Re: [sage-devel] CentOS binary (via binary-pkg)

2020-06-22 Thread Franco Saliola
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:47 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 20:30 Franco Saliola, wrote: > >> >> Btw, do you know what the issue is with using conda? >> >> >> I'm new to using these specific machines, but the link below says t

Re: [sage-devel] CentOS binary (via binary-pkg)

2020-06-22 Thread Franco Saliola
ng conda? > > Isuru > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:09 PM Franco Saliola wrote: > >> >> Hi Isuru, >> >> Thank you for the suggestion. I looked into this, and although it looks >> intriguing, there seems to be a site policy of avoiding conda on the >>

Re: [sage-devel] CentOS binary (via binary-pkg)

2020-06-22 Thread Franco Saliola
tml/en/installation/conda.html > > Isuru > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:44 PM Franco Saliola wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to create a binary for CentOS 7. I have not been able to find >> a guide on how to create binaries, so I've been piec

[sage-devel] CentOS binary (via binary-pkg)

2020-06-20 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello, I am trying to create a binary for CentOS 7. I have not been able to find a guide on how to create binaries, so I've been piecing together the procedure from various sources and so I have a few questions. First of all, my goal is to use sage on a cluster running CentOS 7. I can't insta

Re: [sage-devel] compiling without internet access

2020-06-18 Thread Franco Saliola
Hi Dima! On Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 4:31:36 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:13 PM Franco Saliola > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Any ideas on how to compile sage on a machine with internet access? The &

[sage-devel] compiling without internet access

2020-06-18 Thread Franco Saliola
Hi everyone, Any ideas on how to compile sage on a machine with internet access? The installation process downloads various source tarballs, but I cannot do this. There seems to be a "make download" command to preemptively download all standard upstream source tarballs, but it is broken: > ma

Re: [sage-devel] Re: run doctests of a single function

2016-11-17 Thread Franco Saliola
and should be saved for a different patch. Hope you had a good class. Franco > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Franco Saliola > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:47:04 AM UTC-5, Erik Bray wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: run doctests of a single function

2016-11-16 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:47:04 AM UTC-5, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Jan Groenewald > wrote: > > Hi > > > > On 16 November 2016 at 14:35, Simon King > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Franco, > >> > >

[sage-devel] run doctests of a single function

2016-11-15 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello, I'm wondering whether there is a way to run the doctests of a single function. Something like this: def f(): r""" sage: f() 42 """ return 41 run_doctests(f) (Note: there is a command called run_doctests, which runs all tests in a file / module, which I find very usef

[sage-devel] Re: ### detaching file code.sage because it does not exist (deleted?) ###

2015-09-15 Thread Franco Saliola
On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 5:46:45 AM UTC-4, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 11:03:17 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Did you try :set backupcopy=yes in vim? >> > > Thank you! You save my life! > I also experience this problem sometimes, and especially wh

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-18 Thread Franco Saliola
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 2:05:54 PM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 1:27:30 AM UTC+2, William wrote: >> >> I'm also curious if anybody has any -- possibly *radical* -- suggestions >> about how to address this >> problem using new ideas. > > > Use Docker (or bo

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Franco Saliola wrote: > > > On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 6:27:28 PM UTC-5, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola >> wrote: >> > >> > Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'

[sage-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC (was: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report)

2015-06-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 6:15:44 AM UTC-5, Darij Grinberg wrote: > > Hi Anne, > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Anne Schilling > wrote: > > The SageMathCloud was great for those who had trouble installing Sage on > their own computer. Sometimes we had connection issues to the SMC (the

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-12 Thread Franco Saliola
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 6:27:28 PM UTC-5, William Stein wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola > wrote: > > > > Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is > not > > official. > > Thanks to A

[sage-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-12 Thread Franco Saliola
Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is not official. Thanks to Anne Schilling for helping to prepare this. - 24 tickets on trac are tagged with `sagedays65` or `sd65`. Some of these have been positively reviewed and marked as fixed. Some are waiting for review (h

[sage-devel] "The SageMath Foundation"

