> > Please seehttp://wiki.sagemath.org/jmms2012, and in
> > particularhttp://wiki.sagemath.org/jmms2012#boothsignupforsome of the
> > details
> > and signup. We'll be across for the booth for WeBWorK, if my
> > information is correct. Having people for the grand opening and the
> > lunchtime
On Jan 5, 9:59 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 09:28 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Please, add anything I've left out. Checklists won't make a review good,
> >> but they can prevent it from being too bad.
>
> > Hmm, maybe this should be added to the developer guide? How much of
> >
On 01/05/2012 09:28 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Please, add anything I've left out. Checklists won't make a review good,
but they can prevent it from being too bad.
Hmm, maybe this should be added to the developer guide? How much of
your checklist is in the 'reviewing patches' section, and how much
c
On Jan 5, 8:01 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I was compiling this for myself and remembered the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/ReviewChecklist
>
> Please, add anything I've left out. Checklists won't make a review good,
> but they can prevent it from being too bad.
Hmm, maybe this should
And finally, 'make ptestlong' gives:
make ptestlong
...
--
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1307.0 seconds
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
I was compiling this for myself and remembered the wiki:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/ReviewChecklist
Please, add anything I've left out. Checklists won't make a review good,
but they can prevent it from being too bad.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
On Jan 5, 3:03 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:21:37 PM UTC-8, john.hoebing wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > > Will this procedure work? Surely ./sage -i will not work with a
> > > half-built system? Well, I am trying...
>
> > No that won't
On Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:21:37 PM UTC-8, john.hoebing wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona wrote:
> >
> > Will this procedure work? Surely ./sage -i will not work with a
> > half-built system? Well, I am trying...
>
> No that won't work, as some others have already found.
It
On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Will this procedure work? Surely ./sage -i will not work with a
> half-built system? Well, I am trying...
No that won't work, as some others have already found. In
the early days of testing new r spkgs we had to go back
and rebuild from scratch, doing
I also get this on Sage 4.7.2
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.o
On 5 January 2012 18:54, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> For those running Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot):
>>
>> Please test sage-4.8.alpha6:
>> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.8.alpha6/sage-4.8.alpha6.tar
>>
>> In s
It seems ATLAS is failing again:
IN STAGE 1 INSTALL: SYSTEM PROBE/AUX COMPILE
make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/eviatar/Desktop/sage-4.8.alpha6/spkg/build/atlas-3.8.4/ATLAS-build'
make[2]: *** [build] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/eviatar/Desktop/sage-
Hi Jeroen,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> For those running Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot):
>
> Please test sage-4.8.alpha6:
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.8.alpha6/sage-4.8.alpha6.tar
>
> In some cases, R is known to fail to build because of a read
On 5 January 2012 14:35, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> For those running Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot):
>
> Please test sage-4.8.alpha6:
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.8.alpha6/sage-4.8.alpha6.tar
>
> In some cases, R is known to fail to build because of a readline issue.
> If y
For those running Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot):
Please test sage-4.8.alpha6:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.8.alpha6/sage-4.8.alpha6.tar
In some cases, R is known to fail to build because of a readline issue.
If you encounter this issue, please do the following (from ticke
Hello sage-devel,
*Blocker ticket* #12248 needs review. It fixes an issue with upgrading
introduced by #12016 (fix parallel make): essentially, a new
spkg/install doesn't work well with an old local/bin/sage-spkg.
Could somebody with some knowledge of the Sage build process please
review this ti
On Jan 4, 4:23 am, cch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a test sage-5.0.prealpha0 image for Intel x64 system. It owns
> the following functions:
>
> a) Sage-5-prealaph0
> b) Imagemagick-6.7.2
> c) matplotlib-gui enabled (with _tkagg backend)
> e) ffmpeg-0.8.4
> f) firefox nightly build 12a1
> g) jre-1.6
17 matches
Mail list logo
