On 2014-09-29 22:58, Volker Braun wrote:
I propose to remove the SAGE_UPGRADING variable and make it act like it
would be always yes (instead of no, which is the current default).
Right now, we sabotage make to not rebuild dependencies of rebuilt
packages. So you don't have to wait long for your
See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17072
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
I also agree with the removal, with the issue of ATLAS.
Maybe we should switch to openblas (IIRC Clément Pernet said it is more
state of the art nowadays) :)
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:15:59 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17072
--
You received
It is certainly on intel and making strides on arm. It covers a few other
archs through inheritance from gotoblas2 but it doesn't support power7,
never mind power8. I can discuss those more in details for anyone interested.
François
On 30/09/2014, at 21:15, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com
On 2014-09-30 08:24, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I certainly agree with this, but it should be said that make will take
a longer time when changing packages. For example, you will see ATLAS
being rebuilt very frequently (it has many dependencies and if one of
those changes, ATLAS will get rebuilt).
On
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:51:05 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-09-30 08:24, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I certainly agree with this, but it should be said that make will take
a longer time when changing packages. For example, you will see ATLAS
being rebuilt very frequently
I propose to remove the SAGE_UPGRADING variable and make it act like it
would be always yes (instead of no, which is the current default).
Right now, we sabotage make to not rebuild dependencies of rebuilt
packages. So you don't have to wait long for your broken Sage installation.
The only