2015-06-01 Thread Franco Saliola
Hey William, What is the goal of this organization and the relationship with the organization that runs SMC? Perhaps a question to the lawyers about the coexistence of the two organizations might be a good idea? Franco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [sage-devel] European Horizon 2020 project OpenDreamKit accepted

2015-05-20 Thread Franco Saliola
Congratulations! I'm in awe! And a big thank you for your tireless efforts to the SageMath project and to computational mathematics as a whole. Best, Franco On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 6:27:51 AM UTC-4, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:22:06PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wro

Re: [sage-devel] Poll: Supplemental graphical visualizations

2015-05-05 Thread Franco Saliola
[X] Yes, I want graphical user interfaces that make use of the graphical abilities and I want Sage to be superior to Mathematica (especially for expert users) Franco On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 6:17:41 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 10:53:04 AM UTC+2, Nicolas M. Th

Re: [sage-devel] GP/PARI hangs with sage-6.4.1/6.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

2015-02-25 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 5:35:33 AM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Thanks for the trace. > > Unfortunately, it doesn't really help me. Can you temporarily remove > ~/.inputrc and try again? > Wow! Removing ~/.inputrc fixed the problem! (Specifically, all tests pass with 'make ptes

Re: [sage-devel] GP/PARI hangs with sage-6.4.1/6.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

2015-02-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 3:33:54 PM UTC-5, Snark wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 22/02/2015 20:34, Franco Saliola a écrit : > > Hello sage-devel, > > > > I sent the following email to sage-release, but I think it really > belongs > > here. I'm looki

Re: [sage-devel] GP/PARI hangs with sage-6.4.1/6.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

2015-02-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 9:25:53 AM UTC-5, Franco Saliola wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2015-02-22 20:34, Franco Saliola wrote: >> > o gp('2 + 3') hangs in sage >> W

Re: [sage-devel] GP/PARI hangs with sage-6.4.1/6.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

2015-02-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2015-02-22 20:34, Franco Saliola wrote: > > o gp('2 + 3') hangs in sage > What's the contents of ~/.sage/gp-expect.log after doing just this in a > Sage session? > Intere

Re: [sage-devel] GP/PARI hangs with sage-6.4.1/6.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

2015-02-24 Thread Franco Saliola
GP/PARI interface that are causing sage to hang. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Franco > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: *Franco Saliola* sal...@gmail.com >> > > Date: Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:21 PM > > Subject: [sage-relea

[sage-devel] GP/PARI hangs with sage-6.4.1/6.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS

2015-02-22 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello sage-devel, I sent the following email to sage-release, but I think it really belongs here. I'm looking for ideas on how to debug (or better, how to fix) the problems with GP/PARI interface that are causing sage to hang. Thanks, Franco -- Forwarded message -- From: F

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: code of conduct - ends Monday at midnight, PST.

2014-11-24 Thread Franco Saliola
[X] Yes -- adopt the code of conduct stated below (*) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this gro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Code of Conduct

2014-11-20 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:06:53 PM UTC-5, William wrote: > > Can somebody help me count the votes? I made pass through this long > and complicated thread, and here's what I seem to have got: > > FOR a code of conduct, possibly suitably word-smithed (7): > > Jan Groenewald > Travis Scr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: a good name the category of algebras that are not necessarily associative nor unital

2013-07-05 Thread Franco Saliola
On Jul 5, 2013 7:41 AM, "Simon King" wrote: > > Hi Franco, > > On 2013-07-05, Franco Saliola wrote: > > I like the idea of being able to do > > > > categories. > > > > and seeing a list of the available categories (or some reasonable subset

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RFC: a good name the category of algebras that are not necessarily associative nor unital

2013-07-05 Thread Franco Saliola
On Jul 5, 2013 7:13 AM, "Simon King" wrote: > > Hi Dima, > > On 2013-07-05, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> In fact, I don't understand why Algebras has to be in the global namespace. > >> I've never once found it useful to start an interactive session by > >> instantiating a new category. > > +1 > >

Re: [sage-devel] LibGAP spkg vote!

