[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2 and glpk spkgs

2009-07-31 Thread David Joyner
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > Can you put the source of the failure up at > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6663? This failure I had was fake! Here's what I did. I first tried the evil experimental 4ti2*.spkg. That deleted N Cohen's "good" glpk install f

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2 and glpk spkgs

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
Can you put the source of the failure up at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6663? Thanks for trying it out! Marshall On Jul 31, 7:06 pm, David Joyner wrote: > Thanks for trying this Marshall. Unfortunately, your spkg, and the > older experimental spkg, > for 4ti2, both fail to insta

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2 and glpk spkgs

2009-07-31 Thread David Joyner
Thanks for trying this Marshall. Unfortunately, your spkg, and the older experimental spkg, for 4ti2, both fail to install on my amd64 ubuntu 9.04 machine. I have N Cohen's version of the glpk spkg installed. On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > OK, that was stupid of me

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Marshall, On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > I got from Minh's comment: > > "Once #6502 gets positive review, this SPKG could then be merged in > the Sage standard packages repository." That was a typo on my part. It should be "optional" instead of "standard". My apol

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
I got from Minh's comment: "Once #6502 gets positive review, this SPKG could then be merged in the Sage standard packages repository." -Marshall On Jul 31, 6:20 pm, David Joyner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > > Thanks for pointing that out. I am somewhat

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread David Joyner
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > Thanks for pointing that out.  I am somewhat disturbed by the positive > review for that becoming a standard package, which seems inconsistent I don't know where you got that. I was the reviewer and I clearly said "Positive review fro

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
Thanks for pointing that out. I am somewhat disturbed by the positive review for that becoming a standard package, which seems inconsistent with previous policy. In #6663 I am merely suggesting 4ti2 and glpk as experimental packages, with the idea of transitioning them to optional, and then mayb

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Marshall Hampton wrote: > I'm not disagreeing, I just don't know how to quickly change that. If > someone can give me some tips I will at least patch the spkgs. > > -Marshall There may be no quick fix, though the code did not look very large, so I doubt it would be a huge job to do it properly

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Willem Jan Palenstijn
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:18:58PM -0700, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check > out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and > try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so. > > On the positive side, I think

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
I'm not disagreeing, I just don't know how to quickly change that. If someone can give me some tips I will at least patch the spkgs. -Marshall On Jul 31, 4:21 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: > > > > > > > Marshall Hampton wrote: > > > I agr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > Marshall Hampton wrote: > > I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check > > out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and > > try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so. > > > > On th

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Marshall Hampton wrote: > I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check > out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and > try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so. > > On the positive side, I think I now have packages that install > correctly,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2, glpk packages

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so. On the positive side, I think I now have packages that install correctly, at least on my own mac. They are a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Marshall Hampton wrote: >> I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting >> it to recognize GMP. I'm sure many people on this list are more >> qualified than I am to figure that out. >> >> t4i2 requires the linear programming package glpk, which I

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Marshall Hampton wrote: > I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting > it to recognize GMP. I'm sure many people on this list are more > qualified than I am to figure that out. > > t4i2 requires the linear programming package glpk, which I think I did > succeed in maki

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2 and glpk spkgs

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
OK, that was stupid of me, I should have looked in the experimental packages first. There are older ones for 4ti2 and glpk, which might solve my problems. -Marshall On Jul 31, 11:15 am, Marshall Hampton wrote: > I'm just editing the subject line to attract attention from people > like Mike Han

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package, 4ti2 and glpk spkgs

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
I'm just editing the subject line to attract attention from people like Mike Hansen who might have done overlapping work. -Marshall On Jul 31, 11:03 am, Marshall Hampton wrote: > I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting > it to recognize GMP. I'm sure many people o

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-31 Thread Marshall Hampton
I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting it to recognize GMP. I'm sure many people on this list are more qualified than I am to figure that out. t4i2 requires the linear programming package glpk, which I think I did succeed in making an spkg for - at least it works o

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-27 Thread David Joyner
I'm having trouble with 4ti installation. Maybe I'm just too impatient. Do you have an spkg for it? On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:02 PM, davidp wrote: > > Marshall and David: thanks very much for these suggestions. > > Dave > > On Jul 20, 4:59 am, David Joyner wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:3

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-20 Thread davidp
Marshall and David: thanks very much for these suggestions. Dave On Jul 20, 4:59 am, David Joyner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, davidp wrote: > > > I have been working on a Sage package for doing computations involving > > the > > Abelian Sandpile Model.  In addition, this summer I

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-20 Thread David Joyner
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, davidp wrote: > > I have been working on a Sage package for doing computations involving > the > Abelian Sandpile Model.  In addition, this summer I am the mentor for > a Google > Summer of Code project which is a java application for visualizing and > analyzing sa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage sandpiles package

2009-07-19 Thread Marshall Hampton
One minor typo: under "Self-organized criticality", "ascpect" should be "aspect". The documentation is excellent, that's quite impressive. As I am unfamiliar with the subject, I haven't absorbed enough of it to make really helpful comments but I will try to look more closely. One thing that com