[sage-devel] Re: sage version announcement

2014-03-02 Thread Harald Schilly
That came up before, I think the 6.1.1 is here http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/sage-git/logs/tickets.html and I don't think that the 6.1 file exists?! Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] database-cremona package

2014-03-02 Thread John Cremona
The current version of the database_cremona_ellcurve spkg is indeed 20140101 but I am not sure how to get rid of mention of older versions. I still have an older version sitting in my upstream directory and I don't think anything will cause it to be deleted automatically. Where does the --optiona

Re: [sage-devel] wolfram language

2014-03-02 Thread rjf
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 2:45:47 AM UTC-8, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:26 PM, rjf > > wrote: > > So how does it stack up as > > (a) user experience? > > I have some contact with others teaching MMA, and what struck me when > watching the demo video in regard of UX is

[sage-devel] Re: wolfram language

2014-03-02 Thread rjf
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 1:34:51 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Sunday, March 2, 2014 2:31:56 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote: >> >> The papers you can find from that search might change your mind. How >> hard is it to say >> sine of eks over cosine of eks equals tangent of x ? >> > > sin(x/cos(x

Re: [sage-devel] sage-location

2014-03-02 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 11:33:22 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > The problem is that Sage cannot know in advance that you will *not* move > the Sage tree. Neither does any other software. If you move an installed program then it won't work any more, and we shouldn't go around teaching users

Re: [sage-devel] sage-location

2014-03-02 Thread Felix Salfelder
> On 2014-03-01 18:37, William Stein wrote: > > Forcing sage-location, probably because a new package was installed. > > Updating various hardcoded paths... > > (Please wait at most a few minutes.) > > DO NOT INTERRUPT THIS. > > > >This is a somewhat disturbing waste of time, right?

Re: [sage-devel] wolfram language

2014-03-02 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:26 PM, rjf wrote: > So how does it stack up as > (a) user experience? I have some contact with others teaching MMA, and what struck me when watching the demo video in regard of UX is, that there are two major shortcomings. First, it's inconsistent. If something doesn't

Re: [sage-devel] sage-location

2014-03-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-03-01 18:37, William Stein wrote: Forcing sage-location, probably because a new package was installed. Updating various hardcoded paths... (Please wait at most a few minutes.) DO NOT INTERRUPT THIS. This is a somewhat disturbing waste of time, right? The problem is th

[sage-devel] Re: wolfram language

2014-03-02 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 2:31:56 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote: > > The papers you can find from that search might change your mind. How hard > is it to say > sine of eks over cosine of eks equals tangent of x ? > sin(x/cos(x)) = tan(x) ? Really useful speech input, as in being able to efficiently do