Dear Dima,
sorry for taking such a long time to answer your question.
I'd say it could do a lot of stuff involving over and sublattices. But then
it seems like Alex is counting orbits. You'd have to build on top of my
code to achieve that.
For my purposes it sufficed to consider a single
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:20:55 AM UTC+2, Simon Brandhorst wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
Dear Simon,
>
> I have written some code (toy implementation) in sage. It could be useful
> for other people as well.
>
That is nice! I am sure it could be useful to other.
> So now I am wondering
O.K. It seems there is some functionality for positive definite lattices in
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15976 and it hides in the sage source :).
However I could not find anything for Indefinite "lattices".
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:20:55 AM UTC+2, Simon Brandhorst wrote:
>
>
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:20:55 AM UTC, Simon Brandhorst wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have written some code (toy implementation) in sage. It could be useful
> for other people as well.
> So now I am wondering whether I should make an effort to implement it
> meeting the sage-devel
