Dima Pasechnik writes:
> On 2012-05-25, mmarco wrote:
>>
>> That's what i meant. What i wanted to ask is if the ubuntu chroot
>> method will also be officially supported.
>
> For this one needs hardware that can test of such a setup
> in a reliable automated way.
> I have no idea how Android dev
On 2012-05-25, mmarco wrote:
>
> That's what i meant. What i wanted to ask is if the ubuntu chroot
> method will also be officially supported.
For this one needs hardware that can test of such a setup
in a reliable automated way.
I have no idea how Android developers do testing ---
I presume the
That's what i meant. What i wanted to ask is if the ubuntu chroot
method will also be officially supported.
On 25 mayo, 17:21, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, mmarco wrote:
>
> >> Let's make ARM an officially supported platform for
> >> Sage!
>
> > Does that include andr
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, mmarco wrote:
>
>
>> Let's make ARM an officially supported platform for
>> Sage!
>>
>
>
> Does that include android?
For now, I think it means Ubuntu on ARM, which includes Android in the
sense of using a chroot install of Ubuntu. I don't know if building
Sage
> Let's make ARM an officially supported platform for
> Sage!
>
Does that include android?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at ht
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik
> Sure, I (perhaps with Keshav as a backup --- Keshav, would you mind
> helping?) can do the admin.
> I suppose 10 hours is still acceptable for a build (I expect it actually be
> quicker with a HD,
> as the solid state drive in my AC100 is kind of s
> Question: I have an old atom N270 netbook with Linux. Would it be
> useful for me to turn this on and put on the internet for sage build
> testing?
>
> -- William
I have one of those, and i did compile sage a couple of times there
with no problems. It shouldn't be different than any other x86
On 2012-05-02 18:50, William Stein wrote:
> Question: I have an old atom N270 netbook with Linux. Would it be
> useful for me to turn this on and put on the internet for sage build
> testing?
Just do it, so I can play with it :-)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-05-01 17:38, William Stein wrote:
>> Thanks for researching this! So I could buy a Trim-Slice H250 for
>> about $350, get a name assigned to it (trim.math.washington.edu)? and
>> put it in our server room. But it will take 10 hours
On 2012-05-01 17:38, William Stein wrote:
> Thanks for researching this! So I could buy a Trim-Slice H250 for
> about $350, get a name assigned to it (trim.math.washington.edu)? and
> put it in our server room. But it will take 10 hours to build sage.
10 hours isn't so bad. We already have 3 bui
Le mardi 01 mai, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
> I suppose 10 hours is still acceptable for a build (I expect it
> actually be quicker with a HD,
> as the solid state drive in my AC100 is kind of slow, and might take
> a lot of wallclock time
> during the build).
More memory will also shorten the build
On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 3:38:26 PM UTC, William wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>> On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-2
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>> On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
> Will some day ARM be one of the platforms of
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>> On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
>>> I guess a platform can only be truly off
Compiling sage in my tablet was so slow that i even considered
emulating an arm system through qemu as an alternative (although it
would probably be even slower, a pc is better suited for long and
intensive cpu usage than an android device).
Regarding the OS for a buildbot, i would really apreciat
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
>>> Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
>> I guess a platform can only be truly officially supported if there is a
>> buildbot for it. If
On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
>> Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
> I guess a platform can only be truly officially supported if there is a
> buildbot for it. If we don't test on ARM, sooner or later something
> will break.
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
> Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
I guess a platform can only be truly officially supported if there is a
buildbot for it. If we don't test on ARM, sooner or later something
will break.
--
To post to this group, send an email to s
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage
Le samedi 28 avril, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
> On 2012-04-28, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a new report on the status of sage on ARM (ubuntu) : I just
> > got a successful build of 5.0.beta14 -- no patch, no special spkg,
> > just the bare, unadorned, ugly-as-can-be 5.0.beta14.
> >
>
On 2012-04-28, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a new report on the status of sage on ARM (ubuntu) : I just got
> a successful build of 5.0.beta14 -- no patch, no special spkg, just the
> bare, unadorned, ugly-as-can-be 5.0.beta14.
>
> So 5.0.beta14 will stay in History as the first sage vers
21 matches
Mail list logo
