On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:55 AM, syd.lavas...@gmail.com wrote:
> [X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future
>
> Mainly because I think everybody should use emacs as their operating system.
> it will save their time and the money they spend on buying fancey computers.
> Also Nicolas is v
[X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future
Mainly because I think everybody should use emacs as their operating
system. it will save their time and the money they spend on buying fancey
computers. Also Nicolas is very cool so I wanted to support his point ;)
That's said, I found c
[X ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
Argument: Sage includes many interfaces to standard software.
This includes software that the majority users will never use in
their lifetimes, e.g. the big M's (unless at a mathematics
department or institute where there exists a license)
Ivan Andrus writes:
> On May 25, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
>> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>>
>> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look
>> at trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666
>> which wants to make
On May 25, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>
> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look at
> trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666 which
> wants to make sage-mode a standard package.
On May 26, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>>>
No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate fo
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for
>>> example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bu
On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
>>
>> No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for
>> example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bugs in Sage, or maybe I'll be
>> flipping burgers. :-)
>>
>
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for
> example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bugs in Sage, or maybe I'll be
> flipping burgers. :-)
>
> It's important to remember that if it's standard someone _has
Dima Pasechnik writes:
> Someone mentioned that GAP has such a mode in a standard distribution,
> but in fact it's horribly broken and obsolete,
This is obviously a problem with GAP, and not with the idea of
distributing an Emacs mode in a standard distribution. I'm sure many
things in GAP are "
On May 26, 2012, at 2:46 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Saturday, May 26, 2012 8:31:11 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:50:12 PM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> > Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
> >
> > [ ] Make it standard a
On May 26, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>>
>> [ ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
>> [ ] Don't make it standard and close the ticket.
>> [ ] Don't make it standard now, but don't close
On May 26, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Ivan Andrus writes:
>> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>>
>> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look
>> at trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666
>> which wants to make sag
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 8:31:11 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:50:12 PM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> > Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>> >
>> > [ ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
>
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:50:12 PM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> > Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
> >
> > [ ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
> > [ ] Don't make it standard and close the ticket.
> > [ ] Don't make it sta
On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>
> [ ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
> [ ] Don't make it standard and close the ticket.
> [ ] Don't make it standard now, but don't close the ticket.
[X] Don't make it standard and close the ticket
Le vendredi 25 mai, Keshav Kini a écrit:
> This. It is very standard for programs to include relevant emacs modes
> and vim syntax/indent/whatever files in their source distribution.
> Cython does this, for example, as does GAP.
This is a very important point which bears repeating : sage should tr
On May 25, 2012, at 16:27 , Volker Braun wrote:
> [X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
>
> Its tiny, too...
"Tiny" is not a good reason to increase the number of moving parts.
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
--
[X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future.
Its tiny, too...
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.c
Ivan Andrus writes:
> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users,
>
> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look at
> trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666 which
> wants to make sage-mode a standard package.
>
> If people want this then
20 matches
Mail list logo
