On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:33:24 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
I've spent some time looking at hashdist which is probably the closest to
what we need, but I don't think its the way to go for us right now. First,
Sage depends on the LD_LIBRARY_PATH hack on too many places. Before that is
On Thursday, May 5, 2011 3:42:59 AM UTC+2, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:51 AM, dagss d.s.se...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of thought
since I decided to drop Sage as my scientific Python distribution a year
ago
://github.com/dagss/scidist/blob/master/ideas.rst
(I may be interested in putting in work in this direction...)
But of course, Gentoo has a scientific community etc. etc. which Nix sort of
lacks, so I can definitely see Gentoo making more sense for you.
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
--
To post
On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:51:10 AM UTC+2, Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Dag,
On Wed, 4 May 2011 00:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
dagss d.s.se...@astro.uio.no wrote:
I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of
thought since I decided to drop Sage as my scientific Python
On Nov 23, 3:54 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 11/22/10 1:48 PM, Ethan Van Andel wrote:
In my development, I'm attempting to parallelize some code. However,
the bottleneck is a call to numpy.linalg.lapack_lite.zgesv, that is
the point where numpy calls LAPACK to
On Nov 23, 3:25 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder why zgesv comes here from lapack_lite rather than from Atlas,
which might have much faster zgesv.
Is it a feature (or a bug) of Sage configuration of Numpy?
Or in fact it does come come Atlas?
It's just a strange feature of
On Nov 23, 4:22 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 11/23/10 7:19 AM, dagss wrote:
On Nov 23, 3:54 am, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 11/22/10 1:48 PM, Ethan Van Andel wrote:
In my development, I'm attempting to parallelize some code. However
On Oct 7, 10:39 pm, Francois Maltey fmal...@nerim.fr wrote:
Hello,
I play with expressions, and transform sin(x) to (exp(i*x)-exp(-i*x))/2.
So I use a lot of test as
var ('x')
y = cos(x) # or any other expression
op = y.operator # so op == cos
if op == cos : ... # this test is
On Aug 3, 5:52 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
6. TRANSPOSE/CONJUGATE
It seems that implementing this would just involve modifying the
__pos__(self) method for complexes, matrices and complex matrices, and
I think that both conjugating and transposing are common enough
On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Sage at EuroScipy:
Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk
given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned Sage
-- and there were over 30 talks. Perhaps there is no penetration at
On Apr 28, 10:15 pm, Pablo Angulo pablo.ang...@uam.es wrote:
Hello:
Tracking a weird bug I've discovered the following:
For a symbolic variable x and a numpy.float64 y, the code 'xy' evals
to a Symbolic expression, while 'yx' evals to a numpy.bool.
I'm afraid I'm stacked, as it is the
On Mar 27, 10:56 am, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:
I just stumbled over Gentoo prefix -- have any of you tried it out?
In short, it allows a Gentoo Linux system in a subdirectory, on Linux,
Mac, Windows/SUA, Solaris. Gentoo is thus awfully similar to the Sage
spkg system:
On Mar 27, 11:15 am, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:
No, I'm barely getting started. I hardly know my way around Gentoo, I
had no interest in it until I discovered Gentoo prefix. (I need to
distribute software on clusters, and I certainly don't have root
access to those! --
On Mar 2, 3:39 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
On May 18, 12:29 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Here at Sage Days 15, William Stein gave a presentation on the future
of Sage in which one of the issues was improved statistics support.
While we include statistics functionality vis R, rpy, and scipy.stats,
that functionality is not
On 16 Mai, 02:57, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have
some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release
a 0.6.1 sometime soon.
Is there a reason you are not using the cython-mode which ships
On May 6, 10:27 pm, Ralf Hemmecke r...@hemmecke.de wrote:
But if it comes to Ondrej's code, I think it is ridiculous if it were
forced to be under GPL. Just suppose Ondrej had mistyped his text so
that it looked like
---
from asge.all import x
print x**2
---
(Note it's asge not
On Mar 17, 10:40 am, Guan Guofeng ggp...@gmail.com wrote:
that's not the key
import numpy
x=numpy.arange(0,1,.05)
y=numpy.sin(x)
still can't work
Ahh right. NumPy is not compatible with the Sage number types. Either
specify %python at the top of the cell, or do
sage: import numpy
sage:
On Mar 13, 9:56 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
is there already an operator named %% (double-percent)?
Somewhere in Python or its relatives?
If not, we could have the best of both worlds. Just let act in Cython
% as the corresponding C operator, i.e. -1 % 5 ==
19 matches
Mail list logo
