Just recently we changed the way we link to blas, it is now all
through local/lib/pkgconfig/blas.pc. So it will be massively easier to
change the underlying blas implementation, and we are preparing to work
with openblas. And MKL shouldn't be too hard either.
We do have a MKL license to use it
On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 6:51:53 PM UTC+1, David Roe wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ahmed Fasih > wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone, it may be time to revisit Sage & Intel's high-performance
>> libraries—Intel's Community License Program launched a few months ago
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> Hi everyone, it may be time to revisit Sage & Intel's high-performance
> libraries—Intel's Community License Program launched a few months ago and
> gives no-cost, royalty-free licenses for MKL, TBB, IPP, & DAAL:
>
Hi everyone, it may be time to revisit Sage & Intel's high-performance
libraries—Intel's Community License Program launched a few months ago and
gives no-cost, royalty-free licenses for MKL, TBB, IPP, & DAAL:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/free_tools_and_libraries
You register, they send you
On 2013-03-19, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
--=_Part_1140_29982224.1363660802496
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Yes, thats it.
On Monday, March 18, 2013 10:26:55 PM UTC-4, jason wrote:
A while ago they posted on the numpy list telling people that Intel was
On 3/18/13 5:18 PM, François Bissey wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:35:47 Volker Braun wrote:
Well it is registered under my name so I'm not going to post the keys to
the mailing list ;-) But as far as I understand it, the MKL binaries can
be distributed. I haven't had time yet to really look
Yes, thats it.
On Monday, March 18, 2013 10:26:55 PM UTC-4, jason wrote:
A while ago they posted on the numpy list telling people that Intel was
offering MKL licenses to them because they were an open-source
scientific Python project: