> See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14582 :)
>
>
Still on my todo list...but I'm now waiting until we switch to the git
workflow, which should make the patchbomb easier to swallow...
Best,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" gr
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:33:33 PM UTC-7, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> As long as the coercion graph is constructed lazily, I don't know that
> it's possible to respect the digraph model. For example, if we have X
> -> Y -> Z, the mere creation of Y induces a coercion from X to Z that
> migh
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 12 October 2013 18:21, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe. One important fact is that -- measured by downloads or website
>>> hits -- usage of Sage ("the free software") has *
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 12 October 2013 18:21, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Maybe. One important fact is that -- measured by downloads or website
>> hits -- usage of Sage ("the free software") has *not* grown at all in
>> the last 3 years. For example, if you d
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 12 October 2013 18:21, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Maybe. One important fact is that -- measured by downloads or website
>> hits -- usage of Sage ("the free software") has *not* grown at all in
>> the last 3 years. For example, if you d
The only primary embeddings are stored on the domain is for lifetime
implications. If we can detangle these two (which I've always wanted
to do) then we could always store them on the codomain. It is,
however, useful to be able to query a parent for embeddings (e.g. AA
-> RR for any particular prec
On 12 October 2013 18:21, William Stein wrote:
> Maybe. One important fact is that -- measured by downloads or website
> hits -- usage of Sage ("the free software") has *not* grown at all in
> the last 3 years. For example, if you define number of active users as
> at http://trac.sagemath.org/ti
On Monday, October 14, 2013 9:38:02 PM UTC-7, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> This is definitely a bug,
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15303
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivi
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:26 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Vincent Delecroix
>> <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> thought was that Sage is a math software, open source, with the aim of
>>> being a viable
Ahahaah. Thaaanks ! ;-)
Nathann
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 11:46:54 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:03:38 AM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>>
>> While messing around with #13352, I noticed that there was a
>> preprocessor constant in Sage's GC
10 matches
Mail list logo
