Re: [sage-devel] Symbolic Variables for Internal Useg

say it is a bug, but fixing it would require to refactor a lot of code in handling assumptions. The only short-term workaround i see is to use different symbols. Ciao, Thierry > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" g

Re: [sage-devel] Symbolic Variables for Internal Useg

, since it benefits to more users (in particular it is well indexed by search engines). Ciao, Thierry > > Thanks in advance! :) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Optional and experimental packages

uld remove it. Perhaps should we simply remove the pseudo-packages whose type is "pip" (since there is the "sage -pip install" command), that is: beautifulsoup biopython brian guppy mercurial mpi4py nibabel pybtex pyflakes sqlalchemy trac Ciao, Thierry -- You received this mess

Re: [sage-devel] hosting an "online" combinatorics package using sage?

works with your script. Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. &g

Re: [sage-devel] is patchbot.sagemath.org down?

Thanks for reporting, i restarted the services, seems OK now. Thierry On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:21:59AM -0700, mmarco wrote: > I get an Internal Server Error when I try to access the patchbot. In > particular, I can't see patchbot reports for any ticket. > > To make sure

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: three.js as the default 3d viewer in Sage

e as well with jsmol, instead of running (java) jmol. Also, the java issue is now fixed, which also means that jmol is still maintained. Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and sto

Re: [sage-devel] Bug or unfortunate feature?

hat > can't be correctly solved using a CAS, and have to be solved by hand. I would say that there is a bug in the 'default' algorithm. Note that changing the algorithm leads to: sage: A.echelon_form(algorithm='partial_pivoting') [ 1 0 -23/3 -2/3*

[sage-devel] The opportunity of Python 3 migration

one could take the opportunity, from Python 3 becoming the default, to fix all other inconsistencies of Sage, that are kept forever in the name of backward-compatibility. This would imply not making Python 3 the default too early, let is not miss this opportunity ! Ciao, Thierry -- You receiv

Re: [sage-devel] Education: hints to manual integration

ter to propose an option "hint=False" to the existing integrate generic function (to be discussed, i do not have strong opinion on that). Ciao, Thierry > - In any case, which would be the right way to handle different > representations deppending on the environments? I assume tha

Re: [sage-devel] numerical_approx for polynomials

each coefficients. Ciao, Thierry On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:38:45AM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > Dear devs, > > Is it fine if I implement numerical_approx on polynomials by calling > it recursively on coefficients? For example, we would have > > sage: x = pol

Re: [sage-devel] How would you like your parallel linear algebra ?

processors (4 threads / cpu with XeonPhi)). Thierry Le 22/03/2019 à 11:14, Clement Pernet a écrit : > Hi, > > In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27444 we are exposing the parallel > versions (using OpenMP) of fflas-ffpack routines used in SageMath. This > is only about multicore parall

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

Hi, i am not sure how it is related, but one could imagine to keep an history of Sage documentations of all official releases, with urls like doc.sagemath.org/8.6 and doc.sagemath.org/latest pointing to the current release. Ciao, Thierry On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:27:43PM +0100, Samuel

Re: [sage-devel] Is there a way to force Sage to use system's openblas ?

in and help with... Perhaps could you provide a task ticket, plus some pointers to readable documentation, howtos, etc. Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-devel] Poll: set online=True as the default for threejs viewer

Sage already differs from the command line and the notebook (e.g. jmol vs jsmol), we could do the same for mybinder and friends. Ciao, THierry On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:35:23AM +1300, François Bissey wrote: > I will formally vote for “True”. > > However I think the default should be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: python3 status report

Hi, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2019-02-11 11:12, David Coudert wrote: > > > > > > Le mardi 29 janvier 2019 23:19:12 UTC+1, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) > > a écrit : [...] > > > > That said, regarding the .e

Re: [sage-devel] sage crash report

hose are stored on that directory. If you have such worksheets, do that instead: To keep a backup of the worksheets: sudo cp -a /home/a/.sage/ /home/a/.sage.save To change ownerchip of the directory: sudo chown -R ${USER}:${USER} /home/a/.sage/ Ciao, Thierry > > Then try

Re: [sage-devel] Re: python3 status report

By having a view, you will save a lot of time and memory, and have the benefit that it will follow the graph's mutations. Ciao, Thierry > David. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group

