There is a SAGE accounting with is very interfering if you don't write 
sagemath in a research !

Le samedi 20 août 2016 16:09:20 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
> While trying my hand <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20523> at porting 
> R 3.3.1 to Sage (needs_review, by the way), I found this in the current R 
> Installation and Administration manual 
> <https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#Cygwin> :
>
> > C.8 Cygwin
> > 
> > The 32-bit version has never worked well enough to pass R’s make check, 
> and residual support from
> > earlier experiments was removed in R 3.3.0.
> > 
> > The 64-bit version is completely unsupported.
>
> Maybe we should consider to have an interface to system's R rather than 
> our own version (and therefore make it an optional package)
>
> It would be more difficult (but not impossible) to offer the same kind of 
> access to an external R as to a tightly-knit R. I'm thinking graphics, 
> notebook(s) integration, etc...
>
> OTOH, the existence of a good R interface (Rpy2) could make things easier. 
> The largest problem that one can forecast is, of course, backwards 
> compatibility in existing programs.
>
>
> On the third hand, what can be said if the future of a native Windows port 
> of Sage, which could do without Cygwin monkeying ? I understand that a) 
> it's not really easy and b) some significant advances have been made 
> recently...
>
> Ideas, suggestions, etc ?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to