[sage-devel] Re: Another Solaris NTL problem

2008-06-05 Thread Francois
vec_xdouble.o xdouble.o G_LLL_FP.o G_LLL_QP.o G_LLL_XD.o G_LLL_RR.o vec_ulong.o vec_vec_ulong.o -L/export/ home0/francois/sage-3.0.2/local/lib -lgmp Undefined first referenced symbol in file main/opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc

[sage-devel] Re: Another Solaris NTL problem

2008-06-05 Thread Francois
On Jun 6, 2:03 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 5, 11:07 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess it happens because the makefile is full of direct calls > > to make rather than something like $MAKE. So even if you > > started with

[sage-devel] Re: Another Solaris NTL problem

2008-06-05 Thread Francois
independent. Feel free to educate me! Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group

[sage-devel] Re: Another Solaris NTL problem

2008-06-05 Thread Francois
hopefully someone has some idea how > to fix!!! > I fess up, that's one of my bits. I presume it is a GNU-ism but I am not sure why it wouldn't work with gmake. Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegr

[sage-devel] Re: Problems building Sage 3.0.2 on Solaris 10 - NTL issue

2008-06-04 Thread Francois
> Spot on Michael. gcc config is given at the beginning of the compilation and says: --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld OK back to square one to put together a better patch. It's at time like this that you start wishing everything was auto/lib-tooled. Cheers, Francois --~--~--

[sage-devel] Re: Problems building Sage 3.0.2 on Solaris 10 - NTL issue

2008-06-04 Thread Francois
On Jun 5, 1:10 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 4, 2:56 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > Hi Francois, > > > It looks like gmp_aux.h is generated during "make setup3" which is > > comp

[sage-devel] Re: Problems building Sage 3.0.2 on Solaris 10 - NTL issue

2008-06-04 Thread Francois
/ > build/ntl-5.4.2.p3/src/src' > Error creating ntl shared library. > > real0m1.459s > user0m1.035s > sys 0m0.200s > sage: An error occurred while installing ntl-5.4.2.p3 > Please email sage-devel http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > explaining the pr

[sage-devel] Re: Does the '.spkg' format just cause more problems than it solves?

2008-05-17 Thread Francois
n I was working with a mainly "monolithic" sage on Gentoo that's pretty much what I was doing. I even wrote a set of commands to automate it as much as possible. I don't know if cpio would handle tar.bz2 in which case it probably would be a better way. Francois --~--~

[sage-devel] Re: Questions about various spkgs

2008-05-08 Thread Francois
On May 8, 9:46 pm, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Francois a écrit : > > > On May 8, 12:25 pm, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'm working on getting several of the SAGE dependencies not already in > >> Debian m

[sage-devel] Re: http://wiki.sagemath.org/ seems broken

2008-05-07 Thread Francois
member. My university is behind a firewall and show only one IP to the outside world so it may be that I am not the only person interested in sage there and we are visiting the wiki too close together. Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to s

[sage-devel] Re: Questions about various spkgs

2008-05-07 Thread Francois
ice as I wouldn't have to get sage sage's linbox spkg just for linbox_wrap. Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options,

[sage-devel] Re: Debian package build failure for gfan with 3.0.1alpha1

2008-05-02 Thread Francois
ems very, very odd. Any > chance you could try building a vanilla gfan? > > Let me think about this some more, maybe I can come up with something. > I got it! -IGMPRATIONAL should be -DGMPRATIONAL Do not know where that came from in your package. Francois --~--~-~--~~--

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: sloppy mult and div in quaddouble?

2008-05-02 Thread Francois
I decided to go ahead and open a ticket for it with a patch for spkg- install. I noticed that the CXXFLAGS needed a bit of spring cleaning as well. The ticket is #3079. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubsc

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: sloppy mult and div in quaddouble?

2008-05-01 Thread Francois
On May 2, 12:51 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > These are some comments from Paul Zimmerman about QuadDouble. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:41 AM > Subject: Re: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: sl

[sage-devel] Re: sloppy mult and div in quaddouble?

2008-04-29 Thread Francois
ot;William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:46 AM, mabshoff > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 29, 10:33 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Francois, >

[sage-devel] Re: sloppy mult and div in quaddouble?

2008-04-29 Thread Francois
On Apr 29, 12:16 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Apr 29, 1:54 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 29, 11:33 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Francois, > > > Hi Michael, > > > The latest upstream

[sage-devel] Re: sloppy mult and div in quaddouble?

2008-04-28 Thread Francois
On Apr 29, 11:33 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Apr 28, 2:32 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > In my long task of getting sage on Gentoo I > > inspect spkg. So today I was creating an ebuild > > for q

[sage-devel] sloppy mult and div in quaddouble?

