Re: [sage-devel] Possible sage days on function fields

2012-02-22 Thread David Roe
> > 1. Are you willing to participate in such a sage days? > > 1. a) If yes, are there dates around the end of this year which are very > > inconvenient for you? > > I would be willing to participate in this. For me a date before mid-October > would be great, because our lecture period will start a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove newline from matrix([...]).eigenvectors_right()

2012-02-22 Thread P Purkayastha
On 02/23/2012 02:48 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: P Purkayastha writes: 1. [ ] Stop passing the keyword cr=True (i.e. make the other fields output as in RDF/CDF) 2. [ ] Stop passing the keyword cr=True but only when called from eigenvectors_right() 3. [ ] Keep the current output format (i.e. don't tou

[sage-devel] Re: Remove newline from matrix([...]).eigenvectors_right()

2012-02-22 Thread Keshav Kini
P Purkayastha writes: > 1. [ ] Stop passing the keyword cr=True (i.e. make the other fields output as > in RDF/CDF) > 2. [ ] Stop passing the keyword cr=True but only when called from > eigenvectors_right() > 3. [ ] Keep the current output format (i.e. don't touch any of this code) > 4. [ ] Keep t

[sage-devel] Remove newline from matrix([...]).eigenvectors_right()

2012-02-22 Thread P Purkayastha
Hi, At present the code for printing the eigenvectors of a matrix gives output in different "formats" depending on the field used. For RDF/CDF, the output appears an a single line. sage: matrix(CDF, [ [2, 1], [1, 2]]).eigenvectors_right() [(3.0, [(0.707106781187, 0.707106781187)], 1), (1.0, [

[sage-devel] Sage single Cell Server feedback

2012-02-22 Thread Ondřej Čertík
Hi, I just noticed (when testing a link to sagemath.org from my webpage) the single Cell Server: http://sagemath.org/eval.html so I played with it a little bit and I think this is really cool. Here is some feedback: * There should be more examples with interact (I would create a topic "interac

[sage-devel] set_random_seed does not seed Python's random number generator

2012-02-22 Thread William Stein
Hi Sage-Devel, I was very surprised by this just now: sage: import random sage: random.randint(0,20) 0 sage: set_random_seed(0) sage: random.randint(0,20) 0 sage: set_random_seed(0) sage: random.randint(0,20) 5 sage: random.seed(0) sage: random.randint(0,20) 17 sage: random.seed(0) sage: random.r

Re: [sage-devel] Possible sage days on function fields

2012-02-22 Thread Frithjof Schulze
Hi Maarten, On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:41:16AM -0800, Maarten Derickx wrote: > Dear Sage-developers, > > Michiel Kosters and I are currently writing a proposal for the Lorentz > Center [1] in order to organize a sage days on the subject of function > fields. It would be useful for us to have an

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

2012-02-22 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:09, Ivan Andrus wrote: > On Feb 22, 2012, at 6:46 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:42, Ivan Andrus wrote: >>> On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> If yes, we should test it. If no, no worries. >>> >>> Yes.  I have

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

2012-02-22 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Feb 22, 2012, at 6:46 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:42, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >>> If yes, we should test it. >>> >>> If no, no worries. >> >> Yes. I have Xcode 4.2 installed on 10.6. I think Xcode 4.3 is only f

[sage-devel] no trac email notification

2012-02-22 Thread Daniel Krenn
Some days ago I postet in thread "trac attachment notification", see [1], that I don't get mails when a ticket I participated in was changed. I posted there, since I thought there was a connection to an attachment. Now I opened a new ticket (#12564} and didn't get a notification mail. So it seems

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

2012-02-22 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:42, Ivan Andrus wrote: > On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > >> If yes, we should test it. >> >> If no, no worries. > > Yes.  I have Xcode 4.2 installed on 10.6.  I think Xcode 4.3 is only for Lion. This makes sense, and is unfortunate. 4.3 made some ma

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

2012-02-22 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > If yes, we should test it. > > If no, no worries. Yes. I have Xcode 4.2 installed on 10.6. I think Xcode 4.3 is only for Lion. I haven't been following the Lion discussion much. I've been building the 5.0 betas with Xcode 3, should I tr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage works on OS X 10.7!

2012-02-22 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:55, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-02-19 00:12, John H Palmieri wrote: >> Next, there is now no longer a /Developer directory, which means that >> the command xcodebuild (which is run by the prereq script) may fail to >> report the correct version of Xcode. So from the

[sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

2012-02-22 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
If yes, we should test it. If no, no worries. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage works on OS X 10.7!

2012-02-22 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-02-19 00:12, John H Palmieri wrote: > Next, there is now no longer a /Developer directory, which means that > the command xcodebuild (which is run by the prereq script) may fail to > report the correct version of Xcode. So from the shell, you need to run > > $ xcode-select -switch /Appli

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage, gentoo-prefix & lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-22 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:56:13 +0800 Keshav Kini wrote: > Burcin Erocal writes: > >> Just to be clear, sage-on-gentoo itself has no goal of being a way > >> to distribute Sage in general. It is simply a port of Sage and its > >> SPKGs to the Gentoo package management system, using the "overlay" >

Re: [sage-devel] Possible sage days on function fields

2012-02-22 Thread John Cremona
On 22 February 2012 13:41, Maarten Derickx wrote: > Dear Sage-developers, > > Michiel Kosters and I are currently writing a proposal for the Lorentz > Center [1] in order to organize a sage days on the subject of function Great idea! > fields. It would be useful for us to have an estimate of how

[sage-devel] Re: integration bug, segfault

2012-02-22 Thread kcrisman
On Feb 22, 2:10 am, Dan Drake wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 09:44PM -0500, D. S. McNeil wrote: > > > I think it's very appropriate to open a ticket for this.  It would be > > > even more appropriate to try to construct a more minimal > > > counterexample :) but at least then we have it on the

[sage-devel] Possible sage days on function fields

2012-02-22 Thread Maarten Derickx
Dear Sage-developers, Michiel Kosters and I are currently writing a proposal for the Lorentz Center [1] in order to organize a sage days on the subject of function fields. It would be useful for us to have an estimate of how many of you are interested in participating in such a Sage Days. It wo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage + Hadoop

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Raum
Hi Andrew, I would be interested as well. It seems like a fabously efficient way of distributing jobs. >From having a short glance at the webpage I see that you use jpython. I doubt that Sage builds with it, so I wonder whether this can become a problem or not. Best, Martin -- To post to th