Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage 5.10 queue fail

2013-07-02 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Travis, On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:38:18PM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: I think the first one is due to me import the latest version of the iet move patch #8386; thus should be a simple rebase (and I don't think anyone has touched that in a while). The second one is

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Skew tableaux

2013-07-02 Thread Andrew Mathas
On Monday, 1 July 2013 21:06:46 UTC+2, darijgrinberg wrote: This isn't the only thing missing, and it seems that skew_tableau.py never got the love that tableau.py received during development. One many things that skew tableaux (and skew partitions) are currently missing is a latex

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Installing combinat queue

2013-07-02 Thread Andrew Mathas
Thank Travis. I am compiling from source of course. The problem might be that bash install function I wrote uses make all rarher than just make, which is what I used to do by handaccorrding to the makefile these should be equivalent but it is the only difference I can see. Will test when I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sqrt simplification

2013-07-02 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 02:38:44 UTC+2, rjf a écrit : What you've written is just a hack. Of course it's a hack; this is why I did not submit it as a patch for Sage. As far as one restricts oneself to the REAL DOMAIN, I think it works. Please show me a counter-example. Again, let me

Re: [sage-devel] Re: (abs(sin(x))^2).simplify_full()

2013-07-02 Thread Joris Vankerschaver
Hi Michael, Thanks for your message. I'm still a little confused about the way Sage handles assumptions, can you maybe shine your light on this? On Monday, July 1, 2013 8:55:43 PM UTC+1, Michael Orlitzky wrote: sage: u = var('u') sage: assume(u, 'real') This makes an assumption in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: (abs(sin(x))^2).simplify_full()

2013-07-02 Thread Joris Vankerschaver
But the example in my original message works -- this really confuses me. Clearly, simplify_trig invokes maxima to do the simplification, so why does setting this flag in pynac make it work? Are functions of real variables treated differently from functions taking a complex argument? OK,

[sage-devel] Re: Changes in Maxima behavior

2013-07-02 Thread Robert Dodier
On 2013-07-01, Joris Vankerschaver joris.vankerscha...@gmail.com wrote: sage: u, v = var('u, v', domain='real') sage: sqrt(-1/(u^2+v^2-1)).simplify_radical() # This will hang This is a bug in Maxima: (%i2) radcan (sqrt (-1 / (u^2 + v^2 - 1))), domain=complex; It waits apparently forever

Re: [sage-devel] Re: problems installing TOPCOM for triangulations?

2013-07-02 Thread Ursula Whitcher
On 7/1/2013 8:42 PM, Volker Braun wrote: You need to restart the notebook since the test output is cached... Yes, that seems to have solved the problem. You might want to add a note to this effect in the documentation for Triangulations of a point configuration. --Ursula. -- You

Re: [sage-devel] Re: problems installing TOPCOM for triangulations?

2013-07-02 Thread Volker Braun
I agree that this is a usability wart... though really I think the whole idea of installing further components while Sage is running is a bad design choice. For example, if you end up modifying shared libraries that are currently mmaped then bad things will happen. On Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sqrt simplification

2013-07-02 Thread rjf
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 4:48:54 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 02:38:44 UTC+2, rjf a écrit : What you've written is just a hack. Of course it's a hack; this is why I did not submit it as a patch for Sage. As far as one restricts oneself to the REAL