Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade
2000. I've installed Sage on that several times before without
issue. But
Em, I'm puzzled by this too. It builds fine with the Sun compiler
kir...@t2:[~] $ /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc simple_complex.c
kir...@t2:[~] $ ./a.out
CYTHON_CCOMPLEX 1
but not with gcc.
kir...@t2:[~] $ gcc -Wall simple_complex.c
simple_complex.c: In function '__pyx_t_double_complex_from_parts':
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Em, I'm puzzled by this too. It builds fine with the Sun compiler
kir...@t2:[~] $ /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc simple_complex.c
kir...@t2:[~] $ ./a.out
CYTHON_CCOMPLEX 1
but not with gcc.
kir...@t2:[~] $ gcc -Wall simple_complex.c
simple_complex.c: In function
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Em, I'm puzzled by this too. It builds fine with the Sun compiler
kir...@t2:[~] $ /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc simple_complex.c
kir...@t2:[~] $ ./a.out
CYTHON_CCOMPLEX 1
but not with gcc.
I'll report this as a gcc bug, as that would seem the most likely reason.
Of course,
On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Em, I'm puzzled by this too. It builds fine with the Sun compiler
kir...@t2:[~] $ /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc simple_complex.c
kir...@t2:[~] $ ./a.out
CYTHON_CCOMPLEX 1
but not with gcc.
I'll report this as a gcc bug, as
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade 2000. I've
installed Sage on that several times before without issue. But this time I get
an error.
This is a bit annoying, as I really did believe that 4.3.1 would build on
Solaris 10 SPARC without any problems, after the
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade 2000.
I've installed Sage on that several times before without issue. But this
time I get an error.
This is a bit annoying, as I really did believe that 4.3.1 would build
on Solaris 10 SPARC without any
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
The build on 't2' has now failed at the same point. This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7932
I got exactly the same problem with my build attempt of Sage
4.3.1.alpha2 on t2.math.
--
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
The build on 't2' has now failed at the same point. This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7932
I got exactly the same problem with my build attempt of Sage
On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade
2000. I've installed Sage on that several times before without
issue. But this time I get an error.
This is a bit annoying, as I really did believe
On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-4.3.1.alpha2 in 32-bit mode on a Sun Blade
2000. I've installed Sage on that several times before without
issue. But this time I get an
11 matches
Mail list logo