Re: [sage-devel] spkgs dependencies graph

the wheel, and find a bullet-proof existing mainstream packaging system that fits our needs, see: https://wiki.sagemath.org/days77/packaging#SageMath_as_a_distribution.2C_candidates_to_replace_the_.60spkg-install.60_system Ciao, Thierry > > > > Le 29/01/2019 à 19:44, Dima Pasechni

Re: [sage-devel] documentation of SageMath (Python) packages

e some dedicated "clever": sage -install blah that parses blah to see whether it is an spkg name, it has to pip install it, to git clone it and search for some Makefile, and so on, and with nicest defaults as possible (like installing the doc if it exists). Ciao, Thierry > If the answe

Re: [sage-devel] Upcoming Debian freeze

Hi, On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:38:40PM +0100, E. Madison Bray wrote: > On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote: > > > > On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-de

Re: [sage-devel] Upcoming Debian freeze

version 2.2 [1], so should #26326 be set as blocker ? I noticed that sagemath disapeared from testing [2], is there a way we could help fixing that with 8.6 ? Ciao, Thierry [1] https://packages.debian.org/buster/python-networkx [2] https://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Bug in sage.sat.boolean_polynomials.solve() with CryptoMiniSat 5.0.1

`cryptominisat.py` > file which connects your SAT solver to SageMath, see > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26676. Needs review ! Ciao, Thierry > > Regards, Jörg. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Real algebraic varieties

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 5:37 PM Thierry > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > this question is related to the thread about Groebner bases. > > > > Are there some free-software implementations

[sage-devel] Real algebraic varieties

bases, but it is a Maple^TM package. The only thing i found within Sage is qepcad, but it is not powerful enough to return anything. Ciao, Thierry [1] https://www-polsys.lip6.fr/~safey/RAGLib/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel"

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS WITH SAGEMATH"

For sure, you can. Thanks ! t.d. Le 14/12/2018 à 02:09, Travis Scrimshaw a écrit : > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 1:28:09 AM UTC+10, William wrote: > > "COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS WITH SAGEMATH" is now in English and > published on paper by a traditional publisher. > http://

Re: [sage-devel] A Sage interface for FGb (Gröbner bases)

ly, the fact that is is neither free-software nor open-source made it lower on my todo list. I wonder whether it could be possible to kindly ask J.C. Faugere to free his code, especially since his work on this is founded by the (french) public service. Thanks a lot for the work ! Ciao, Thierry

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

1.1.1 LTS release) that it will take times since they want to check with lawyers that everything is correct. Ciao, Thierry > Cheers, > Nicolas > > [1] https://www.openssl.org/ > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 07:01:45AM -0700, Emmanuel Charpentie

Re: [sage-devel] Re: refresh the banner

e notebook() function should first see if they are old-style notebooks to export to ipynb (as "sage -n" does currently). Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] dot in sage ?

age does not provide graphviz, hence not the dot command. Hovever, there is the dot2tex optional package that allows Sage to use the graphviz you installed on your computer. You can grep Sage source code to see how it is used. Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] Should we include SDL in sage ?

e for SDL2 is pretty straightforward. However, writing an interface so that it can be used through Sage will require some work (unless you did that already). Ciao, Thierry > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" gro

Re: [sage-devel] snappy in Sage

d anyone reading this thread > about it :) I was thinking to include those in a future version of Sage Debian Live and the scripts in the computop docker could help me. However, it could be much nicer to have those packaged directly in Sage so that the packaging work is done only once for all si

Re: [sage-devel] snappy in Sage

sage -pip install hg+https://bitbucket.org/t3m/snappy Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sag

[sage-devel] License question (glucose-syrup)

try to convince them to release glucose-syrup under a true MIT license. Ciao, Thierry [1] http://www.labri.fr/perso/lsimon/glucose/ [2] https://www.lrde.epita.fr/wiki/PaInleSS -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To u

Re: [sage-devel] check dependencies

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 01:40:38PM +0100, dimp...@gmail.com wrote: [...] > IMHO we don't want such legacy things as standard... Agreed. But how should we deal with testing networkx ? Ciao, Thierry > > Dima > > -- > You received this message because you are subscrib

[sage-devel] check dependencies

ncies" (e.g. after a second | or whatever symbol), or should i hardcode some message within the spkg-check if it is not installed ? Would it make sense to make nose standard so that exporting SPKG_CHECK=yes does not breaks everything ? Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message becau

