On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:26:19PM -0700, Simon King wrote:
> I am nearly done with a full Cython-version of cached_method. That's
> to say:
Nice!
> 1) cdef classes inheriting from Parent or Element can be provided with
> cached methods, even if they do not allow attribute assignment.
> 2) Due to
On 5 April 2011 05:27, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
>> Is the problem reproducible?
>>
>> If so, a valgrind log would be useful to debug the problem. It should
>> find the source of any segfault. zn_poly would need to be compiled
>> with the -g option to
Dear all, dear Dan Drake, dear Pablo,
Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code
allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the
notebook [1]. As a side effect, it:
* allows for uploading a .txt file from a URL (was broken)
* allows fo
It is testing exceptionally simple code, with exceptionally simple
tests.
I doubt this is a bug in zn_poly.
If it turns out to not be reproducible, I would ignore it. It's much
more likely a cosmic ray or transient hardware fault or bug in the OS.
But let's see if it can be reproduced.
Bill.
O
Ah, it seems that you do not actually want expert mathematicians who
are not expert coders to contribute code to Sage.
Perhaps this could be documented somewhere.
On Apr 2, 4:18 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 2 April 2011 14:20, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > Please also bear in mind that many "upstream"
I think that part of the issue here is the difference between the
algorithms/coding them, and all the hoo-ha you have to do to get a
computer to do that fast in compiled languages, headers and whatnot.
I realize those things are important, but they are almost certainly
the last thing that a classic
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 07:16:16PM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
> > It sounds like it might be less work for you if we switch to "email
> > Minh for an account"?
>
> Or how about setting up something which copies the mail to those with
> admin rights on trac, so it does not rely on any one individua
One possibly data point is that GCC 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP and MPIR on
x86_64 and as far as I know cannot and will not be worked around.
There were also bugs in GCC 4.3.3 which miscompiled FLINT, but as far
as I know that issue never affected Sage.
On Apr 3, 8:17 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> T
For the record, the last release of the 4.3 series is gcc-4.3.5.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sa
On Tuesday, April 5, 2011 8:13:17 AM UTC-4, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Ah, it seems that you do not actually want expert mathematicians who
> are not expert coders to contribute code to Sage.
>
You are missing the point of this thread; its not at all about Mike R
tripping over one of the numerous C++
On 04/ 5/11 03:06 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
One possibly data point is that GCC 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP and MPIR on
x86_64 and as far as I know cannot and will not be worked around.
Thank you for that. I'm not going to address the issue now, but if that is the
case, we should check for gcc 4.3.2 and
Hi Nicolas,
On 5 Apr., 12:27, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> > That's odd, since "import sage.structure.dynamic_class" works fine in
> > a sage session.
>
> > Do you have an idea what went wrong?
>
> Hmm, that sounds like an import loop somewhere between dynamic_class
> and cached_method.
You are
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 5, 2011 8:13:17 AM UTC-4, Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Ah, it seems that you do not actually want expert mathematicians who
>> are not expert coders to contribute code to Sage.
>
> You are missing the point of this thread; its not a
FYI:
Hi,
I've tagged RELEASE-5_24-BRANCH in CVS and built tar.gz
and rpms and posted them to the SF file manager:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/maxima/files
As always, give it a try, and it would be great if someone
can build and upload a Windows installer.
A couple of issues related to r
I decided to build and test zn_poly a few times, to try to see how reproducible
the other issue I reported was. So far, I've not managed to reproduce that
problem, but I have hit a new one.
I've not been running the code for that long, but have attempted to build
zn_poly 508 times as I write.
On Apr 5, 2011, at 13:44 , Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I decided to build and test zn_poly a few times, to try to see how
> reproducible the other issue I reported was. So far, I've not managed to
> reproduce that problem, but I have hit a new one.
>
> I've not been running the code for that lon
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and chromium 10 with sun's java.
>
> I pulled Jason's changes into my repo, so every one who pulled from me
> can do just hg pull; hg up. Fin
On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:31 , William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
>> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
>> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and chromium 10 with sun's java.
>>
>> I pulled Jason's changes into my repo, so every
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:31 , William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
>>> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
>>> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and chromium 10 with su
On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:40 , William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:31 , William Stein wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:40 , William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:31 , William Stein wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
> Great job J
2011/4/5 William Stein :
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
>> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
>> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and chromium 10 with sun's java.
>>
>> I pulled Jason's changes into my repo, so every one who pulled from me
>>
In XCode 4.0.1, the default C compiler (cc) is
gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.9)
(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine)
whereas it also has gcc:
gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)
I wonder what should be the default C compi
On 4/5/11 6:40 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:31 , William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
works here on ubuntu and firef
> In XCode 4.0.1, the default C compiler (cc) is
> gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.9)
> (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine)
>
> whereas it also has gcc:
> gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)
>
> I wonder what should be the
Dear Jeroen, dear Jason, dear all,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:47:41PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code
> allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the
> notebook #10652. As a side effect, it:
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
