Re: [sage-devel] Re: possibly useful git game-like tutorial

2015-05-17 Thread Volker Braun
I'd be happy to add it to http://www.sagemath.org/git-developer-guide/git_background.html#tutorials-and-summaries, say. Just send a patch ;-) On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 2:33:01 AM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote: Why not just link to the main git homepage at http://git-scm.com/ and let people

[sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-17 Thread Martin Albrecht
Hi all, http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18320 fixes a performance issue with polynomial sequences which are used for multivariate polynomials to e.g. store Gröbner bases and stuff. The patch is very short, it would be nice if someone could look at it as it makes a huge difference for large

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is there an online index of the standard packages shipped in Sage?

2015-05-17 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 12/05/2015 17:19, Thierry a écrit : On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:19:07AM -0700, Volker Braun wrote: IMHO: * The package type (standard/optional/experimental) should be in a file inside the package directory +1. Actually, i have a prototype of this for the purpose of checking to the

Re: [sage-devel] Is Sage living in a state of emergency ?

2015-05-17 Thread Francois Bissey
I’ll add that a lot of people warned of the impeding troubles. And none of these people reviewed the associated tickets. It took me by surprise personally and I didn’t realise the extent of it. As a sage-on-gentoo dev I usually don’t touch that part of sage apart to strip it away for the Gentoo

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-17 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hi Martin, There are a *lot* of tickets which are short, fix bugs, increase speed and are waiting for reviews. If all authors are advertising their tickets it will become a nightmare on sage-devel. If you want your ticket reviewed, it would be better: - looks for somebody that is likely to do

[sage-devel] Re: Broken links to doc already appearing

2015-05-17 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2015-05-16 0:04 GMT+02:00 Harald: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Samuel Lelievre samuel.lelie...@gmail.com wrote: I can try to dig into the fastly documentation, community forum, or ask the support team. Well, not sure if this helps. This fastly CDN is the technology behind the github

[sage-devel] Re: Broken links to doc already appearing

2015-05-17 Thread Harald Schilly
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Samuel Lelièvre samuel.lelie...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. See the page (excerpt below): Cool, thank's for finding this, I'll send them an email! -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To

[sage-devel] Is Sage living in a state of emergency ?

2015-05-17 Thread Thierry
Hi, Ticket #18417 hardcodes the author's own private server (on which the Sage community has no control nor gave any mandate) as part of the Sage source code to serve as a download source when the mirrors are not up-to-date. I consider it as an issue by itself, and made it explicit on the ticket.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is there an online index of the standard packages shipped in Sage?

2015-05-17 Thread Nathann Cohen
We were not talking about a catalog, but an additional file for each package, located in build/pkgs/$package/, which just contains standard, optional, experimental or probably base, say. Done in #18431 (needs review) http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18431 Nathann -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: Is Sage living in a state of emergency ?

2015-05-17 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 1:52:47 PM UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: Ticket #18417 hardcodes the author's own private server (on which the Sage community has no control Thanks, apparently I'm not part of the community. In the same ticket (and perhaps #15642 which is closely

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is Sage living in a state of emergency ?

2015-05-17 Thread John Cremona
On 17 May 2015 at 13:31, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 1:52:47 PM UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: Ticket #18417 hardcodes the author's own private server (on which the Sage community has no control Thanks, apparently I'm not part of the