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Change (bug or feature?) in 3d plots illustrating the reference manual

s. If there's something about the > Tachyon plots that's inferior to the Jmol plots, or at least > noticeably different, we should fix that (for the HTML docs why not > use threejs by default across the board?) Just to avoid biased discussion, please note that java is only requi

Re: [sage-devel] sage --version not printing anything

I have two versions od sage on my Ubuntu 18-0 machine, both compiled from source (git downloaded).No problem I obtain SageMath version 8.3, Release Date: 2018-08-03 with the first one SageMath version 8.4.beta0, Release Date: 2018-08-05 >which sage /usr/local/bin/sage >ls -l /usr/local/bin/sage l

Re: [sage-devel] Dropping support for old-style .spkgs?

l case for still supporting .spkgs defeats the purpose of > dropping support. For the record, note that there is a wiki page that follows the migration, and that lists the old-style packages that are still of interest (polytopes_db_4d is one of them) https://wiki.sagemath.org/Classify%20old-style%20pa

Re: [sage-devel] Poll about adopting matplotlib2 style for Sage graphics

Hi, could you please provide some links showing the difference with the current hardcoded style, so that all of us could see without having to recompile the doc wrt the proposed branch ? Ciao, Thierry On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 05:38:09PM -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Th

[sage-devel] Allowing correct upstream acknowledgement by default ?

ludes having ``get_systems`` being functional and imported at startup. Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@g

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Phython Sage source code.

> > Do I need to build from scratch i.e. make distclean & make ? Not necessarilly, you should run ./configure before "make build". Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" gro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Names of objects in sage

trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22565 for a similar issue with polytopes and their backends. Maybe there could be a "short" option to get the short representation in the case where the representation can be made short wile providing the exact same object. Ciao, Thierry On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at

Re: [sage-devel] Names of objects in sage

r(1)" is heavier than "1", and i am not sure we want that. Ciao, Thierry > > > > By the way, there is already: > > > > sage: sage_input(PolynomialRing(GF(5), 'q')) > > GF(5)['q'] > > > > Thank you! I did not know

Re: [sage-devel] Names of objects in sage

be copy-pastable, but then how do you want to render simple things like QQbar(1) without being heavy ? By the way, there is already: sage: sage_input(PolynomialRing(GF(5), 'q')) GF(5)['q'] Ciao, Thierry On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 02:11:21PM -0700, Andrew wrote: > For s

Re: [sage-devel] random_element and randtest_element

andom_element overloaded hence less readable. If those four tests are interesting, we should just add them to the TEST section. Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] random_element and randtest_element

ot;corner cases" with good probability. > > I thought that some_elements() was meant for that: +1. Ciao, Thierry > > sage: R. = ZZ[] > sage: list(R.some_elements()) > [x, 0, 1, 1, x^2 + 2*x + 1, x^3, x^2 - 1, x^2 + 1, 2*x^2 + 2] > > Obviously, this some_elements()

Re: [sage-devel] Permanently import function

Hi, did you add something within $SAGE_ROOT/src/sage/all.py ? Ciao, Thierry On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 04:51:45AM -0700, Jupiter Crafter wrote: > Hey I have the following question, > I tried to install a few functions into the Sage/src Directory but however > they didn't show up in

Re: [sage-devel] optional package doctests badly broken

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:17:16PM +0100, John Cremona wrote: > On 11 May 2018 at 16:11, William Stein wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:37 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer > >> wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] optional package doctests badly broken

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:35:36PM +0100, John Cremona wrote: > On 10 May 2018 at 16:20, Thierry wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:41:39PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Probably because o

Re: [sage-devel] optional package doctests badly broken

ppen less often? Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages included. Ciao, Thierry > > Best > Vincent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] Integrating SageMath into existing Python install / Python compiling error

> update that? The unstable release of Debian has Sage version 8.1 : https://packages.debian.org/sid/sagemath It seems there is no backport of recent version of Sage in Debian stable yet, but it might appear in the future. Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subsc

Re: [sage-devel] Integrating SageMath into existing Python install / Python compiling error

have missed a part of the history: there *is* a Debian package for Sage, now in stable, see https://packages.debian.org/stretch/sagemath Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and st

