On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:43:08 -0800, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:10:29 -0800, Robert Bradshaw
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:55 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>>> I would say that I thin
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:10:29 -0800, Robert Bradshaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:55 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>> I would say that I think Java is the tool for the job, but the
>> question is to roll our own "pure" java
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:10:29 -0800, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:55 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> I would say that I think Java is the tool for the job, but the
> question is to roll our own "pure" java 3d viewer (without all the
> bells and whistles like colore
On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:55 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> Speaking from ignorance, I'm not enthusiastic about a java requirement
> but can be convinced otherwise.
> (1) Can we realy distribute it now (since it is not yet GPL'd)?
Java would be a platform that we would assume they already have. We
woul
On 12/12/06, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (2) is it really fast? I have found that java is annoyingly slow.
>
> Java has really slow startup time, which is really noticeable when it
> halts Firefox. But you can expect applets to run prettty fast, once
> they're running.
>
> Java i
On 12/12/06, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Speaking from ignorance, I'm not enthusiastic about a java requirement
> but can be convinced otherwise.
> (1) Can we realy distribute it now (since it is not yet GPL'd)?
We can't distribute java. However, we can distribute java applets,
be
Speaking from ignorance, I'm not enthusiastic about a java requirement
but can be convinced otherwise.
(1) Can we realy distribute it now (since it is not yet GPL'd)?
(2) is it really fast? I have found that java is annoyingly slow.
In fact, I usually block java (for security reasons, among others
On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:15 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:50:15 -0800, Robert Bradshaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've been looking into the java3d api stuff. ( https://
>> java3d.dev.java.net/ )It has about every feature you can imagine
>> and is
>> very fast (especiall
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, William Stein wrote:
> I don't know. I'd like to get feedback from more people. Already
> requiring
> JAVA is an obstacle, but it's a reasonable one. What does sage-devel
> think?
Fork? Sage, Sage+Java.
>From a previous email of yours, which follows below: "Obviously, ja
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:50:15 -0800, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been looking into the java3d api stuff. ( https://
> java3d.dev.java.net/ )It has about every feature you can imagine and is
> very fast (especially if you have OpenGL on your machine). There is only
> on
10 matches
Mail list logo
