-apply-ticket"
Hi folks,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:30 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage-Release and Sage-Combinat-Devel,
>
> We're basically 100% done with sage-4.1, and Robert Miller will
> officially make the sage-4.1.tar tarball available. I've also built
> it on a lot of machines. However, I'm going t
Hi folks,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Recently, some people have reported that the download pages for Sage
> is confusing and has little information on how to select the
> appropriate distribution to download. See for example this thread in
> sage-devel:
>
Yep. I don't have time tomorrow, but I can be on IRC Sunday afternoon.
David
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> > >and source introspection for dynamic classes. Someone should
> > >review these (along with the rest of my changes)
> >
> > I will make this into
31 matches
Mail list logo