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Internet access during tests

ns (I am doing > this in most tests anyway) > - clear the cache (I am doing that in some tests already to prevent > side-effects of tests) I am sorry to insist, but what is wrong with adding # optional -- internet on doctests that might connect to the internet ? Ciao, Thierr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Internet access during tests

On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 08:05:21AM +, Simon King wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On 2018-04-06, Thierry wrote: > >> 1. Is it really true that Sage currently does NOT block internet > >>access during doctests, i.e., has returned to the situation more > >>

Re: [sage-devel] Internet access during tests

> 2. Why has Sage returned to allowing internet access? > 3. Is there some way (say, by some environment variable) to actively >block all internet access while `sage -t` runs? sudo iptables -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT -o lo sudo iptables -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT -o 127.0.0.1

[sage-devel] openssl licensing

Hi, not sure whether there is a database access issue, but according to [1], there is no contributor to be found for relicensing openssl. That would be awesome. Ciao, Thierry [1] https://license.openssl.org/trying-to-find -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Move the automatic_names() feature into the Sage interpreter proper

e user use the automatic name "plop" in her worksheet and in a later version Sage adds "plop" into the global namspace ? Such features might look impressive for the 5 first minutes one is using Sage, but they are adding confusion and do not help understanding nor teaching in

Re: [sage-devel] Possible patchbot(s) problem ?

failing doctest. This will be fixed in the next beta release, see #24918 (imho, this patchblot lock is a sufficient condition to trigger an new beta, even with very few tickets merged). Ciao, Thierry > FWIW : > >- This is your routine vanilla upgrade to R (3.4.4 was released &g

Re: [sage-devel] SAGE 8.1 will not compile under Ubuntu 17.10: error installing giac-1.2.3.47.p0

I have an Ubuntu 17.10, and 8.2 beta 5 compiles without anay problems. May be I must say that I upraded from one version to another with git pull origin develop just issuing make after the git command. But I don't think this could hide some problem. Yours t.d. -- You received this message becaus

Re: [sage-devel] SAGE 8.1 will not compile under Ubuntu 17.10: error installing giac-1.2.3.47.p0

export SAGE_INSTALL_GCC='yes' before make. Ciao, Thierry > > > On 16/02/2018, at 10:37, Harald Helfgott wrote: > > > > First, here is the output of /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.2.0$ ldd cc1 > > > > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff8af5

Re: [sage-devel] Sage vs rstudio and system's R

warded: TODO, maybe not-needed" This would have saved me so many hours ! Also, i wonder how it is related to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22682 Ciao, Thierry [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sagemath.git/tree/debian/patches/dt-r-no-readline.patch >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage vs rstudio and system's R

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 10:32:27AM +1300, François Bissey wrote: > > On 7/02/2018, at 10:23, Thierry wrote: [...] > > I diffed with Debian's file, and apparently they added a '--no-readline' > > option to the call to R in $SAGE_ROOT/src/sage/interfaces/r.py and

Re: [sage-devel] Sage vs rstudio and system's R

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:37:20PM +0100, Thierry wrote: [...] > If on the other way, i try to let Sage use system's R by: > - replacing r spkg-install by "true" > - exporting RHOMES=/usr/lib/R/ in rpy2 spkg-install (instead of > $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/R) > > T

Re: [sage-devel] Sage vs rstudio and system's R

face that freezes on the first call to system's R), even a quick and dirty fix will by very satisfying on the short term. Since Debian's Sage use Debian's R, i am curious to see how they fixed this. Ciao, Thierry > François > > > On 7/02/2018, at 08:37, Thierry wrote: &

[sage-devel] Sage vs rstudio and system's R

s Sage. Do anyone have an idea on how to fix it ? I am locked with that issue for a while, and it will greatly help me in the release of the next SDL (there are also tons of issues with the migration jessie->stretch but i am close to having fixed them all). Ciao, Thierry [1] https://sagedebia

Re: [sage-devel] Bug in positivity test of a real expression

Hi, On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 10:24:55PM +, Simon King wrote: > Hi! > > I found this > > sage: val = SR(-5.68242325601396e-24) > sage: bool(val>0) > False > sage: bool(val<0) > True > sage: RR(val)>0 > False > sage: RR(val)<0 > T

