Re: [sage-devel] Re: mailing list administration

> Should we start a process of nominating/electing moderators? Before that, we should decide what the process is. That's something that might be complicated to do via email (remember what happened with the code of conduct). In my opinion, a Sage Days completely dedicated to this kind of issues wo

[sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

> ... which was less of a problem with our "legacy" spkgs, as you in many > cases could simply install an older or a more recent version when > available /somewhere/, or even easily create your own, just replacing > the upstream version in the src/ folder. > > More or less just out of curiosi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: mailing list administration

On 2016-08-25 10:01, Luca De Feo wrote: > [...] Even though you do not have the power to do the same with Sage > as what just happened with MariaDB [...] What did just happen to MariaDB? (I am asking as I have no glue what you speak about; Google brings up something, but this all seems not relate

[sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

By the way I've got all we need for the upgrade. Just got to put it into a branch. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegr

[sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

kcrisman wrote: > > I think maybe even a better distinction than "sage-the-distro" is to > call it "SageMath, the Application". As far as users of the > application are concerned I agree the it should have the goal of being > a general purpose stack of mathematics software. For s

Re: [sage-devel] mailing list administration

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:33 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > >>> > I deleted it as flame bait. I'm sick of people using sage-devel as a >>> > forum to attack others >>> I have set Nathann to moderated posting on sage-devel. IMHO, his last several posts were flame-bait and go in sage-flame not sage-de

Re: [sage-devel] mailing list administration

> I deleted it as flame bait. I'm sick of people using sage-devel as a >> > forum to attack others >> >> I'm sick of it too. But this kind of unilateral actions only fuels the >> flame, it does not extinguish it. >> >> Especially given your position as a CEO of a for profit company, William.

[sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

There is a SAGE accounting with is very interfering if you don't write sagemath in a research ! Le samedi 20 août 2016 16:09:20 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > > While trying my hand at porting > R 3.3.1 to Sage (needs_review, by the way), I found

[sage-devel] Re: mailing list administration

On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 9:01:54 AM UTC+1, Luca De Feo wrote: > > > I deleted it as flame bait. I'm sick of people using sage-devel as a > > forum to attack others > > I'm sick of it too. But this kind of unilateral actions only fuels the > flame, it does not extinguish it. > > Especia

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

> I think maybe even a better distinction than "sage-the-distro" is to > call it "SageMath, the Application". As far as users of the > application are concerned I agree the it should have the goal of being > a general purpose stack of mathematics software. For short I'll call > the applicat

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:58 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 4:54:45 PM UTC-4, leif wrote: >> >> kcrisman wrote: >> > >> > Make R optional? (Nothing in Sage depends on it, except for the >> > interface to it, including Rpy2.) >> > >> > Gosh, R has been standard fo

Re: [sage-devel] mailing list administration

On Aug 25, 2016 10:18, "William Stein" wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 24, 2016, Luca De Feo wrote: >> >> > I deleted it as flame bait. I'm sick of people using sage-devel as a >> > forum to attack others >> >> I'm sick of it too. But this kind of unilateral actions only fuels the flame, it

[sage-devel] Re: git trac push error

Ok, we solved it by a force push. The weird was probably because of french accents in git log error. Julien Le jeudi 25 août 2016 10:06:31 UTC+2, Julien Lavauzelle a écrit : > > Hi, > > I have the following git trac push error: > > Pushing to Trac #20100... > Guessed remote branch: u/jlavauzel

Re: [sage-devel] mailing list administration

On Wednesday, August 24, 2016, Luca De Feo wrote: > > I deleted it as flame bait. I'm sick of people using sage-devel as a > > forum to attack others > > I'm sick of it too. But this kind of unilateral actions only fuels the > flame, it does not extinguish it. > > Especially given your position

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] (William Stein) "my top priority right now is to **make a lot of money**"

Why is this still being discussed? It belongs on the flame list. On Aug 24, 2016, at 13:12 , Nathann Cohen wrote: > Quote from William Stein, CEO of SageMath Inc (private for-profit > Delaware company) [1] > >So there is no confusion, my top priority right now is to **make a lot >of mon

[sage-devel] git trac push error

Hi, I have the following git trac push error: Pushing to Trac #20100... Guessed remote branch: u/jlavauzelle/cyclic_code Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/git-trac", line 18, in cmdline.launch() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/git_trac/cmdline.py", line

[sage-devel] Re: mailing list administration

> I deleted it as flame bait. I'm sick of people using sage-devel as a > forum to attack others I'm sick of it too. But this kind of unilateral actions only fuels the flame, it does not extinguish it. Especially given your position as a CEO of a for profit company, William. Even though you d