[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-12 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM, David Joyner wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Juan Jose > Garcia-Ripoll wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Juan Jose >> Garcia-Ripoll wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Dr. David >>> Kirkby wrote: > maxima seemed to install fin

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-12 Thread David Joyner
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Juan Jose > Garcia-Ripoll wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Dr. David >> Kirkby wrote: maxima seemed to install fine on an intel macbook running 10.4.11.[...] However, the ecl

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-12 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Dr. David > Kirkby wrote: >>> maxima seemed to install fine on an intel macbook running 10.4.11.[...] >>> However, the ecl install failed. There were a lot of errors, but here are >>> some near the

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-12 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jason Grout wrote: > Robert Dodier wrote: >> Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> >>> sage: A.eigenvectors() >>> Expected: >>> [[[2,11],[1,2]],[0,0,1],[0,1,1/3]] >>> Got: >>> [[[2,11],[1,2]],[[[0,0,1]],[[0,1,1/3 >> eigenvectors now tries to present more detail in its return value. >> ? eigen

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Jason Grout
Robert Dodier wrote: > Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > >> sage: A.eigenvectors() >> Expected: >> [[[2,11],[1,2]],[0,0,1],[0,1,1/3]] >> Got: >> [[[2,11],[1,2]],[[[0,0,1]],[[0,1,1/3 > > eigenvectors now tries to present more detail in its return value. > ? eigenvectors describes the retu

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> maxima seemed to install fine on an intel macbook running 10.4.11.[...] >> However, the ecl install failed. There were a lot of errors, but here are >> some near the tail: > > Perhaps Juanjo has some idea, as he is the maintainer. I beli

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
David Joyner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Dr. David > Kirkby wrote: > > ... > >> It would be good if some people could try >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1/ecl-9.8.1.spkg >> and >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/max

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: ... > > It would be good if some people could try > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1/ecl-9.8.1.spkg > and > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/maxima-5.19.0/maxima-5.19.0.spkg > >

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Simon King wrote: > Hi! > > On Aug 11, 10:04 am, Tim Lahey wrote: >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >>> 1) Some things 'fail' a test as they are now evaluated in Maxima. e.g. >>> sage: integral( exp(-x^2)*ln(x), x, 0, oo) >>> Expected: >>> integrate(e^(-x^2)*log(x),

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Simon King
Hi! On Aug 11, 10:04 am, Tim Lahey wrote: > On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > 1) Some things 'fail' a test as they are now evaluated in Maxima. e.g. > > >     sage: integral( exp(-x^2)*ln(x), x, 0, oo) > > Expected: > >     integrate(e^(-x^2)*log(x), x, 0, +Infinity) > > G

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Robert Dodier
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > sage: A.eigenvectors() > Expected: > [[[2,11],[1,2]],[0,0,1],[0,1,1/3]] > Got: > [[[2,11],[1,2]],[[[0,0,1]],[[0,1,1/3 eigenvectors now tries to present more detail in its return value. ? eigenvectors describes the return value. See the Maxima mailing lis

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Tim Lahey
On Aug 11, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > Tim Lahey wrote: >> >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> >>> 1) Some things 'fail' a test as they are now evaluated in Maxima. >>> e.g. >>> >>>sage: integral( exp(-x^2)*ln(x), x, 0, oo) >>> Expected: >>>inte

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Tim Lahey wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > >> 1) Some things 'fail' a test as they are now evaluated in Maxima. e.g. >> >> sage: integral( exp(-x^2)*ln(x), x, 0, oo) >> Expected: >> integrate(e^(-x^2)*log(x), x, 0, +Infinity) >> Got: >> -1/4*(euler_ga

[sage-devel] Re: Test failures with sage-4.1.1.rc0 with Maxima 5.19.0

2009-08-11 Thread Tim Lahey
On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > 1) Some things 'fail' a test as they are now evaluated in Maxima. e.g. > > sage: integral( exp(-x^2)*ln(x), x, 0, oo) > Expected: > integrate(e^(-x^2)*log(x), x, 0, +Infinity) > Got: > -1/4*(euler_gamma + 2*log(2))*sqrt(pi) > >