2012-09-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > LibGAP (the C library interface to GAP) is finally usable and ready to be > released into the wild! We will ship it as a separate spkg since > * Upstream doesn't build a shared library > * The build system is replaced by standard autotools

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Patchbot applying an unwanted patch

2012-09-02 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-09-02 20:10, Simon King wrote: >> That's for the patchbot, which only reads the comments, but not the >> ticket description. > IMHO, that's still a bug in the patchbot. > >> If you want to help the release manager once the ticket has

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Patchbot applying an unwanted patch

2012-09-02 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Simon King wrote: > And if the ticket has several patches posted, but > only my_fine.patch and my_better.patch are to be applied *in that > order*, then write > > Apply my_fine.patch my_better.patch > > in some comment. Is the "in that order" new? Around mid-July,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is it better to fold patches?

2012-08-30 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Simon King wrote: > Hi all! > > On 2012-08-30, Francois Bissey wrote: >> On 30/08/12 23:19, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> On 2012-08-30 13:17, Simon King wrote: Hi! This is a question to the release manager(s): Assume that there are five patch

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linear Algebra thematic tutorial

2012-06-12 Thread Franco Saliola
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Nils Bruin wrote: > On Jun 3, 12:58 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: >> By the way, you can also define infinite-dimensional vector spaces this way. > > Ah, that probably explains why non-trivial linear algebra > functionality is missing on this class. I don't think you

Re: [sage-devel] Interface for evaluation of polynomials distinguishes between 1 and >1 variables

2012-05-09 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello Darij! On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:04 PM, darijgrinberg wrote: > Hello, > > I am not sure whether this can be called a bug, but I've noticed a > weirdness while working with Sage (5.0). > > For any positive integer n, I can define a ring > R(n) = PolynomialRing(QQ, polynames(n)), > where polyn

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.0.rc0 released

2012-05-02 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Dear Sage lovers, > > We're releasing Sage 5.0.rc0. > > Please build, test, and report!  We'd love to hear about your > experiences with this release. Same doctest errors with 'make ptest' as for beta14: $ uname -a Darwin lacim-macpro-02 10

[sage-devel] Sage Days 38 - Registration and Funding Requests

2012-03-05 Thread Franco Saliola
The official website for Sage Days 38 is now live, through which you can register and request financial support. So register soon! Sage Days 38 CRM, Montreal, May 7--11, 2012 Official webpage: http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/2012/Sage12/index_e.php Wiki page: http://wiki.sagemath.org/d

[sage-devel] Re: sage days numbering

2012-01-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Dan Drake wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 at 01:41PM -0500, Franco Saliola wrote: >> Hello everyone. >> >> We will be organizing a Sage Days in Montreal (7-11 May), and we want >> to claim a number in order to start announcing, advertis

[sage-devel] sage days numbering

2012-01-22 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello everyone. We will be organizing a Sage Days in Montreal (7-11 May), and we want to claim a number in order to start announcing, advertising, etc. On the wiki page Sage Days 36 has been claimed, and it is written: Sage Days X, for some X > 36: April 2012, Suwon, South Korea. Sage Days Y, fo

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Call for vote: lrcalc as standard or optional spkg?

2011-06-28 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: >      Hi, > >> With Mike and Anne we are about to finalize an interface with lrcalc: >> >> -- >> #10333: An interface to Anders Buch's Littlewood-Richardson Calculat

Re: [sage-devel] Re: remove pstricks from default latex preamble ?

2011-05-08 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:46 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Sunday, May 8, 2011 9:20:18 AM UTC-7, Franco Saliola wrote: > [snip] >> >> So, I'm wondering whether we should remove pstricks from the default >> latex preamble. > > I think that&#x

[sage-devel] remove pstricks from default latex preamble ?

2011-05-08 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello, At Sage Days 30 we noticed some problems with trying to ``view`` a graph using pdflatex on Mac OS X. It seems to be related to having pstricks loaded as part of the default latex preamble: {{{ ! LaTeX Error: You have run the document with pdflatex, but PSTricks requir

Re: [sage-devel] bug in interactive mode?

