On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Alex Clemesha wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
>> bugs fixed (after separating it off from sage as a separate program
>> and rewriting the expec
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
> bugs fixed (after separating it off from sage as a separate program
> and rewriting the expect stuff). But I realized that it would be a
> total nightmare to
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:35 PM, gsw wrote:
>
> What I currently miss is the possibility to cross-compile Sage.
>
> I heartily would like to build the MacPPC Sage version on my MacIntel.
> The OS infrastructure is well prepared for this, any Xcode brings
> everything with it to do that. But I do
Hi,
This is the current picture regarding upcoming Sage Days:
This one is funded by the Clay Math Institute and some invites have gone out:
* [[dayscambridge2|Sage Days 18]] -- Cambridge, MA (December 1-5,
2009); theme: BSD (Number theory)
This one is likely to be funded by the NSA:
* (tenta
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
>>> bugs fixed (after separatin
What I currently miss is the possibility to cross-compile Sage.
I heartily would like to build the MacPPC Sage version on my MacIntel.
The OS infrastructure is well prepared for this, any Xcode brings
everything with it to do that. But I don't know whether (or how) I
could tell Python/Cython to c
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
>> bugs fixed (after separating it off from sage as a separate program
>> and rewriting the expec
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
> bugs fixed (after separating it off from sage as a separate program
> and rewriting the expect stuff). But I realized that it would be a
> total nightmare to
Hi,
Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
bugs fixed (after separating it off from sage as a separate program
and rewriting the expect stuff). But I realized that it would be a
total nightmare to introduce yet another sobj ("sage object") storage
format, which woul
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> However,
>> there are plenty of ones that we don't have a fix for -- see #7095. I
>> think there are a couple threads on sage-devel about this.
>
>
> Should we be holding up 4.1.2 for issues that (according to what you
On Monday 12 October 2009, Kwankyu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a patch to remove the redundant minus sign in the last output
> in the following:
>
> sage: from sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_ring import
> MPolynomialRing_polydict
> sage: R.=MPolynomialRing_polydict(GF(2),2,order='lex')
> sa
Thanks. I forgot the Tests section.
Kwankyu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at htt
Hi Kwankyu,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Kwankyu wrote:
> Do I need to put a doctest anyway?
Yes. Put the doctest under a section called "TESTS:" and make sure to
reference the relevant ticket number. Doctests under the section
"TESTS:" are meant to demonstrate that a bug has been fixed.
Hi,
I wrote a patch to remove the redundant minus sign in the last output
in the following:
sage: from sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_ring import
MPolynomialRing_polydict
sage: R.=MPolynomialRing_polydict(GF(2),2,order='lex')
sage: R
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over Finite Field
I have made a screencast tutorial on creating a new ticket on trac.
See my blog post on wordpress.com [1]. This video tutorial was
inspired by the "Tech Tip Videos" of Linux Journal [2]. The idea is
that, when things are easier to show by a screencast, then show it
using a screencast instead of us
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
>>> Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
>>> (www.busybox.net) into sage?
>>
>> I do not believe so.
>
> [snip]
>
>> Sage is
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
>> Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
>> (www.busybox.net) into sage?
>
> I do not believe so.
[snip]
> Sage is designed to run on workstations and servers, not small embedded
> systems.
Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
> (www.busybox.net) into sage?
I do not believe so.
> Busybox includes a shell (ash, I think),
> and most shellutils and textutils one would probably want to use (this
> includes awk, sed, etc). Instead of try
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:34 AM, MaxTheMouse wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I believe there will be an ECL release any day now. One was made
>> earlier this week I believe, but it had a serious problem. I've no
>> idea if any hard-coded paths were found and fixed in the last release.
>>
>> dave
>
> I did a qui
Hi all,
This is mostly some random brainstorming. MPFR (which Sage uses for
arbitrary-precision real and complex numbers) is an excellent library,
but it's far from optimal in some respects.
For one thing, the interface (correct rounding assuming exact inputs)
is coarse for doing computations wit
I'd be happy to, although I will have a pro-positive review bias.
-Marshall
On Oct 11, 4:50 am, MaxTheMouse wrote:
> I have put up a new package
> athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/awebb/biopython-1.52.p0.spkg
> if someone would like to review it.
>
> Adam
--~--~-~--~~
Would it make more sense to include something like busybox
(www.busybox.net) into sage? Busybox includes a shell (ash, I think),
and most shellutils and textutils one would probably want to use (this
includes awk, sed, etc). Instead of trying to fix the sage shell
scripts to work in any combinati
On 11 říj, 15:50, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Does this work for you?
Yes, thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Burcin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr..
Hi Robert,
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
"ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Hello all, is there in Sage a function which tests, if expression1
> depends on expression2 ?
> Something like Maxima's command freeof?
Symbolic expressions have methods named find, match, has.
> sage: x=var(
yes, done!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-d
As Ming noted, I have tested a patch under AIX compliments of
http://www.metamodul.com/
Could an acknowledgment of that be placed on the Sage web site.
Something like
"http://www.metamodul.com/ for access to hardware running AIX"
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Learn more from my ticket at
>>
>> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7188
>
> I was attracted by the following comment of yours:
>
> {{{
> I've tested this on
>
> * AIX 6.1, compli
Hello all, is there in Sage a function which tests, if expression1
depends on expression2 ?
Something like Maxima's command freeof?
I searched Sage sources against 'freeof 'and found nothing relevant.
If not, I think that it will be usefull to add the following function
into Sage, but I have no
Hi David,
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Learn more from my ticket at
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7188
I was attracted by the following comment of yours:
{{{
I've tested this on
* AIX 6.1, compliments of http://www.metamodul.com/10.html
}}}
Th
I thought all you mathematicians could not resist looking at this.
I know it sounds crazy, but it actually forms the basis of a portable
method of getting the number of seconds since 1/1/1970 on Unix.
Learn more from my ticket at
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7188
which needs review!
>
> I believe there will be an ECL release any day now. One was made
> earlier this week I believe, but it had a serious problem. I've no
> idea if any hard-coded paths were found and fixed in the last release.
>
> dave
I did a quick build and check with ecl-10.0.2 and the hard-coded paths
are s
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:38, William Stein wrote:
> That's it. It worked first try, and solves the problem.
I'm not a twisted expert, but i know a lot about threads and sub
processes. The basic problem is, that the user calls something
synchronized when he/she requests a zip, but behind the s
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> >
>
>
>
> The Sage Notebook is a Twisted application, and Twisted's "deferreds"
> might seem like a good idea for solving the above problem. However,
> they are actually *not*
Hi,
There have been a couple of requests on sage-support in regards to
Gnuplot.py. The current package was broken in the upgrade to Python
2.6. The new version Gnuplot.py 1.8 works with Python 2.6 and has some
updates with respect to Numpy. This is now Trac #7187 and there is a
new package at htt
I have put up a new package at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/awebb/biopython-1.52.p0.spkg
if someone would like to review it.
Adam
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:12 AM, ghtdak wrote:
>
>> On Jul 21, 6:40 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> wrote:
>>> ghtdak wrote:
>>>
This thread has gotten long and there are many subjects embedded
within.
>>>
One of the problems I've
36 matches
Mail list logo
