On 27 September 2012 07:34, JBT wrote:
> I think my failure on installing sage the other day had something to do with
> installing python 2.7.3 rather than compiling scipy. It seems to me that
> somehow the installer failed to compile basic modules, such as time, math,
> etc., for python. But I am
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:45:10 PM UTC-7, Benjamin Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Benjamin Jones
>
> > I have a macbook-pro running 10.8.2 now, I'll give building 5.3 with
> > the special instructions a shot tomorrow and report back.
> >
> > --
> > Benjamin Jones
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Benjamin Jones
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:14 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:45:48 PM UTC-7, JBT wrote:
>>>
>>> Just out of curiosity, when will be OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion) supported by
>>> SAGE, officially?
>>
>>
I think my failure on installing sage the other day had something to do
with installing python 2.7.3 rather than compiling scipy. It seems to me
that somehow the installer failed to compile basic modules, such as time,
math, etc., for python. But I am new to both python and sage. So, I could
ve
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:14 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:45:48 PM UTC-7, JBT wrote:
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, when will be OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion) supported by
>> SAGE, officially?
>
>
> Well, we need to get enough people running OS X 10.8 to build and
On 9/26/12 9:14 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:45:48 PM UTC-7, JBT wrote:
Just out of curiosity, when will be OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion)
supported by SAGE, officially?
Well, we need to get enough people running OS X 10.8 to build and test
Sage successful
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:45:48 PM UTC-7, JBT wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, when will be OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion) supported by
> SAGE, officially?
Well, we need to get enough people running OS X 10.8 to build and test Sage
successfully. Three of us (as far as I can tell) have do