2010-12-08 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Christian Stump wrote: > Salut, > > here is the code in the notebook: > > class Goo(): >   def interact(self): >       @interact >       def _(n=selector([0,1,2],nrows=1,default=0, label="label")): >           return >   interactive=interact > > if you run > > Goo()

Re: [sage-devel] What are the hardware and software on sage.math and bsd.math ?

2010-06-25 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Jason Hill wrote: > > You can chop it up a bit for readability too. This is tested on Debian and > Red Hat. > > $ uname -a > $ cat /etc/issue > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -m 1 "model name" > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "processor" # number of cores > or $ cat /p

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-support] Is there an efficient method of producing indexed variables?

2010-04-02 Thread Franco Saliola
I forgot to more the conversation below from sage-support to sage-devel. -- Forwarded message -- From: Franco Saliola Date: Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [sage-support] Is there an efficient method of producing indexed variables? To: sage-supp...@googlegroups.com On

[sage-devel] Sage Days at the Fields Institute

2010-03-31 Thread Franco Saliola
. Questions should be directed to Franco Saliola . Sincerely Yours, The organizing committee Nantel Bergeron, York University Franco Saliola, Fields Institute Mike Zabrocki, York University -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an

[sage-devel] how to set up a private sage server for a small group

2010-03-17 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello everyone, I want to set up a private notebook server for a small group of people, but the documentation for notebook? does not contain any examples for configuring such a server. It also points to a wiki page [1], which doesn't have the information, and to what seems to be a non-existent cha

[sage-devel] pexpect: to upgrade or not to upgrade?

2010-03-06 Thread Franco Saliola
I recently stumbled over a bug in the pexpect module shipped with Sage. It turns out that specifying the full path to a command doesn't work; you get an UnboundLocalError exception. I've created a ticket with an example: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8471 The question is, do we pa

[sage-devel] RuntimeError: Unexpected EOF from Gap

2010-01-25 Thread Franco Saliola
Hopefully someone more familiar with the Gap interface can answer this question. A long-running computation that used Gap just terminated with the following error: RuntimeError: Unexpected EOF from Gap executing I imagine that Gap finished its computation and that the interface couldn't

Fwd: [sage-devel] Developing new classes

2009-07-30 Thread Franco Saliola
Dear Victor, I'm forwarding your email to sage-combinat-devel since that group is going to eventually want to create modules over finite groups. They may even have some experimental code already. Take care, Franco -- -- Forwarded message -- From: VictorMiller Date: Tue, Jul 28

[sage-devel] Re: Catalan Numbers

2009-07-23 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Tom Boothby wrote: > Richard Stanley currently lists 172 combinatorial interpretations of > the Catalan numbers.  I've been doing some research on Coxeter groups > this summer, and we recently found that a class of permutations in S_n > which are counted by the Cat

[sage-devel] Re: Good news about unladen-swallow Python branch

2009-07-18 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Tim Lahey wrote: >> >> It looks like the unladen-swallow Python branch >> has been making good progress. They now can >> pass their test suite of third party packages >> (including NumPy and SymPy). >> >> ht

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] showcasing your features in Sage 4.1

2009-07-10 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The Sage 4.1 milestone is now over and the merge window for Sage 4.1.1 > is open. A release note will be posted to sage-devel and sage-announce > in a day or two. A draft of the release tour for Sage 4.1 can be found > at > > h

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-4.1.rc0 released

2009-07-06 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Robert Miller wrote: > > Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar

[sage-devel] Re: 4.1.alpha2 released

2009-06-27 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Tom Boothby wrote: > > Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/releases I tested upgrading from alpha0, but as suspected, it doesn't work. Complains about missing mercurial and jinja. (Ubuntu 9.04, amd64). Fr

[sage-devel] Re: #6343: Adds SageObject.check() generic testing framework

2009-06-23 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0200, William Stein wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas M

[sage-devel] Re: Rich comparison for Elements

2009-06-22 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Franco Saliola wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Here is a quick description of what is below: Subclasses of Element >> complain that no sorting algorithm is defined even whe

[sage-devel] Rich comparison for Elements

2009-06-22 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello, Here is a quick description of what is below: Subclasses of Element complain that no sorting algorithm is defined even when all the rich comparison methods have been implemented. Bug? In the code sample below, C is a class that inherits from Element and implements all the rich comparison

[sage-devel] Re: "What can Magma do that Sage can't do?"

