[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:16 PM, gsw wrote: > just take a Sage source tree, and do "make && make". > > This will build all of the documentation *twice* in a row. > > So the "make" problem you reported is not restricted to binaries, and > I think this problem exists since the ReSTification of th

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi William, On 28 Jul., 05:01, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > I took the sage-4.1.1.alpha1 release build I had, then did "./sage > -bdist", took the result, extracted it, and did "make test". > >  1) It sits there and builds the documentation again, which takes a > *long* time.  It shouldn't do

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Meeting at MathFest

On Jul 27, 8:18 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > Is anyone else going?  It would be fun to get together with whoever. I'll be there since I'm giving a highly Sage-illustrated talk all about properties of the Hoffman-Singleton graph. sage: show(graphs.HoffmanSingletonGraph(), figsize=8) I'd enjoy joini

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi, builds fine on MacIntel (32bit) OS X 10.4, but there are four (long) doctest failures: -- The following tests failed: sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/misc/abstract_method.py" sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/mi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi folks, Upgraded OK from Sage 4.1 on 32-bit Ubuntu 9.04: [mv...@darkstar ~]$ uname -a Linux darkstar 2.6.28-13-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 19:49:51 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux [mv...@darkstar ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote: > Buiding Sage, doing "./sage -bdist", then extracting the result and > having "make test" 100% is a blocker for making the sage-4.1.1 > release. I've made this: >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6645 Also, building the docume

[sage-devel] Re: status of Solaris support in 4.1.1 release cycle

2009/7/28 Minh Nguyen : > > Hi folks, > > So far in the 4.1.1 release cycle, David Kirkby has added Solaris (on > the machine t2) build support for about 7 packages. That is very > impressive work for an individual porter. Thank you. > Out of curiosity, I compiled > Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 from source

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Meeting at MathFest

William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage-Devel, > > Is anybody going to MathFest? If so, write to Nathan Carter below. > I'm going, and I'm giving a talk about interacts. I'd love to talk sometime. Is anyone else going? It would be fun to get together with whoever. Thanks, Jason > -- William

[sage-devel] Re: empty lines in my worksheets

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:17 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: >> >> Hello: >> I just started to version-control my worksheets, and I noticed that >> some worksheets are changed, even if I don't open them. The change is >> inocous: empty lines are

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi, I took the sage-4.1.1.alpha1 release build I had, then did "./sage -bdist", took the result, extracted it, and did "make test". 1) It sits there and builds the documentation again, which takes a *long* time. It shouldn't do this for a binary. 2) Worse, every single test failed, with erro

[sage-devel] status of Solaris support in 4.1.1 release cycle

Hi folks, So far in the 4.1.1 release cycle, David Kirkby has added Solaris (on the machine t2) build support for about 7 packages. That is very impressive work for an individual porter. Out of curiosity, I compiled Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 from source on t2. Now the compilation dies at the point where

[sage-devel] Re: how to submit upgraded biopython spkg for python-2.6?

Hi Thomas, On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:30 AM, tkeller wrote: > > Sounds like a good plan. I downloaded your spkg and it installs fine > and works as expected. I have added this information to your ticket, > is there something else I should do for reviewing? If you haven't done so, you might want t

[sage-devel] Re: status of FreeBSD 64-bit support

If FBSD support is in the clouds couldn`t sage be compiled on linux (could be virtualized on FBSD) and then run on FBSD as a linux binary? Are there any problems when running as linux binary? FBSD 8.0 should have 2.6 kernel support ready... On Jul 27, 12:41 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi folks, > >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi, This regards sage-4.1.1.alpha1. On 32-bit OS X: -- The following tests failed: sage -t -long "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/birds_other.rst" sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/misc/abstract_method.py"

[sage-devel] Re: A purge on the gcc '-g' option is in order

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:22 PM, David Kirkby wrote: > > I noticed that several packages build Sage with the -g option to , > which adds debugging information. This has 3 downsides > > 1) The binaries are slower > 2) The binaries are bigger > 3) Possibly takes longer to compile - I've not verified

[sage-devel] A purge on the gcc '-g' option is in order

I noticed that several packages build Sage with the -g option to , which adds debugging information. This has 3 downsides 1) The binaries are slower 2) The binaries are bigger 3) Possibly takes longer to compile - I've not verified this, but I suspect it does. I think it would be a good idea to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