2008-04-28 Thread Francois
In my long task of getting sage on Gentoo I inspect spkg. So today I was creating an ebuild for quaddouble and looked at the config options available and the one used by sage and I see this: --enable-ieee-add use addition that satisfies IEEE-style error bound inst

[sage-devel] Re: typo in linbox spkg-install

2008-04-26 Thread Francois
Sorry You answered me while I was posting further comment. I don't have an account on the bug tracker. Francois On Apr 27, 4:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Apr 27, 6:32 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Francois, > > >

[sage-devel] Re: typo in linbox spkg-install

2008-04-26 Thread Francois
Furthermore, looking at the patches included I found that the commentator.C file is already patched, i.e. the file shipped in the spkg is not the upstream file but the file from the patch folder. Cheers, Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send

[sage-devel] typo in linbox spkg-install

2008-04-26 Thread Francois
Just reviewing what options linbox is compiled with for sage, well I was really looking at whether optimizations are enabled. In theory they are, except on Sun: if [ $UNAME = "SunOS" ]; then OPT="--enable-optimization=false" echo "Building on SunOS" else OPT="--enable-optimization" fi Of

[sage-devel] Re: Compile Error

2008-04-20 Thread Francois
On Apr 21, 11:53 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yep, same-ish here: not too old laptop, new Fedora, gcc4.3.0 et al. > > If there's anything else helpful let me know and I'll post it. > > Is it possible for you

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.3.rc3 released

2008-03-09 Thread Francois
Since they are still in that rc I should mention a couple of typos that I spotted in two spkg. In linbox in the spkg-install file on line 41 we have an interesting reference to ${SAGE_LCOAL}. In sage-2.10.3.rc3 in the top setup.py at line 430 we have: define_macros = [('GSL_DISABLE_DEPRECAED','1')

[sage-devel] Re: gentoo ebuild updated to 2.10.1

2008-02-04 Thread Francois
On Feb 4, 5:44 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2:55 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 4, 12:25 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Francois, > > > > It doesn't use the new mechan

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.1 released

2008-02-03 Thread Francois
On Feb 4, 5:45 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Feb 4, 12:35 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi Nils, > > > > > > I suspect that attaching a 13MB install.log is not the right method of >

[sage-devel] Re: gentoo ebuild updated to 2.10.1

2008-02-03 Thread Francois
On Feb 4, 12:25 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't use the new mechanism for using system atlas. > After thinking long and hard about it, I initially decided to > use it only to back off once I understood the mechanism. > So here is what I think is wr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.1 released

2008-02-03 Thread Francois
Hi, On Feb 4, 12:25 pm, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried a "sage --upgrade" from a clean, relocated install of sage > 2.10. The install seems to succeed, but running sage leads to: > > -- > | SAGE Version 2.10.1, R

[sage-devel] gentoo ebuild updated to 2.10.1

2008-02-03 Thread Francois
Hi all, I updated the ebuild in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201321 for sage-2.10.1. A few things to mention: -Cleaned and tidying up a little bit. -bumped dependencies to put them in line with sage. -Added a further notice to the maxima warning. -Added a notice on licenses as sage itse

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-22 Thread Francois
Hi Williams, On Jan 22, 8:52 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 21, 2008 11:36 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 22, 8:04 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: >

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-21 Thread Francois
ompiled by gfortran and the other by g95. Cheers, Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: rpm's, deb, and ebuilds,

2008-01-21 Thread Francois
ique" I am writing this on would not appreciate very much the copying over. Furthermore being able to do this, means that I can start touching python packages in sage without having to do everyone of them at once. Cheers, Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To po

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-21 Thread Francois
Hi Micheal, On Jan 22, 10:40 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 21, 1:02 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 21, 12:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > >

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-21 Thread Francois
On Jan 21, 8:51 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 21, 8:48 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 21, 12:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > LICENSE="GPL-2" > > > > shou

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-20 Thread Francois
unless there are exceptions attached. I am not sure of the reasoning behind this. Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, vis

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE in RPM form

2008-01-20 Thread Francois
Congratulations! Was my last message to you of any use? Cheers, Francois On Jan 20, 5:46 am, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I've posted here before, I have been working on packaging up SAGE > into an RPM form. Well, I am happy to say that I finally have > some

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-20 Thread Francois
On Jan 21, 12:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 21, 12:15 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > this is to point people interested in testing things on Gentoo towards > > the ebuild I just posted i

[sage-devel] sage 2.10 experimental ebuild for Gentoo

2008-01-20 Thread Francois
, the maxima version of course as well as one test in calculus.py, one in combinat.py (if my memory serves me right) and an other one that escape me. Cheers, Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: Anyone knows about any regression in gmp-4.2.2?