2009-06-12 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:57:51PM +0200, Franco Saliola wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:47 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> > XIII. Representation Theory >> > >> >   * Characte

[sage-devel] Re: "What can Magma do that Sage can't do?"

2009-06-11 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Franco Saliola wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Jerome > Lefebvre wrote: >> >>> Can you elaborate on this? What do you mean by 'nicely wraps'? I wrote the >>> ClassFunction class that wraps GAP's ClassFunctio

[sage-devel] Re: "What can Magma do that Sage can't do?"

2009-06-11 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Jerome Lefebvre wrote: > >> Can you elaborate on this? What do you mean by 'nicely wraps'? I wrote the >> ClassFunction class that wraps GAP's ClassFunction command, but I'd like to >> know what more could/should be done. I am not a GAP expert so the code >> would

[sage-devel] Re: "What can Magma do that Sage can't do?"

2009-06-11 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:47 AM, William Stein wrote: > XIII. Representation Theory > >   * Characters of finite groups; GAP has this, of course, but I don't >     think Sage nicely wraps it. > > PROJECT: Wrap more of GAP's functionality, in particular characters of > finite groups. Can you elabo

[sage-devel] Re: Some Sage Lectures/Worksheets

2009-06-11 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > Hi Franco, > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Franco Saliola wrote: > > > >> All the sessions were very hands-on: each session began with a >> very short presentation and then the students worked on the

[sage-devel] Some Sage Lectures/Worksheets

2009-06-11 Thread Franco Saliola
Dear sage-devel, >From 25 May to 3 June, I gave a series of lectures (18 hours) on Sage at the University of Siena aimed at upper level undergraduates, graduate students and interested professors. I created a bunch of worksheets for these lessons, and thought that maybe some of you might find the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mike Hansen wrote: > > Hello, > > Sage 4.0.rc1 has been released.  This should hopefully take care of > the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac.  The tarball can be > found at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc1.tar > > and a co

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.0.rc0 - division bug on second and subsequent evaluation of cell?

2009-05-22 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: > > On 22 May 2009, at 16:07, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> On May 22, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Kevin Horton wrote: >> >>> I am using sage-4.0.rc0 on 32 bit ubuntu 8.10. >>> >>> I have discovered a very strange interaction between the >>> "Integer=int"

[sage-devel] Re: Wiki translation?

2009-05-22 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:00 AM, ahmet alper parker wrote: > > If not any exists or poor, I can contribute in the Turkish translation > too... If there is a standard way of doing that, it would be much > easier for other languages as well... You can find more information regarding translations o

[sage-devel] Re: Wiki translation?

2009-05-22 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Maurizio wrote: > > Hi all, > > For some strange reason, I fell into the SAGE-intro-Italian wiki page. > I am Italian, and I can see that translation has been done with an > automatic translator (something like babelfish or google translate), > and looks a bit em

[sage-devel] Re: 'report bug' link on sagemath.org?

2009-05-18 Thread Franco Saliola
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On May 18, 2:50 pm, mabshoff wrote: >> Just put in a link to the wiki to a new page called >> >>    http://wiki.sagemath.org/support/ReportingBugs > > ok, sounds good .. done That's perfect. Franco -- --~--~-~--~~

[sage-devel] 'report bug' link on sagemath.org?

2009-05-18 Thread Franco Saliola
I received an email from a new user with the following postscript. > P.S. Sorry for contacting you directly, I didn't find a link to report bugs > on the sagemath homepage. Perhaps we should add a 'report bug' link on sagemath.org? Franco -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~--

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009-05-18 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > I have put sage.math, 32 and 64 bit MacIntel, the sources as well as > the upgrade bits into > >   http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/ On 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10, exactly one doctest failure. sage -t "devel/sage/sage

[sage-devel] Re: Clarification of Sage and GPL

2009-05-06 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Brian Granger wrote: > > Brian, > >> A sage worksheet is no more a derived work of Sage than a jpeg would >> be a derived work of Photoshop/GIMP or a .doc file would be a derived >> work of MS Office or OpenOffice. > > I disagree.  A jpeg or .doc file is not source

