On 2010-Nov-20 19:09:00 -0800, John H Palmieri wrote:
>Is that the compiler flag "-m64" has no effect on other systems? Some
>spkg-install files just check whether SAGE64 is set, not the platform,
>and then they add -m64 to the flags. So if that does anything on
>linux, then SAGE64 can be used o
Hi Dima!
On 22 Nov., 06:09, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Are we talking about the same kernels?
> The kernel de-commit described in the post was done in 2009,
> and it's not clear to me whether this has made it into
> production kernels already.
> (almost certainly not into Debian stable...)
Sorry, q
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> Ah, the culprit was the preparser. Thank you; disregard my previous
> comments.
No problem. I bet somebody else will find this message in the
archives later or via a search, and it will help them out.
Also, your example is a good handy example to
Are we talking about the same kernels?
The kernel de-commit described in the post was done in 2009,
and it's not clear to me whether this has made it into
production kernels already.
(almost certainly not into Debian stable...)
Dima
On Nov 22, 3:20 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> At ticket #
Ah, the culprit was the preparser. Thank you; disregard my previous
comments.
On Nov 21, 6:50 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> > It is actually slower, not just feels like it. Here is a specific
> > example:
>
> > On Sage Notebook (locally):
>
> > "fro
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> It is actually slower, not just feels like it. Here is a specific
> example:
>
> On Sage Notebook (locally):
>
> "from numpy import zeros
> from random import randint
>
> def cellular(rule, N, initial='Single-cell'):
> '''Yields a matrix showing
It is actually slower, not just feels like it. Here is a specific
example:
On Sage Notebook (locally):
"from numpy import zeros
from random import randint
def cellular(rule, N, initial='Single-cell'):
'''Yields a matrix showing the evolution of a Wolfram's cellular
automaton
rule: d
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:25 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Eviatar wrote:
>> I don't know if this is related, but I've noticed even the local Sage
>> Notebook is slower than command-line, specifically NumPy operations.
>
> It makes absolutely no sense that that could
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> I don't know if this is related, but I've noticed even the local Sage
> Notebook is slower than command-line, specifically NumPy operations.
It makes absolutely no sense that that could happen.Please give a
specific example.
-- William
>
>
Hi all!
At ticket #10294, Mike Hansen gave a very helpful remark. He pointed
to a thread at
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/5a2b00e35b0864a7
Our system administrator already answered to me that the solution
suggested in this thread (or in another thread that is l
I don't know if this is related, but I've noticed even the local Sage
Notebook is slower than command-line, specifically NumPy operations.
On Nov 21, 12:30 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:23 AM, tuxiano wrote:
> > Please, don't disablewww.sagenb.org
> > I'm not an administra
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:23 AM, tuxiano wrote:
> Please, don't disable www.sagenb.org
> I'm not an administrator of my office PC so I can't install SAGE and
> my company filters connections not on port 80 or 8080 so www.sagenb.org
> is the only Sage implementation that I can use.
There is also
Hi,
I wrote a patch for the ODE solver some time ago which wasn't accepted
yet. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8981
As I wanted to bring it up to date and maybe improve the documentation a
bit I (again) came across the problem, that the last example of the
module http://www.sagema
On 2010-11-21 18:57, André-Patrick Bubel wrote:
> Is there a way to automatically test the code anyway using this cython
> function?
I'm afraid this is not possible for the moment.
What is possible, is to write the code you want to test as a function in
a .pyx file and then test that function. S
I'm not an expert of the matter, but I'm the user who made the comment
and I'd like to add that I don't have problems with sites that use
port 8080 while I can't connect to sites that use port 8000, for
example I can't connect to
http://t2nb.math.washington.edu:8000/
So I think that switching fro
Update:
Since my last update;
The Atlas problem seemed to have been fixed with the atlas-3.8.3.p17
spkg, however I ran into more trouble later with matplotlib-1.0.0
and that sent me off on a course of enquiry that led me to try
building
each component separately; BLAS, NUMPY, PYTHON, ATLAS, etc.
A
On 2010-11-21 15:18, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> A comment from a user recently that he can only use port 80 and 8080 by
> his employer, makes me think we should change the default port.
I would just like to point out that this is irrelevant, because the port
under discussion is the one used by runni
24618 1290349603.215559 write(3, "aaa", 3) = 3
24619 1290349603.219923 <... read resumed> "aaa", 256) = 3
in the first case:
Wall time: 16.0200681686
Total CPU: 0.862045
in the second one:
Wall time: 0.0230610370636
Total CPU: 0.042001
in the third one:
Wall time: 8.00897812843
Total CPU: 0.300
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sagenb/notebook/notebook_object.html
says the default port is 8000.
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sagenb/notebook/notebook_object.html
says of port 8000
"8000 TCP UDP iRDMI (Intel Remote Desktop Management Interface)[44]—sometimes
erroneously u
On Nov 21, 6:22 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 11/20/10 3:35 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > On 11/20/10 3:26 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> This doesn't seem to work:
>
> >> load('https://somefile')
>
> >> Seehttp://alpha.sagenb.org/home/jason3/43/publish/for an example and
> >> the errors.
>
> > Er, *h
Please, don't disable www.sagenb.org
I'm not an administrator of my office PC so I can't install SAGE and
my company filters connections not on port 80 or 8080 so www.sagenb.org
is the only Sage implementation that I can use. Perhaps other people
are in my condition.
Thanks
Tiziano
On Nov 21, 3
On 20 November 2010 22:52, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> For each of the commands mentioned in the subject I would like to have a
> one-line command just to check that the command works. So if you know
> any of these commands, please give me a one-liner.
>
> I am writing a patch at #10300 to check that
j...@selmer%echo "2+2;" | sage -kash -b
kash% 4
Time: 0.000169 s
(-b suppresses the banner. I could give a less trivial example if needed!)
John
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> for GAP:
>
> $ echo "Size(SymmetricGroup(5));" | sage -gap -q
> 120
>
> hope this helps,
>
On Nov 20, 3:07 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I think somebody should seriously look intowww.sagenb.org. It is so
> slow that it is essentially unusable. Unfortunately, it is also very
> bad advertising for Sage, because for many people their first contact
> with Sage might bewww.sagenb.org. I've
j...@selmer%echo "2+2;" | sage -singular -q
4
John
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:51 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> j...@selmer%echo "2+2;" | sage -kash -b
>
> kash% 4
> Time: 0.000169 s
>
> (-b suppresses the banner. I could give a less trivial example if needed!)
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1
for GAP:
$ echo "Size(SymmetricGroup(5));" | sage -gap -q
120
hope this helps,
Dima
On Nov 21, 6:52 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> For each of the commands mentioned in the subject I would like to have a
> one-line command just to check that the command works. So if you know
> any of these comman
On 2010-11-21 00:42, John Cremona wrote:
> do you mean, for example,
>
> j...@selmer%echo "0 0 1 -7 6 0 0 0 0 0 " | sage -mwrank -v 0 -q -o
> Curve [0,0,1,-7,6] : Rank = 3
> [[3],[[1,-1],[-2,3],[-7/4,25/8]]]
Precisely, thanks John!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegro
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:51 PM, rjf wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 20, 4:49 pm, kstueve wrote:
>
>>
>> One of the reasons making the fastest possible pi(x) available is
>> important is because of its relationship to the Riemann hypothesis. A
>> proof of the Riemann hypothesis would not only provide immens
28 matches
Mail list logo
