> [1]http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/win/meta/sage-vmware-4.4.alpha0.zip.me...
> [2]http://aria2.sourceforge.net/
>
> I'm not aware of a better solution to handle this problem ...
>
> H
Harald:
I think metalinks are great, indeed, the metalink file you reference
contains a torrent file reference
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Simon King wrote:
> I agree that this "error opening source code" sucks. The attitude to
> hide the code (and even the documentation, in some cases!) behind
> layers of abstraction seems a side-effect of the new category
> framework (perhaps not in this particular
Hi guys and gals,
I'm having some difficulty installing gstat, automap and sp into the
sage R environment.
I keep getting an error saying that the "sage R include directory is
empty"
Is there a way I can fix this?
Joal Heagney
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c
On 31 Jul., 23:32, Simon King wrote:
> > Does anyone with a bit more understanding of
> > python then me know what is going on in sage.rings.real_lazy and most
> > importand, is it possible to make the mechanism by which LazyWrapper
> > adds the sqrt function overwrite an already existing sqrt() f
Hi koffie,
On 31 Jul., 16:57, koffie wrote:
> ... What goes wrong is
> that they add functions to a class in sage.rings.real_lazy in a way
> that I don't understand and in a way that seems not very compatible
> with good object oriented coding conventions.
I had a brief look at the code, and it
Hej All,
I was doing some work on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9094.
In trying to do it the nice way (i.e. avoiding unnessery double code
by putting the code in a common base class) I ran into trouble. The
core of all problems seems to be with real_lazy. What goes wrong is
that they a
I was just about to install gcc 4.5.0 on 't2' when I noticed that
4.5.1 has just been released today. I had to get it from the GNU site
directly, as the mirrors did not have it.
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2
for anyone that wants it. Given this is a maintenance release, wi
Hi!
I got some answer from the Singular team.
> So, they do not claim that slimgb works over the integers.
Indeed, slimgb apparently is designed for coefficients that form a
field. Therefore, calling slimgb on an integer example will, in
future, result in an error message.
To wrap it up:
I.g
On Jul 30, 2:22 pm, Niles wrote:
> On Jul 30, 7:36 am, mario wrote:
>
> > I have not tried using other rings; can you give me an example to try?
>
> Sure! The patch works over any commutative ring that sage supports;
> here are a couple:
>
> sage: M. = MPowerSeriesRing(GF(11),4); M
> Multivari
On 07/30/2010 01:54 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
> So we're currently working on a long-overdue release of Cython with
> all kinds of snazzy new features. However, our automated testing
> system seems to keep turning up sporadic segfaults when running the
> sage doctest suite. This is obviously bad, but
On 07/31/2010 12:53 AM, Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> On Jul 29, 9:12 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>> I will point out, though, that you clearly *do* use Maxima, since you
>> tried to do this in Sage, which uses Maxima heavily.
>
> This may be, but I dont know about it.
> I know that Sage uses Maxima, but nei
11 matches
Mail list logo