2008-01-12 Thread Francois
On Jan 9, 7:40 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 8, 11:55 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 10:00 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The > default > lisp for maxima here is the "Steel Bank

[sage-devel] Re: Anyone knows about any regression in gmp-4.2.2?

2008-01-08 Thread Francois
On Jan 9, 10:00 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 8, 9:55 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 9, 8:58 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > dortmund.de> wrote: > > > > Ok, we would certainly welc

[sage-devel] Re: Anyone knows about any regression in gmp-4.2.2?

2008-01-08 Thread Francois
On Jan 9, 8:58 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > > Ok, we would certainly welcome any kind of participation from the > Gentoo community. > Hopefully some support may be drummed there, I myself may be soon claimed by a non-academic real-life that could put me on hiatus. > >

[sage-devel] Re: Anyone knows about any regression in gmp-4.2.2?

2008-01-08 Thread Francois
On Jan 9, 8:14 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 8, 7:40 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't think the behavior of Maxima is affected by lisp. What version > of Maxima do you run on your system? There is at l

[sage-devel] Re: Anyone knows about any regression in gmp-4.2.2?

2008-01-08 Thread Francois
On Jan 8, 11:55 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 8, 10:00 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Hi Francois, > > > > > In my efforts to get sage in Gentoo I came on something that looks > > like

[sage-devel] Anyone knows about any regression in gmp-4.2.2?

2008-01-08 Thread Francois
Hi, In my efforts to get sage in Gentoo I came on something that looks like a problem in gmp 4.2.2. On Gentoo gmp 4.2.2 is marked stable and is part of the system (needed by gcc). On the ground that the only patch relevant to me was the new fast gcd code and that it was a performance patch and no

[sage-devel] Re: Wiris -- something like the Sage notebook sort of

2008-01-08 Thread Francois
On Jan 8, 8:50 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 11:42 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 8, 8:22 pm, "Fernando Perez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 8, 2008 12:13 AM, F

[sage-devel] Re: Wiris -- something like the Sage notebook sort of

2008-01-07 Thread Francois
On Jan 8, 8:22 pm, "Fernando Perez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 12:13 AM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, it worked for me under Ubuntu Gutsy with firefox... > Strange it definitely just stay blank for me. I am using the plugin fr

[sage-devel] Re: Wiris -- something like the Sage notebook sort of

2008-01-07 Thread Francois
On Jan 8, 7:00 pm, "Ted Kosan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William wrote: > > It would be good for you to take a look at what Wiris does if you are > > interested in the Sage notebook. > > Here is a direct link to the demo applet. Just click the link, wait a > bit for the applet to load, and t

[sage-devel] Re: Do we really build pySQLite within sage-2.9.1.1?

2008-01-01 Thread Francois
ith the current deps file sqlite is built twice, or is there a safety against that? Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, vis

[sage-devel] Do we really build pySQLite within sage-2.9.1.1?

2008-01-01 Thread Francois
I was looking at the deps file and stumble across this: $(INST)/$(PYSQLITE): $(INST)/$(PYTHON) $(INST)/$(SQLITE) $(SAGE_SPKG) $(SQLITE) 2>&1 Given that there is a pysqlite spkg I assume that must be a mistake. Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To

[sage-devel] Re: Best wishes

2007-12-31 Thread Francois
me in New Zealand. But I extend my best wishes to people in other time zone not yet in 2008! Cheers, Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more

[sage-devel] Re: Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-30 Thread Francois
On Dec 31, 1:11 pm, "Ted Kosan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ondrej wrote: > > Nice thing about this is that there is no database, nothing. Just > > plain files, that > > can be fixed by hand. > > > How would portage improve this? > > Portage is just editable text files too. I do not have any e

[sage-devel] Re: Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-30 Thread Francois
ich is a bit too Gentoo-centric to be of any real benefit to anyone else. More discipline in the packaging is probably what is most needed at the moment. And you can package stuff as badly in ebuilds than you can in spkgs so that wouldn't really e

[sage-devel] Re: problem compiling sage (from at least 2.8.15 to 2.9.1.1)

2007-12-28 Thread Francois
le my lattice QCD code correctly anyway I will remove it and try again. I am busy for the next few hours so I will do that a bit latter. Thanks for looking, Francois --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from

[sage-devel] problem compiling sage (from at least 2.8.15 to 2.9.1.1)

2007-12-28 Thread Francois
. Here is the last message: sage: Building and installing modified SAGE library files. Installing c_lib gcc -o src/convert.os -c -O2 -g -fPIC -I/home/francois/Work/Gentoo/ sage-2.9.1.1/local/include -I/home/francois/Work/Gentoo/sage-2.9.1.1/local/include/python2.5 -I/ home/francois/Work/Gentoo/sage

<    2   3   4   5   6   7