[sage-devel] Re: JavaScript Graph editor

2009-04-30 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Rado wrote: > > In the maple 13 thread, someone mentioned graph editor done in java > script that can be added to SAGE for interactive playing around with > small graphs. Since I recently came across the port of Processing to > JavaScript ( http://processingjs.org

[sage-devel] Re: Maple 13

2009-04-29 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:10 AM, William Stein wrote: > > Hi, > > Maple 13 was released today, I think.  The "new features" page is here: I wonder if they fixed the 'numbpart' function. This would affect my most favourite sequence in the OEIS: http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A11

[sage-devel] Re: Lazy Infinite Power Series

2009-03-31 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 6:36 AM, Henryk Trappmann wrote: > >> >> Ok, here is a first shot that has 100% coverage (except dumps): >> http://github.com/bo198214/hyperops/raw/ >> 09e1da3372d7b431cdf557ffe164df9f91c08e68/formal_powerseries.py >>

[sage-devel] Re: Lazy Infinite Power Series

2009-03-31 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Henryk Trappmann wrote: > > I reached 90% coverage and have some more questions: > > 1. What is pickling? Currently I get the following message if I try > dumps: > PicklingError: Can't pickle : > attribute lookup __main__.FormalPowerSeries failed I would guess th

[sage-devel] Re: "less than" not transitive

2009-03-13 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello Nils, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:03 PM, N. Bruin wrote: > It really bothers me that "less than" comparisons are allowed without > transitivity. It seems that this bothered Guido as well: Python's universal comparison function is no longer universal in Python 3.0. In python-2.5 (current S

[sage-devel] Re: tab completion and function aliases cluttering the namespace

2009-02-12 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Simon King wrote: > >> An alternative idea: >>  FOO.X  -->  all attributes starting with X >>  FOO.X (press TAB twice) --> all attributes containing X >> >> Perhaps this is easier to implement. > > I actual

[sage-devel] Re: tab completion and function aliases cluttering the namespace

2009-02-09 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:34 PM, Simon King wrote: > >> Yes! >> I could imagine: >>  1. FOO.X searches for attributes that start with X (current >> behaviour) >>  2. FOO.X searches for attributes that *contain* X (new >> feature) +1! For ex

[sage-devel] QQ[sqrt(2)](sqrt(2))?

2009-01-26 Thread Franco Saliola
Here is a bug: one should be able to coerce the element that created the number field into the number field: sage: R = QQ[sqrt(2)] sage: R(sqrt(2)) Traceback ... TypeError: I came across this while playing around: I was trying to build a number field containing sqrt(2), sqrt

[sage-devel] Re: firefox and trac

2009-01-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Craig Citro wrote: > Here's what it does: once these are set up, just type "t 1000" into > the address bar to go immediately to trac ticket #1000, and type "trac > foo" to search trac for foo. You can achieve this with a "keyword search" in Firefox, which is an

[sage-devel] Re: sage/sets/primes.py -- Petition to remove old code

2009-01-24 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Nick Alexander wrote: > > > On 23-Jan-09, at 7:33 AM, William Stein wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Robert Miller >> wrote: >>> I've used it several times and see no reason at all to remove it. >>> >>> Redundancy is one reason I can thin

[sage-devel] Re: sage/sets/primes.py -- Petition to remove old code

2009-01-24 Thread Franco Saliola
I tried doing the following: sage: p = Primes() sage: p?? and it hangs. So after 4-5 seconds I hit Ctrl-C, at which point it shows me what I want. But then I tried again and let it sit for longer. It started using 100% of my CPU. After 30s or so, I hit Ctrl-C and it gave me a Traceback. See bel

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: CombinatorialAlgebra

2009-01-22 Thread Franco Saliola
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM, William Stein wrote: > Here's why Sage doesn't use properties much: > > (1) They were in Python yet when I started Sage. > > (2) They *really* suck when it comes to interactive introspection, > e.g., try > sage: R.root_lattice? > above and instead of

[sage-devel] Writing a Sage Days funding proposal

2009-01-20 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello, I am thinking about submitting a proposal for a Sage Days conference to a mathematics research center, and I noticed a wiki page of advice for future hosts. So it got me wondering whether there is any resource offering advice to proposal writers (things that worked, things that didn't work

[sage-devel] Re: embed Sage worksheets into PDFs?