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbots broken with 8.2.beta1

cket, those doctests should be run by healthy patchbot only. Ciao, Thierry > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbots broken with 8.2.beta1

Hi, On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:10:47PM +0100, Erik Bray wrote: > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: > > On 2017-12-24 17:07, Thierry wrote: > >> > >> It should stop. > > > > > > That's not a solution. If it just stops,

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbots broken with 8.2.beta1

On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 02:42:41PM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-23 12:41, Thierry wrote: > >that it > >would be a good thing to test against ticket 0 at each beta > > I believe that the patchbot does that indeed. It just tests it and goes > ahead testing oth

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbots broken with 8.2.beta1

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 11:34:12AM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-23 11:20, Thierry wrote: > >There is already a mechanism named "ticket 0": at every new beta release, > >the patchbots must succeed to build and doctest the new version correctly, > >

[sage-devel] latest version of notedown package not on the mirrors

Hi, i make a separate thread to be visible: the package notedown which has just been upgraded to version 1.5.1 is not on the mirrors, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24376 Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel"

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbots broken with 8.2.beta1

ht not have been uploaded on the mirrors or the mirrors are not synced yet) Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure in building Sage (problem with python2-2.7.14)

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:13:20PM +0100, Thierry wrote: [...] > perhaps python is a "dependent" of openssl spkg, not a "dependency", or > perhaps it is a "dependency" of some virtual openssl package that will be Damn, of course i meant the other way (pyt

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure in building Sage (problem with python2-2.7.14)

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Erik Bray wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2017-12-04 15:37, Thierry wrote: > >> > >> No, we have to be able to remove all the old stuff from the package. > > > > > > You sa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure in building Sage (problem with python2-2.7.14)

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:47:31PM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-04 15:37, Thierry wrote: > >No, we have to be able to remove all the old stuff from the package. > > You said "rebuilds the package and its dependencies" but you really mean > "uninstalls

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure in building Sage (problem with python2-2.7.14)

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:31:13PM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-04 15:23, Thierry wrote: > >A great improvement in > >the dev workflow would be to have a kind of "make clean " that > >rebuilds the package and its dependencies > > Doesn't &q

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure in building Sage (problem with python2-2.7.14)

make clean " that rebuilds the package and its dependencies, this will save a lot of recompilation time in such cases. Ciao, Thierry > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe f

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Issue with quick start

Le 29/11/2017 à 08:40, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > In French, we name that "les mathématiques"... ISTR that there are > serious etymological reasons. The US's "math" sounds like carelessness > (and the french "désinvolture" would be a better designation...). > > -- > Emmanuel Charpentier > W

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbot and its trust issues

result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 556, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: NOT FOUND Ciao, Thierry On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 08:46:07PM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote: &g

Re: [sage-devel] how to get patchbots to test a ticket ?

Hi, On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:00:27PM -0800, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > Re Trac#24240 : this ticket > updates freetype (standard package) to get R t have graphics capabilities. > > This ticket has been : > >- tested once by the Cygwin patchbot (w

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

; just refuses to display the answer (however, there is no message as to > why). This makes sense, the karma threshold to insert clickable links is 10. What is wrong, is that you did not get any message explaining the reason. Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subs

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

st from a different webbrowser ? Ciao, Thierry > On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 3:41:02 PM UTC, Thierry > (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:34:14AM -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > looks like a moderation process bug to me... > &

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

o karma threshold to be able to post. We did that when we were flooded by spammers, but we could mitigate those attacks, so currently, the only moderation is for newcomers that do their first post, nothing related to karma. Ciao, Thierry > On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 12:20:23 PM UTC, Erik

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

a draft is > being saved but never posted. Are you sure those are not stored in some cookie on your computer ? Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

n see, e.g. https://ask.sagemath.org/question/39269/launched-jmol-viewer-for-graphics3d-object-fails/?comment=39298#post-id-39298 The complete list can be seen at: https://ask.sagemath.org/users/23374/iguananaut/?sort=recent Please tell if something is missing. Ciao, Thierry > Is there a

Re: [sage-devel] sage: An error occurred while installing libgpg_error-1.6.p3

Hi, 4.7.2 is a very old version of Sage, libgpg is not part of the current release of Sage (8.0). Do you explicitely want to install that version ? Ciao, Thierry On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:10:48AM -0800, wh773326...@163.com wrote: > When I tried to make the sage-4.7.2 according the s

