Re: [sage-devel] A suggestion for "make"

On 2015-05-24 20:41, john_perry_usm wrote: Does it seem reasonable to add a prompt at the beginning of the Makefile that points this out, suggests './sage -b' if they just want to fix some changes I am very much against this. The normal way to rebuild is to use "make", while "./sage -b" should o

Re: [sage-devel] A short description of what "Sage days" are on the wiki page

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I just noticed that the wiki page on "Sage Days" [2] can be reached > quite easily from Sage's website [1]. Thus, we can expect many persons > (ignorant of our customs and traditions) to read it. > > This page is actuall

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Monday, 25 May 2015 20:17:49 UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just curious -- is this intentional? >> >> 1. Build sage. >> 2. Type "./sage -bdist ..." >> 3. Extract the resulting tarball elsewhere >> 4. Type "make" inside the ex

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Web Interface

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, mmarco wrote: > I am really impressed by the fact that a 10 year old can be fascinated by > sage. Find one and help them play with a worksheet, and you'll be surprised. My 7 year old nephew gets pretty fascinated by Sage too. It just helps to work *with* them, si

[sage-devel] Re: documentation bug: git-trac instructions don't mention git commit

The preceeding section explains how to make local edits and commit them (see http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/walk_through.html#commits-snapshots). The only thing that the "git-trac section" adds is how to exchange commits over the internet. This is why there is no special mention of h

[sage-devel] documentation bug: git-trac instructions don't mention git commit

I found a documentation "bug": literally following the instructions for ticket creation and updates at http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/git_trac.html results in the publication of empty tickets, because there's no mention of *committing* changes. This is now ticket 18504: http://trac

[sage-devel] Re: Web Interface

I am really impressed by the fact that a 10 year old can be fascinated by sage. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroup

[sage-devel] Re: sage binaries useless for development

On Monday, 25 May 2015 20:17:49 UTC+1, William wrote: > > Hi, > > Just curious -- is this intentional? > > 1. Build sage. > 2. Type "./sage -bdist ..." > 3. Extract the resulting tarball elsewhere > 4. Type "make" inside the extracted directory. BOOM! Total disaster. > Has it ever worked

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageManifolds 0.8

Le lundi 25 mai 2015 19:21:47 UTC+2, William a écrit : > > Hi, > > SageManifolds 0.8 is now available by default in SageMathCloud. > > Thanks! Eric. PS: an example SMC worksheet is here .

[sage-devel] sage binaries useless for development

Hi, Just curious -- is this intentional? 1. Build sage. 2. Type "./sage -bdist ..." 3. Extract the resulting tarball elsewhere 4. Type "make" inside the extracted directory. BOOM! Total disaster. It starts by trying to download tarballs from the internet, etc... -- William -- William (http:

[sage-devel] A short description of what "Sage days" are on the wiki page

Hello everybody, I just noticed that the wiki page on "Sage Days" [2] can be reached quite easily from Sage's website [1]. Thus, we can expect many persons (ignorant of our customs and traditions) to read it. This page is actually quite clean and up-to-date, but it was lacking a short paragraph a

[sage-devel] What kind of pictures to documentation?

Nathann Cohen made it possible to add pictures to documentation. So, what now? Let's start with concrete example: complements of an element on a lattice. It could be something like .. PLOT:: L=LatticePoset({0:['A', 'x', 'B'], 'A': ['y'], 'x': ['y', 'C'], 'B'$

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageManifolds 0.8

Hi, SageManifolds 0.8 is now available by default in SageMathCloud. William On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > The base code for parallelization in SageManifolds 0.8 has been submitted as > ticket #18100 (ready for review). > Note that this regards only the parallelizati

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Why \wedge works but \vee does not?

On Mon, 25 May 2015, John H Palmieri wrote: For me, it works using a raw string:     title=r"$A \wedge B=1$ and $A \vee B=0$". Thanks, it works! (Of course... I stupid.) -- Jori Mäntysalo

[sage-devel] Re: Web Interface

Hi John, On 2015-05-25, John Foster wrote: > Is there any web based or even console based interface to all of Sage. > Just wondering if I missed it. I found this, it's not what I need just > an example: > > https://mathway.com/ As was pointed out by Dima, SageMathCloud provides a web interface

[sage-devel] Re: Why \wedge works but \vee does not?

For me, it works using a raw string: title=r"$A \wedge B=1$ and $A \vee B=0$". Have you tried that? (I don't know if it's a bug: I think it's always safer to use raw strings when the strings contain backslashes.) John On Monday, May 25, 2015 at 1:48:30 AM UTC-7, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: Web Interface

On Monday, 25 May 2015 15:04:32 UTC+1, John Foster wrote: > > Is there any web based or even console based interface to all of Sage. cloud.sagemath.com > > Just wondering if I missed it. I found this, it's not what I need just > an example: > > https://mathway.com/ > > I'm looking for a

[sage-devel] Web Interface

Is there any web based or even console based interface to all of Sage. Just wondering if I missed it. I found this, it's not what I need just an example: https://mathway.com/ I'm looking for a way for "newbies", non-programmers or students, to use Sage. This includes myself as I'm not a mathe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Why \wedge works but \vee does not?

On Mon, 25 May 2015, Volker Braun wrote: Looks like a bug in matplotlib's internal TeX processor. It does understand e.g. \curlyvee which, one would have thought, is more obscure.  OK. Somebody wants to open ticket for them? At least this works with newest version available for Fedora 21, so

[sage-devel] Re: Why \wedge works but \vee does not?

Looks like a bug in matplotlib's internal TeX processor. It does understand e.g. \curlyvee which, one would have thought, is more obscure. On Monday, May 25, 2015 at 10:48:30 AM UTC+2, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > Strange: > > L=LatticePoset({0:['A', 'x', 'B'], 'A': ['y'], 'x': ['y', 'C'], 'B':

[sage-devel] Why \wedge works but \vee does not?

Strange: L=LatticePoset({0:['A', 'x', 'B'], 'A': ['y'], 'x': ['y', 'C'], 'B': ['C'], 'y': [1], 'C': [1]}) L.show(figsize=3, vertex_colors={'gray': [0,1,'x', 'y'], '#ff': ['A'], '#00ff00': ['B', 'C']}, title="$A \wedge B=1$ and $A \vee B=0$.") It seems that \wedge works, but \vee does not.