2009/7/27 Minh Nguyen : > > Hi folks, > > Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 is out for your bug squashing pleasure :-) > #6528: David Kirkby: PolyBoRi ignores CXX and passes Sun flags to GNU My mistake entirely, but Alexander Dreyer contributed to this patch too. I fixed the linker flags, and Alexander Dreyer th

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

I'm having trouble with 4ti installation. Maybe I'm just too impatient. Do you have an spkg for it? On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:02 PM, davidp wrote: > > Marshall and David: thanks very much for these suggestions. > > Dave > > On Jul 20, 4:59 am, David Joyner wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:3

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Categories restart

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > >        Hi David (K), > > How far are you with the review of the category patch? > > I am with Florent and Franco at RISC, and will give a hard blow of > doctest tomorrow. We would like to avoid doing things where you may > already have

[sage-devel] Re: Why the vector function changes the ring of a vector for ZZ when possible ?

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:11 PM, slabbe wrote: > > I am writing some functions where I want the user to specify the > arguments as tuples if they want. So, in the code, I am writing > something like : > > arg = map(vector, arg) > > Of course, I want my function to work also if arg is already a lis

Re: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Categories restart

Hi David (K), How far are you with the review of the category patch? I am with Florent and Franco at RISC, and will give a hard blow of doctest tomorrow. We would like to avoid doing things where you may already have done some. Thanks for your quick reply! Cheers,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

On Jul 27, 1:18 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Jul 27, 3:59 am, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > The following tests failed on sage.math: > > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/abstract_method.py > > Here's a patch for these t

[sage-devel] Why the vector function changes the ring of a vector for ZZ when possible ?

I am writing some functions where I want the user to specify the arguments as tuples if they want. So, in the code, I am writing something like : arg = map(vector, arg) Of course, I want my function to work also if arg is already a list of vectors, but I ran into the following problem : {{{ sag

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Build from upgrade works flawlessly, and all doctests pass, on 64-bit (Opteron) Fedora 10. Kiran --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegrou

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

On Jul 27, 3:59 am, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi folks, > > The following tests failed on sage.math: > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/abstract_method.py Here's a patch for these two failures:

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Meeting at MathFest

I'm not, but I've met him socially, so I'll contact him to see if he wants to meet on this coast instead. Kiran On Jul 27, 1:27 pm, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage-Devel, > > Is anybody going to MathFest? If so, write to Nathan Carter below. > > -- William > > -- Forwarded message

[sage-devel] Re: how to submit upgraded biopython spkg for python-2.6?

Sounds like a good plan. I downloaded your spkg and it installs fine and works as expected. I have added this information to your ticket, is there something else I should do for reviewing? Do you know what the proposed differences between the beta and 1.51 final are? Thomas On Jul 27, 12:30 am,

[sage-devel] Fwd: Meeting at MathFest

Hi Sage-Devel, Is anybody going to MathFest? If so, write to Nathan Carter below. -- William -- Forwarded message -- From: Nathan Carter Date: Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM Subject: Meeting at MathFest To: wst...@gmail.com Dear William, I got your email address from the S

[sage-devel] Dan Bernstein's primegen (was: Re: should/is the file "deps" under revision control?)

[I'm turning this into a new thread. It concerns integrating Dan Bernstein's 'primegen' library into sage, and is ticket #3925.] On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:56:44AM +0100, John Cremona wrote: > As wjp says on the ticket, to try it out you only need to install the > new spkg and the second patch.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Minh Nguyen wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 is out for your bug squashing pleasure :-) Source >> and binary are available at > > > [snip] > > > >> >> With this release, Sage is now in feature-freeze mode. From now until >> the rel

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 is out for your bug squashing pleasure :-) Source > and binary are available at [snip] > > With this release, Sage is now in feature-freeze mode. From now until > the release of 4.1.1, only bug fixes would be merged. The following > ticke

[sage-devel] Re: empty lines in my worksheets

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > >  Hello: >  I just started to version-control my worksheets, and I noticed that > some worksheets are changed, even if I don't open them. The change is > inocous: empty lines are added to the files worksheet.txt between the > code and the out

