On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Clarification: Sage's plot code does not interact with the GPL
incompatible graphviz library in any way.
?.. So we have a graphviz spkg and absolutely no interface between the two ?
O_o
I'm sorry, that's not what
So, I haven't looked at profiling for p-adics for quite a while. But one
way to speed up this kind of item creation is to implement a morphism from
ZZ to Qp and then write a super-fast _call_ method. I can't do it right
now, but I can provide advice if someone else wants to.
David
On Fri, Aug
Another option would have been installing from the Ubuntu Minimal CD,
that way you could install only the strictly necessary packages.
Indeed, if the Sage notebook can be accessed from outside the virtual
machine, you could even get rid of the X environment, and have sage -
notebook running on a
I'm thinking of making an optional package for the program Qhull,
which computes convex hulls and Delaunay triangulations numerically in
any dimension. I am more motivated to work on it if it could someday
become a standard package, so my question is whether its license is
compatible with Sage.
I have nothing to say about the license questions, but I did put
together a spkg for TOPCOM and some sage code to interface it at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8169. Since both Qhull and
TOPCOM deal with aspects of triangulations of the convex hull of a
point set it would be nice to
That makes sense; I just tried your spkg and ran into some problems
which I put on the ticket.
I'd like to make it easy to use alternative convex hull programs for
polyhedrons (qhull and lrs being the first examples).
On Aug 14, 10:06 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I have nothing
I suspect that many of these issues would be resolved by using Maxima
directly, using
one of the graphical interfaces (e.g. wxmaxima).
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
I closed #5065 as the problem has been fixed via the new Abelian
Groups support. I only meant to mark it as fixed, sorry -- I know
that I am not allowed to close tickets! If someone who is allowed can
check up on me, thanks.
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On 12 Ago, 09:49, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/10 2:36 PM, Maurizio wrote:
I have a quick question that is related to engineering support (I was
reading the document you posted on the wiki about sd24, and I see the
roadmap is planning to address those issues
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:16 PM, ancienthart joalheag...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Would people be interested in this image? If so, where would I upload
it to?
Can you upload it to any website you have access to and let others
test it?
Joal Heagney
--
To post to this group, send an email
On 8/14/10 10:46 AM, Maurizio wrote:
On 12 Ago, 09:49, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/10 2:36 PM, Maurizio wrote:
I have a quick question that is related to engineering support (I was
reading the document you posted on the wiki about sd24, and I see the
roadmap
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 8/14/10 10:46 AM, Maurizio wrote:
On 12 Ago, 09:49, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/10 2:36 PM, Maurizio wrote:
I have a quick question that is related to engineering support (I
On Jul 23, 9:36 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/23/10 11:35 AM, VictorMiller wrote:
There's abugin assigning 1 x 1 submatrices. assigning any
submatrices with dimensions bigger than 1 seems to work as expected:
sage: A =matrix(GF(2),100,100)
sage: C1
On 8/14/10 12:17 PM, William Stein wrote:
On the other hand, I would definitely expect that points([1,2,3]) should
give what you are saying (points (1,1), (2,2), (3,3)).
I don't agree. Points([1,2,3]) should either give an error or work as
it does now (draws a point in 3d). I would be fine
*hooray*!!!
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed #5065 as the problem has been fixed via the new Abelian
Groups support. I only meant to mark it as fixed, sorry -- I know
that I am not allowed to close tickets! If someone who is allowed can
On 12 ago, 11:38, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Well, there is a general trend towards using functions instead of
attributes in Sage. I think the main reason is for documentation (I
wish python had attribute docstrings that we could query!).
They wouldn't be attributes
On Saturday, August 14, 2010, cousteau cousteaulecommand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 ago, 11:38, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Well, there is a general trend towards using functions instead of
attributes in Sage. I think the main reason is for documentation (I
wish python had
17 matches
Mail list logo