2009-01-02 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Rob Beezer wrote: > The pdftk route worked fine for me. I'll add that KPDF (KDE's pdf > viewer) falls into the "scant support" category. Not much of a > surprise there. Okular, the KDE-4 pdf viewer, has (some) support for attached files, but it doesn't seem to

[sage-devel] genetic programming evolution of the Mona Lisa

2008-12-08 Thread Franco Saliola
I think it would be cool if Sage could do this: http://rogeralsing.com/2008/12/07/genetic-programming-evolution-of-mona-lisa/ Several of the comments on the site are requesting the source code (I particularly liked: "source code or it didn't happen"). Franco -- --~--~-~--~~--

[sage-devel] name space pollution

2008-11-30 Thread Franco Saliola
Michael Abshoff wrote in the comments to trac ticket #4653: > one issue that might be worth considering now before merging is > "name space pollution", i.e. there was some discussion at SD 11 > that it would be better to have most of the functionality of certain > packages like quadratic forms no

[sage-devel] Re: symbolic summation interface

2008-11-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I plan to start implementing a user interface to symbolic summation > soon and I want to get some opinions on how this interface should be. > > The most natural construct for summation, either of a list or symbol

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha3 released

2008-11-06 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello David, >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha3 released

2008-11-06 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello David, On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With amd64 intrepid ibex, it builds fine but sage -testall > seems to have the same locking-up issues as with the alpha2 version. I'm too am using amd64 intrepid ibex and having the same issues. The followin

[sage-devel] Re: calling symbolic expressions, was: Why Sage needs var(...) commands unlike Mathematica?

2008-11-06 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 5-Nov-08, at 8:55 PM, Robert Dodier wrote: > >> >> William Stein wrote: >> >>> Would you consider this weird if you read it in a paper, or >>> would you know how to interpret it? >>> >>> "Let $f = x^3 + x + 1$ and

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.alpha2 released

2008-11-05 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various > places, so I rebuilt > Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems > the download went okay. > > After the rebuild, the same

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 15

2008-10-30 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:53 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Perhaps it might be a good idea to organize a bug day with more >> advanced notice? > > I also announ

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 15

2008-10-30 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:55 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like every Thursday will be bugday this quarter since that > seems to be William's preferred day :) Ok, cool. Franco -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to s

[sage-devel] Re: Notebook dev problems

2008-10-30 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sonium wrote: >> Gears is an browser extension at the client side. Therefore I have to >> check first if it is installed, store the result and then display the >> "create shortcut" link if necessary. The problem is that I

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 15

2008-10-30 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:23 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a reminder that Sage Bug Day 15 will be tomorrow, > Thursday, October 30. See you there: Perhaps it might be a good idea to organize a bug day with more advanced notice? I think that it might help to know in adv

[sage-devel] Re: Italian translation of SAGE tutorial

2008-10-02 Thread Franco Saliola
Ciao Cristian, On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:12 PM, CristianCantoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm starting to translate the Sage tutorial in italian (tut.tex). > Everybody interested in is invited to give a hand and write here to > coordinate ourselves and discuss (if you have questions, ask!). I

[sage-devel] Re: SD10 Accomodation Again

2008-09-17 Thread Franco Saliola
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Bad news for the accomodation in Nancy: > > I called the Youth Hostel, and they do not have enough room for the > period of the SD10: a jazz festival and several other events are > happening in the same pe

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.2 sources released

2008-05-25 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello Michael, > > Hi Franco, > >> >> Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questio

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.2 sources released

2008-05-25 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello Michael, Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into Ubuntu to answer your other questions). On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OS 2: Mac OS X 10.4. >> >> "sage -upgrade" from a compiled (not binary) sage-3.0.1 didn't work: >> >>

  1   2   >