On 7 February 2010 20:10, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Feb-04 23:56:27 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>>There is another maths library which can be linked, rather than using
>>-lm. That at least got around this for the previous case of this.
>
> For that matter, if anyone is aware of a suit
On 2010-Feb-04 23:56:27 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>There is another maths library which can be linked, rather than using
>-lm. That at least got around this for the previous case of this.
For that matter, if anyone is aware of a suitably licensed C99 libm,
I'd also be interested.
Since w
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Does this look right?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8185/8185-numerical-noise.patch
Yes. Looks like another thing coming from Solaris having a non-optimal
literal value for e (exp(1), decimal floating point literals, etc.). I'd
much rather fix
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
Does this look right?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8185/8185-numerical-noise.patch
I think you know this already, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly say
so here. The commit must be
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
Does this look right?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8185/8185-numerical-noise.patch
I think you know this already, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly sa
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Does this look right?
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8185/8185-numerical-noise.patch
I think you know this already, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly say
so here. The commit must be on one line. That
On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I created a patch to fix a numerical noise issue.
Expected:
0.85914091422952255
Got:
0.85914091422952277
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8185
After
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I created a patch to fix a numerical noise issue.
Expected:
0.85914091422952255
Got:
0.85914091422952277
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8185
After doing this, I realised I'd put too many dots on the
On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I created a patch to fix a numerical noise issue.
Expected:
0.85914091422952255
Got:
0.85914091422952277
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8185
After doing this, I realised I'd put too many dots on the end, so
instead of the
You can edit the patch with a text editor if it is as trivial as this.
And when you upload it again, you can opt to replace the earlier
patch with the same name.
John
On 4 February 2010 20:03, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I created a patch to fix a numerical noise issue.
>
> Expected:
> 0.85914
I created a patch to fix a numerical noise issue.
Expected:
0.85914091422952255
Got:
0.85914091422952277
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8185
After doing this, I realised I'd put too many dots on the end, so instead of the
two needed, I'd put three.
0.85914091422952...
On
11 matches
Mail list logo