[sage-devel] Re: slideshow mode for the notebook

William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> Marshall Hampton wrote: >> >>> I guess I just like to do it the other way around, with a screencast >>> primarily and a notebook for interactive questions. Often, after an >>> intro sage talk someone will ask, "Can S

[sage-devel] Re: slideshow mode for the notebook

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Marshall Hampton wrote: > >> I guess I just like to do it the other way around, with a screencast >> primarily and a notebook for interactive questions.  Often, after an >> intro sage talk someone will ask, "Can Sage do X" and I can show them

[sage-devel] Re: Strange timeit output while using maxima interface

Thanks Minh and Simon! On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Simon King wrote: >> - >> sage: f(x) = function('f',x); >> sage: timeit('bool( f(x) == 0 )') >> 5 loops, best of 3: 71.6 ms per loop >> sage: timeit('bool( f(x) == 0 )') >> 5 loops, best of 3: 89.1 ms per loop > > Finally someone com

[sage-devel] Re: slideshow mode for the notebook

Marshall Hampton wrote: > I guess I just like to do it the other way around, with a screencast > primarily and a notebook for interactive questions. Often, after an > intro sage talk someone will ask, "Can Sage do X" and I can show them > on the notebook. But I like the screencasts for more tha

[sage-devel] Re: Generation of discrete random variables

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Carlo Hamalainen wrote: > > Hi, > > Does Sage have anything for generating discrete random variables > according to some user-defined distribution? DiscreteRandomVariable > doesn't seem to actually generate things. Or am I missing something > really obvious? > > I'

[sage-devel] Re: slideshow mode for the notebook

On 07/26/09 05:59, William Stein wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screencasting_software#Mac_OS_X > > It's depressing -- there appear to be *no* FOSS screencasting programs > for OS X at all. This one works on OS X: http://www.unixuser.org/~euske/vnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.html prabhu -

[sage-devel] Generation of discrete random variables

Hi, Does Sage have anything for generating discrete random variables according to some user-defined distribution? DiscreteRandomVariable doesn't seem to actually generate things. Or am I missing something really obvious? I'm wondering if there is a Python-accessible implementation of the code he

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The following tests failed on sage.math: > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py > ** > File > "/scratch/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.alpha1/devel

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi folks, The following tests failed on sage.math: sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py ** File "/scratch/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.alpha1/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py", line 469: sage: lines E

[sage-devel] status of FreeBSD 64-bit support

Hi folks, As of Sage 4.1.1.alpha1, the compilation of Sage now dies when it comes to compiling MPIR. The full log is up at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/install-freebsd64.log Here's a relevant snippet from my attempt: /usr/local/bin/bash ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/in

[sage-devel] empty lines in my worksheets

Hello: I just started to version-control my worksheets, and I noticed that some worksheets are changed, even if I don't open them. The change is inocous: empty lines are added to the files worksheet.txt between the code and the output in some code cells (apparently, all code cells with non-emp

[sage-devel] Re: Circuits

2009/7/27 Peter Jeremy : > On 2009-Jul-26 11:07:49 -0700, William Stein wrote: >>Hi Sage-Devel (in particular, people who know about electrical circuits), > > I'm not an EE but electronics is a hobby of mine. > >>I just happen to be meeting with an undergrad tomorrow at Univ. of >>Washington abou

[sage-devel] Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 released

Hi folks, Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 is out for your bug squashing pleasure :-) Source and binary are available at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.alpha1.tar http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.alpha1-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz Th

[sage-devel] Re: Strange timeit output while using maxima interface

Dear Golam, dear All, On 27 Jul., 04:01, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: > Hi, > > While doing some symbolic computations that require > Maxima interface, "timeit" reports progressively > longer duration for the same computation. > > - > sage: f(x) = function('f',x); > sage: timeit('bool( f

[sage-devel] Re: Circuits

On 2009-Jul-26 11:07:49 -0700, William Stein wrote: >Hi Sage-Devel (in particular, people who know about electrical circuits), I'm not an EE but electronics is a hobby of mine. >I just happen to be meeting with an undergrad tomorrow at Univ. of >Washington about him possibly working with me, and