Re: [sage-devel] Why does the patchbot not test tickets that are determined to be "spkg" updates?

actually works very well in my testing so far, but getting the > functionality merged is taking some time as there are some difficult > prerequisites (e.g. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22509). Great initiative! Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] Why does the patchbot not test tickets that are determined to be "spkg" updates?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Thierry wrote: [...] > But, if we want to add an option to let the patchbot install a new package > proposed by some ticket, after testing that ticket, the patchbot will be > in a different state than before to test other tickets, in this situati

Re: [sage-devel] Why does the patchbot not test tickets that are determined to be "spkg" updates?

than before to test other tickets, in this situation, the patchbot will report possibly wrong false negative. So, at the end, we have an issue with our packaging system: there is no systematic way to uninstall a package. Ciao, Thierry > Thanks, > Erik > > -- > You receive

Re: [sage-devel] floor division for integer matrices

(exp) [e^3 e^3] [e^3 e^3] sage: exp(A) [1/2*e^6 + 1/2 1/2*e^6 - 1/2] [1/2*e^6 - 1/2 1/2*e^6 + 1/2] Ciao, Thierry On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:36:59PM -0700, Simon Brandhorst wrote: > sage: A = Matrix(ZZ,2,[3,3,3,3]) > sage: A > [3 3] > [3 3]

Re: [sage-devel] Use system R with sage?

at do not want to compile Sage's R but still be able to use the system's one from Sage. As of Sage 7.4, doctests pass, but perhaps they are not strong enough to show a possible blas/lapack conflict (before your email, i supposed that rpy2 just calls R which calls the blas/lapac

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: inclusion of OpenSSL in Sage

o rely on openssl (no https), we only rely on the computation of > > sha1 > > There you go for something crippled! https://shattered.io/ sha256 is also supported by python-hashlib compiled without openssl support, so we could/should easily move to using it in Sage "package mana

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: inclusion of OpenSSL in Sage

user-friendly, we are losing a lot of energy which could be spent in much more interesting parts of Sage (e.g. mathematics). Ciao, Thierry On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:08:51AM -0700, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > [ The first post started too fast... Sorry for the interruption ! ] > >

Re: [sage-devel] help needed with git schlamassel

Hi, does 'git trac push --force' work ? Ciao, Thierry On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:19:09PM -0700, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > Dear git gurus, > > I accidentally pushed a merge to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22921. > Locally, I can "

Re: [sage-devel] proposal: downgrade libtheora to experimental package

'pip' type, see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sage-devel/oDJS-7R0qzE Ciao, Thierry On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:30:38AM -0700, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > fails on semi-current gentoo: > > [libtheora-1.1.1] libtool: link: gcc -Wall -Wno-parentheses -O3 > -fforce-ad

Re: [sage-devel] Install numba from Anaconda into Sage

? By the way, a good place to ask such questions is: https://ask.sagemath.org/ Ciao, Thierry On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 01:25:37AM -0700, Raul Ramirez wrote: > I am not sure if this posted so I am trying again, > > I am trying to parallelize the function `is_interval()`. I h

Re: [sage-devel] bug in cos ?!

Hi, this might be related to: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20752 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20742 (and it is doctested). Ciao, Thierry On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 03:17:27PM -0400, Bruno Le Floch wrote: > Hello, > > In fact, it seems that in Sage 7.2, cos((p/q)*pi) gets re

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Huma

How does raw "exec" behaves with your large file ? sage: with open('your_file.txt') as f: : exec(preparse(f.read())) Ciao, Thierry On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:01:57PM +, Simon King wrote: > On 2017-09-16, Thierry wrote: > > Do you have it in the Pytho

[sage-devel] Huma

Do you have it in the Python/Sage format ? On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 10:37:36AM +, Simon King wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On 2017-09-16, Thierry wrote: > > could you please give us access to the file (or a sample of it), so that > > we understand how it looke like ? >

Re: [sage-devel] Faster way to load python code

Hi Simon, could you please give us access to the file (or a sample of it), so that we understand how it looke like ? Ciao, Thierry On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 09:13:38AM +, Simon King wrote: > Hi! > > I have a large file (2.7*10^6 lines, 204.5*10^6 bytes) of code > that defines a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >