Mon 2018-03-19 21:30:59 UTC:
>
> On a separate issue, I find it sad to have to use Google to contact Sage.
The questions and answers site "Ask Sage" at https://ask.sagemath.org/
lets you ask questions in a different environment.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Related ticket, mentioning var and automatic_names:
- SageMath #9048: inconsistencies between the terminal version and the
notebook
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9048
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from t
Was it an upgrade from a previous version of sage?
> On 20/03/2018, at 10:29, malc1519 via sage-devel
> wrote:
>
> I was trying to build Sage 8.1 on a Dell Inspiron 5000 2-in-1, with i7
> processor,
> running Scientific Linux 7.x. I got the following
>
> [scipy-0.19.1] Error installing packag
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Thierry
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:32:23AM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
>> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:04:07 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >- Some functions (mostly inherited from Maxima) *do* already create
>> >new symbol
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> It looks like, just from reading the Jupyter docs, this where we can
> control what '?' returns at the kernel level:
> http://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/messaging.html#introspection
>
> So if Sage could just return a snippet of the a
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:32:23AM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:04:07 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >- Some functions (mostly inherited from Maxima) *do* already create
> >new symbolic variables, but do not inject them in the relevant
> >
Hi,
Another issue involving the Jupyter notebook and LaTeX is that typeset
outputs, which are correctly rendered with MathJax in the browser, are no
longer typeset when exporting the notebook to pdf:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23330
Probably the two issues are not related (or maybe they
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 8:04:07 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
>
>
>- Some functions (mostly inherited from Maxima) *do* already create
>new symbolic variables, but do not inject them in the relevant namespace.
>In *this* case (and this case only), I'd like to have this
Addendum to the previous answer : solve at least may generate symbolic
constants with domain constraints. If we accept the idea of auto-declaring
them, should we add the relevant constraints ? Example :
sage: var("x,y")
(x, y)
sage: solve([3*x+y==0,6*x==-2*y],[x,y])
[[x == -1/3*r1, y == r1]]
Sim
To summarize the previous answers (and nitpick a bit) : automatic_names
- may come handy ;
- shouldn't be mandatory
- shouldn't be the default
- should print a warning when fired.
I also liked the idea of introducing a new magic controlling that feature.
However, I have a couple o
On 19/03/18 15:06, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:49:02AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
[...] However, most CASes now available do away without this mandatory
declaration.
And hence Sage should have automatic_na
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:49:02AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
> > [...] However, most CASes now available do away without this mandatory
> > declaration.
>
> And hence Sage should have automatic_names as a non-default *option*.
Y
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 11:52:55 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11:44:33 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit :
> >>
> >> This question raised an issue I was not aware of (and didn't see any
> >> exi
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
> Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11:44:33 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit :
>>
>> This question raised an issue I was not aware of (and didn't see any
>> existing tickets for):
>>
>> https://ask.sagemath.org/question/41592/inside-help-not-processed
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11:44:33 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit :
>>>
>>> This question raised an issue I was not aware of (and didn't see any
>>> existing tickets for):
>>>
>>> h
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
> Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11:44:33 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit :
>>
>> This question raised an issue I was not aware of (and didn't see any
>> existing tickets for):
>>
>> https://ask.sagemath.org/question/41592/inside-help-not-processed
Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11:44:33 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit :
>
> This question raised an issue I was not aware of (and didn't see any
> existing tickets for):
>
> https://ask.sagemath.org/question/41592/inside-help-not-processed/#
>
> When viewing docs for Sage objects in the Jupyter Notebook, th
This question raised an issue I was not aware of (and didn't see any
existing tickets for):
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/41592/inside-help-not-processed/#
When viewing docs for Sage objects in the Jupyter Notebook, they are
just displayed as plain text--this is a major shortcoming over SageN
18 matches
Mail list logo