Re: [sage-devel] Re: An Arabic translation of "A Tour of Sage"

Thank you very much. 2016-03-02 23:40 GMT+03:00 François Bissey : > On 03/03/16 09:39, Ahmed Alharbi wrote: > >> As soon as I receive my login credentials, I will open >> a ticket. >> > > Should be in your inbox by now. If not check your spam > folder. I can

Re: [sage-devel] Re: An Arabic translation of "A Tour of Sage"

On 03/03/16 09:39, Ahmed Alharbi wrote: As soon as I receive my login credentials, I will open a ticket. Should be in your inbox by now. If not check your spam folder. I can re-send you the details from another email adress if necessary. Francois -- You received this message because you

[sage-devel] Re: An Arabic translation of "A Tour of Sage"

Please excuse my tardy reply. "Is there a ticket open for this? Thank you for undertaking this!" No, there is not. As soon as I receive my login credentials, I will open a ticket. Thank you for reminding me. "There are many languages but not arabic. It's all latex... " I had been fighting with

Re: [sage-devel] 2 questions about aliases

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Bruno Grenet wrote: 2. When renaming a method, should we put an alias, or a deprecated alias? We could also have "internal deprecation". I.e. remove foo() from all documentation and use only bar(). Then second stage would be real deprecation. But for now we don't even

Re: [sage-devel] 2 questions about aliases

On 2016-03-02 20:02, Bruno Grenet wrote: Dear all, 1. Should we use aliases when some object/concept has several names in mathematics? * Pro: Make the method easier to find * Con: Too many method names makes searching via tab-completion for instance more difficult I

[sage-devel] 2 questions about aliases

Dear all, 1. Should we use aliases when some object/concept has several names in mathematics? - Pro: Make the method easier to find - Con: Too many method names makes searching via tab-completion for instance more difficult 2. When renaming a method, should we put an

[sage-devel] Re: GSoc 2016 - Hyperplane Arrangements

On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:23:17 UTC+5:30, mmarco wrote: > > Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to > Sage? > > Apart from functionalities mentioned by Jayamine I found following implementations not present in Sage 1) Euler characteristics of Affine

Re: [sage-devel] Re: subs deprecation -- what the heck?!

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Nils Bruin wrote: > On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 5:23:36 PM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote: >> >> If I recall correctly, Jason Grout's example for this is >> >> x+y-y >> >> which becomes x but in principle had two variables, so how do you know >> which one is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: subs deprecation -- what the heck?!

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 5:23:36 PM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote: > > If I recall correctly, Jason Grout's example for this is > > x+y-y > > which becomes x but in principle had two variables, so how do you know > which one is "right"? > Hm, I'm not sure that's a problem here. Indeed if both are

[sage-devel] Re: GSoc 2016 - Hyperplane Arrangements

Hi, I'm also interested at this project. On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:23:17 PM UTC+5:30, mmarco wrote: > > Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to > Sage? > I roughly went through 1) Hyperplane Arrangement sage 2) Hyperplane Arrangement

[sage-devel] GSOC 2016 - Hyperplane arrangement

Hi, I'm also interested at this project. On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:23:17 PM UTC+5:30, mmarco wrote: > Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to > Sage? > > El martes, 1 de marzo de 2016, 17:44:24 (UTC+1), AKSHAY AJAGEKAR escribió: >> >> Hi, >> I am

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in computing the Hilbert series of an ideal of minors in a matrix

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 9:36:20 AM UTC, luisfe wrote: > > Looks like a Singular error, the first Hilbert series and second Hilbert > series returned are not consistent: > > indeed. > {{{ > sage: gb = I.groebner_basis() > sage: h1=hilb(gb,1) > // ** _ is no standard basis > sage:

[sage-devel] First SageDays in Israel (SageDays79)

Hi everyone, I am pleased to let you know that the first SageDays in Israel are going to take place in *November 21 to 25* 2016! https://wiki.sagemath.org/days79 The aim of the SageDays will be to gather the users of the region for the first time and hopefully create new collaborations with

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in computing the Gröbner fan of an ideal of minors in a matrix

This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20146 in case anyone wants to have a look. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Bug in computing the Gröbner fan of an ideal of minors in a matrix

Hi, (after having a Singular bug in the computation of its Hilbert series, i now have a bug in computing the Gröbner fan: First one annoyance (yes, x1 is a prefix of x11) that I want to point out: {{{ sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ,3*5,"x"); x = P.gens(); M = Matrix(3,x) sage: M [ x0 x1 x2 x3

[sage-devel] Re: GSoc 2016 - Hyperplane Arrangements

Can you enumerate the functionalities in Macaulay2 that could be added to Sage? El martes, 1 de marzo de 2016, 17:44:24 (UTC+1), AKSHAY AJAGEKAR escribió: > > Hi, > I am Akshay Ajagekar, currently an undergrad at the Indian Institute of > Technology. > I have been exploring Sage for a few weeks

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in computing the Hilbert series of an ideal of minors in a matrix

Looks like a Singular error, the first Hilbert series and second Hilbert series returned are not consistent: {{{ sage: gb = I.groebner_basis() sage: h1=hilb(gb,1) // ** _ is no standard basis sage: h2=hilb(gb,2) // ** _ is no standard basis sage: Zt=ZZ['t'] sage:

[sage-devel] Bug in computing the Hilbert series of an ideal of minors in a matrix

Hi, if I compute the Hilbert series of the ideal generated by all 2x2 minors in a 4x10 matrix of variables, everything works well. But if I increase the number of columns to 11, the outcome is false. I created a ticket at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20145 -- I would appreciate if someone